From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task.
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 02:35:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66225576C2D5@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BE97331@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Ruiyu,
Below link with my changes:
https://github.com/ydong10/edk2/tree/MSR
Thanks,
Eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ruiyu
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 10:13 AM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Subject: RE: [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task.
>
> Eric,
> Can you post your changes to github yours mirror repo?
> I found #3/6 cannot be applied to my code properly.
>
> Thanks/Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dong, Eric
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:16 AM
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Subject: [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task.
> >
> > V2 changes include:
> > 1. Include the change for CpuCommonFeaturesLib which used to set MSR
> > base on its scope info.
> > 2. Include the change for CpuS3DataDxe driver which also handle the
> > AcpiCpuData data.
> > 3. Update code base on feedback for V1 changes.
> >
> > V1 changes include:
> > In a system which has multiple cores, current set register value task
> > costs huge times.
> > After investigation, current set MSR task costs most of the times.
> > Current logic uses SpinLock to let set MSR task as an single thread task for
> all cores.
> > Because MSR has scope attribute which may cause GP fault if multiple
> > APs set MSR at the same time, current logic use an easiest solution
> > (use SpinLock) to avoid this issue, but it will cost huge times.
> >
> > In order to fix this performance issue, new solution will set MSRs
> > base on their scope attribute. After this, the SpinLock will not
> > needed. Without SpinLock, new issue raised which is caused by MSR
> > dependence. For example, MSR A depends on MSR B which means MSR A
> must
> > been set after MSR B has been set. Also MSR B is package scope level
> > and MSR A is thread scope level. If system has multiple threads,
> > Thread 1 needs to set the thread level MSRs and thread 2 needs to set
> > thread and package level MSRs. Set MSRs task for thread 1 and thread 2
> like below:
> >
> > Thread 1 Thread 2
> > MSR B N Y
> > MSR A Y Y
> >
> > If driver don't control execute MSR order, for thread 1, it will
> > execute MSR A first, but at this time, MSR B not been executed yet by
> > thread 2. system may trig exception at this time.
> >
> > In order to fix the above issue, driver introduces semaphore logic to
> > control the MSR execute sequence. For the above case, a semaphore will
> > be add between MSR A and B for all threads. Semaphore has scope info
> > for it. The possible scope value is core or package.
> > For each thread, when it meets a semaphore during it set registers, it
> > will 1) release semaphore (+1) for each threads in this core or
> > package(based on the scope info for this
> > semaphore) 2) acquire semaphore (-1) for all the threads in this core
> > or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore). With these two
> > steps, driver can control MSR sequence. Sample code logic like below:
> >
> > //
> > // First increase semaphore count by 1 for processors in this package.
> > //
> > for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < PackageThreadsCount ;
> > ProcessorIndex ++) {
> > LibReleaseSemaphore ((UINT32 *) &SemaphorePtr[PackageOffset +
> > ProcessorIndex]);
> > }
> > //
> > // Second, check whether the count has reach the check number.
> > //
> > for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < ValidApCount;
> > ProcessorIndex ++) {
> > LibWaitForSemaphore (&SemaphorePtr[ApOffset]);
> > }
> >
> > Platform Requirement:
> > 1. This change requires register MSR setting base on MSR scope info.
> > If still register MSR
> > for all threads, exception may raised.
> >
> > Known limitation:
> > 1. Current CpuFeatures driver supports DXE instance and PEI instance.
> > But semaphore logic
> > requires Aps execute in async mode which is not supported by PEI driver.
> > So CpuFeature
> > PEI instance not works after this change. We plan to support async
> > mode for PEI in phase
> > 2 for this task.
> > 2. Current execute MSR task code in duplicated in PiSmmCpuDxeSmm
> > driver and
> > RegisterCpuFeaturesLib library because the schedule limitation.
> > Will merge the code to
> > RegisterCpuFeaturesLib and export as an API in phase 2 for this task.
> >
> > Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> >
> >
> > Eric Dong (6):
> > UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h: Add Semaphore related Information.
> > UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h: Add new dependence types.
> > UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add logic to support semaphore
> > type.
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add logic to support semaphore type.
> > UefiCpuPkg/CpuS3DataDxe: Keep old data if value already existed.
> > UefiCpuPkg/CpuCommonFeaturesLib: Register MSR base on scope Info.
> >
> > UefiCpuPkg/CpuS3DataDxe/CpuS3Data.c | 2 +
> > UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h | 45 +-
> > .../Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h | 25 +-
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/C1e.c | 8 +
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Eist.c | 12 +
> > .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/ExecuteDisable.c | 10 +
> > .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/FastStrings.c | 12 +
> > .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/FeatureControl.c | 38 ++
> > .../CpuCommonFeaturesLib/LimitCpuIdMaxval.c | 14 +
> > .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/MachineCheck.c | 38 ++
> > .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/MonitorMwait.c | 15 +
> > .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/PendingBreak.c | 11 +
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Ppin.c | 11 +
> > .../Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/ProcTrace.c | 11 +
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/X2Apic.c | 10 +
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 438
> > ++++++++++++++++---
> > .../DxeRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 71 ++-
> > .../DxeRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.inf | 3 +
> > .../PeiRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 55 ++-
> > .../PeiRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.inf | 1 +
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 61 ++-
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 484 ++++++++++++++++++---
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c | 406 +++++++++++-----
> -
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c | 3 -
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h | 3 +-
> > 25 files changed, 1505 insertions(+), 282 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.15.0.windows.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-17 2:16 [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task Eric Dong
2018-10-17 2:16 ` [Patch v2 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h: Add Semaphore related Information Eric Dong
2018-10-18 3:04 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-18 3:10 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17 2:16 ` [Patch v2 2/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h: Add new dependence types Eric Dong
2018-10-18 3:31 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17 2:16 ` [Patch v2 3/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add logic to support semaphore type Eric Dong
2018-10-18 5:46 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17 2:16 ` [Patch v2 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: " Eric Dong
2018-10-18 5:54 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17 2:16 ` [Patch v2 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/CpuS3DataDxe: Keep old data if value already existed Eric Dong
2018-10-18 5:57 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17 2:16 ` [Patch v2 6/6] UefiCpuPkg/CpuCommonFeaturesLib: Register MSR base on scope Info Eric Dong
2018-10-18 6:01 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-17 17:33 ` [Patch v2 0/6] Fix performance issue caused by Set MSR task Laszlo Ersek
2018-10-18 7:36 ` Dong, Eric
2018-10-18 2:12 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-18 2:35 ` Dong, Eric [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66225576C2D5@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox