public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/3] Optimize load uCode performance
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 10:55:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AC3BF2A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4e4c299-869c-1917-e21b-140af43b54a9@redhat.com>

Hi Laszlo,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 5:58 PM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch 0/3] Optimize load uCode performance
> 
> On 07/11/18 13:07, Eric Dong wrote:
> > Use below three rules to optimize load uCode performance:
> > 1. Let BSP relocate uCode from flash to memory for better performance.
> > 2. BSP caches the CPU ID and address of uCode so AP doesn’t need to look
> >    for the uCode again if the CPU ID is same as BSP’s.
> > 3. Only apply uCode in one thread of a core when hyper threading is
> enabled.
> >
> > Test:
> > Use an sample platform which has 1 socket, 4 core, 8 threads, the
> > CpuMpPei driver cost time reduce from 108.4ms to 27.2ms
> >
> > Eric Dong (3):
> >   UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate uCode to memory to save time.
> >   UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Use BSP uCode for APs if possible.
> >   UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Load uCode once for one core.
> >
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c | 43
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c     | 17 ++++++++++---
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h     | 11 ++++++--
> >  3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > edk2-devel mailing list
> > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> >
> 
> I also tried to regression test this with OVMF. (I know I requested some
> changes for patch #1, however those would only affect behavior in practice
> when memory allocation fails, so it makes sense for me to test this version of
> the series as well.)
> 
> Unfortunately, the patch set doesn't apply; it fails with the first patch already.
> I tried on top of current master, commit 0a563f3fecfd
> ("BaseTool: Fixed the incorrect cache key.", 2018-07-12).
> 
> Can you please post a v2 that is also rebased on current master?
> 

I just send v2 patches base on the latest codebase, please verify with the newer one.

> Thanks
> Laszlo

      reply	other threads:[~2018-07-12 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-11 11:07 [Patch 0/3] Optimize load uCode performance Eric Dong
2018-07-11 11:07 ` [Patch 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate uCode to memory to save time Eric Dong
2018-07-12  9:26   ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-12 10:54     ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-11 11:07 ` [Patch 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Use BSP uCode for APs if possible Eric Dong
2018-07-12  9:42   ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-12 10:30     ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-11 11:07 ` [Patch 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Load uCode once for one core Eric Dong
2018-07-12  9:49   ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-11 16:08 ` [Patch 0/3] Optimize load uCode performance Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-12  9:58 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-12 10:55   ` Dong, Eric [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AC3BF2A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox