public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task.
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 02:35:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66225576C2D5@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BE97331@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Hi Ruiyu,

Below link with my changes:

https://github.com/ydong10/edk2/tree/MSR

Thanks,
Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ruiyu
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 10:13 AM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Subject: RE: [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task.
> 
> Eric,
> Can you post your changes to github yours mirror repo?
> I found #3/6 cannot be applied to my code properly.
> 
> Thanks/Ray
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dong, Eric
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:16 AM
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Subject: [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task.
> >
> > V2 changes include:
> > 1. Include the change for CpuCommonFeaturesLib which used to set MSR
> > base on its scope info.
> > 2. Include the change for CpuS3DataDxe driver which also handle the
> > AcpiCpuData data.
> > 3. Update code base on feedback for V1 changes.
> >
> > V1 changes include:
> > In a system which has multiple cores, current set register value task
> > costs huge times.
> > After investigation, current set MSR task costs most of the times.
> > Current logic uses SpinLock to let set MSR task as an single thread task for
> all cores.
> > Because MSR has scope attribute which may cause GP fault if multiple
> > APs set MSR at the same time, current logic use an easiest solution
> > (use SpinLock) to avoid this issue, but it will cost huge times.
> >
> > In order to fix this performance issue, new solution will set MSRs
> > base on their scope attribute. After this, the SpinLock will not
> > needed. Without SpinLock, new issue raised which is caused by MSR
> > dependence. For example, MSR A depends on MSR B which means MSR A
> must
> > been set after MSR B has been set. Also MSR B is package scope level
> > and MSR A is thread scope level. If system has multiple threads,
> > Thread 1 needs to set the thread level MSRs and thread 2 needs to set
> > thread and package level MSRs. Set MSRs task for thread 1 and thread 2
> like below:
> >
> >             Thread 1                 Thread 2
> > MSR B          N                        Y
> > MSR A          Y                        Y
> >
> > If driver don't control execute MSR order, for thread 1, it will
> > execute MSR A first, but at this time, MSR B not been executed yet by
> > thread 2. system may trig exception at this time.
> >
> > In order to fix the above issue, driver introduces semaphore logic to
> > control the MSR execute sequence. For the above case, a semaphore will
> > be add between MSR A and B for all threads. Semaphore has scope info
> > for it. The possible scope value is core or package.
> > For each thread, when it meets a semaphore during it set registers, it
> > will 1) release semaphore (+1) for each threads in this core or
> > package(based on the scope info for this
> > semaphore) 2) acquire semaphore (-1) for all the threads in this core
> > or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore). With these two
> > steps, driver can control MSR sequence. Sample code logic like below:
> >
> >   //
> >   // First increase semaphore count by 1 for processors in this package.
> >   //
> >   for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < PackageThreadsCount ;
> > ProcessorIndex ++) {
> >     LibReleaseSemaphore ((UINT32 *) &SemaphorePtr[PackageOffset +
> > ProcessorIndex]);
> >   }
> >   //
> >   // Second, check whether the count has reach the check number.
> >   //
> >   for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < ValidApCount;
> > ProcessorIndex ++) {
> >     LibWaitForSemaphore (&SemaphorePtr[ApOffset]);
> >   }
> >
> > Platform Requirement:
> > 1. This change requires register MSR setting base on MSR scope info.
> > If still register MSR
> >    for all threads, exception may raised.
> >
> > Known limitation:
> > 1. Current CpuFeatures driver supports DXE instance and PEI instance.
> > But semaphore logic
> >    requires Aps execute in async mode which is not supported by PEI driver.
> > So CpuFeature
> >    PEI instance not works after this change. We plan to support async
> > mode for PEI in phase
> >    2 for this task.
> > 2. Current execute MSR task code in duplicated in PiSmmCpuDxeSmm
> > driver and
> >    RegisterCpuFeaturesLib library because the schedule limitation.
> > Will merge the code to
> >    RegisterCpuFeaturesLib and export as an API in phase 2 for this task.
> >
> > Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> >
> >
> > Eric Dong (6):
> >   UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h: Add Semaphore related Information.
> >   UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h: Add new dependence types.
> >   UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add logic to support semaphore
> >     type.
> >   UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add logic to support semaphore type.
> >   UefiCpuPkg/CpuS3DataDxe: Keep old data if value already existed.
> >   UefiCpuPkg/CpuCommonFeaturesLib: Register MSR base on scope Info.
> >
> >  UefiCpuPkg/CpuS3DataDxe/CpuS3Data.c                |   2 +
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h                   |  45 +-
> >  .../Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h       |  25 +-
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/C1e.c      |   8 +
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Eist.c     |  12 +
> >  .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/ExecuteDisable.c  |  10 +
> >  .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/FastStrings.c     |  12 +
> >  .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/FeatureControl.c  |  38 ++
> >  .../CpuCommonFeaturesLib/LimitCpuIdMaxval.c        |  14 +
> >  .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/MachineCheck.c    |  38 ++
> >  .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/MonitorMwait.c    |  15 +
> >  .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/PendingBreak.c    |  11 +
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Ppin.c     |  11 +
> >  .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/ProcTrace.c       |  11 +
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/X2Apic.c   |  10 +
> >  .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 438
> > ++++++++++++++++---
> >  .../DxeRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c                    |  71 ++-
> >  .../DxeRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.inf                  |   3 +
> >  .../PeiRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c                    |  55 ++-
> >  .../PeiRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.inf                  |   1 +
> >  .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h   |  61 ++-
> >  .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c                       | 484 ++++++++++++++++++---
> >  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c                  | 406 +++++++++++-----
> -
> >  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c              |   3 -
> >  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h         |   3 +-
> >  25 files changed, 1505 insertions(+), 282 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.15.0.windows.1



      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-18  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-17  2:16 [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task Eric Dong
2018-10-17  2:16 ` [Patch v2 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h: Add Semaphore related Information Eric Dong
2018-10-18  3:04   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-18  3:10   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17  2:16 ` [Patch v2 2/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h: Add new dependence types Eric Dong
2018-10-18  3:31   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17  2:16 ` [Patch v2 3/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add logic to support semaphore type Eric Dong
2018-10-18  5:46   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17  2:16 ` [Patch v2 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: " Eric Dong
2018-10-18  5:54   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17  2:16 ` [Patch v2 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/CpuS3DataDxe: Keep old data if value already existed Eric Dong
2018-10-18  5:57   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17  2:16 ` [Patch v2 6/6] UefiCpuPkg/CpuCommonFeaturesLib: Register MSR base on scope Info Eric Dong
2018-10-18  6:01   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17 17:33 ` [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task Laszlo Ersek
2018-10-18  7:36   ` Dong, Eric
2018-10-18  2:12 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-18  2:35   ` Dong, Eric [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66225576C2D5@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox