From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: fix incorrect check of SMM mode
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:17:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AC3C9D0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180713055357.4196-1-jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 1:54 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>;
> Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: fix incorrect check of SMM mode
>
> Current IsInSmm() method makes use of gEfiSmmBase2ProtocolGuid.InSmm()
> to check if current processor is in SMM mode or not. But this is not correct
> because gEfiSmmBase2ProtocolGuid.InSmm() can only detect if the caller is
> running in SMRAM or from SMM driver. It cannot guarantee if the caller is
> running in SMM mode. Because SMM mode will load its own page table,
> adding an extra check of saved DXE page table base address against current
> CR3 register value can help to get the correct answer for sure (in SMM mode
> or not in SMM mode).
>
> This is an issue caused by check-in at
>
> d106cf71eabaacff63c14626a4a87346b93074dd
>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c
> index 850eed60e7..df021798c0 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,14 @@ IsInSmm (
> mSmmBase2->InSmm (mSmmBase2, &InSmm);
> }
>
> - return InSmm;
> + //
> + // mSmmBase2->InSmm() can only detect if the caller is running in
> + SMRAM // or from SMM driver. It cannot tell if the caller is running in
> SMM mode.
> + // Check page table base address to guarantee that because SMM mode
> + willl // load its own page table.
> + //
> + return (InSmm &&
> + mPagingContext.ContextData.X64.PageTableBase !=
> + (UINT64)AsmReadCr3());
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.16.2.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-16 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 5:53 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: fix incorrect check of SMM mode Jian J Wang
2018-07-16 8:17 ` Dong, Eric [this message]
2018-07-17 14:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-18 2:35 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-07-19 14:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-20 2:16 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-07-19 9:07 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-07-19 13:01 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AC3C9D0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox