From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Simplify PcdCpuFeaturesSupport.
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 01:01:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259DB0177@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7831b95d-de56-2bb1-9d3f-99cbf596dcb8@redhat.com>
Hi Laszlo,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:01 AM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Patch 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Simplify
> PcdCpuFeaturesSupport.
>
> On 02/13/19 03:04, Eric Dong wrote:
> > PcdCpuFeaturesSupport used to specify the platform policy about what
> > CPU features this platform supports. This value is decide by platform
> > owner, not by hardware. After this change, this PCD will be used in
> > IsCpuFeatureSupported function only.
> >
> > Now RegisterCpuFeaturesLib use this PCD as an template to Get the pcd
> > size. Update the code logic to replace it with PcdCpuFeaturesSetting.
> >
> > BZ:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1375
> >
> > Cc: Ray Ni <Ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > ---
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 66 +++++++------------
> ---
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 1 -
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 10 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> > index 4ebd0025b4..762eaec277 100644
> > ---
> > a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.
> > +++ c
> > @@ -74,27 +74,6 @@ GetSettingPcd (
> > return SettingBitMask;
> > }
> >
> > -/**
> > - Worker function to get PcdCpuFeaturesSupport.
> > -
> > - @return The pointer to CPU feature bits mask buffer.
> > -**/
> > -UINT8 *
> > -GetSupportPcd (
> > - VOID
> > - )
> > -{
> > - UINT8 *SupportBitMask;
> > -
> > - SupportBitMask = AllocateCopyPool (
> > - PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport),
> > - PcdGetPtr (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport)
> > - );
> > - ASSERT (SupportBitMask != NULL);
> > -
> > - return SupportBitMask;
> > -}
> > -
> > /**
> > Collects CPU type and feature information.
> >
> > @@ -282,11 +261,6 @@ CpuInitDataInitialize (
> > ASSERT (CpuFeaturesData->CpuFlags.CoreSemaphoreCount != NULL);
> > CpuFeaturesData->CpuFlags.PackageSemaphoreCount =
> AllocateZeroPool (sizeof (UINT32) * CpuStatus->PackageCount * CpuStatus-
> >MaxCoreCount * CpuStatus->MaxThreadCount);
> > ASSERT (CpuFeaturesData->CpuFlags.PackageSemaphoreCount != NULL);
> > -
> > - //
> > - // Get support and configuration PCDs
> > - //
> > - CpuFeaturesData->SupportPcd = GetSupportPcd ();
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -306,7 +280,7 @@ SupportedMaskOr (
> > UINT8 *Data1;
> > UINT8 *Data2;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> > Data1 = SupportedFeatureMask;
> > Data2 = OrFeatureBitMask;
> > for (Index = 0; Index < BitMaskSize; Index++) { @@ -331,7 +305,7 @@
> > SupportedMaskAnd (
> > UINT8 *Data1;
> > UINT8 *Data2;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> > Data1 = SupportedFeatureMask;
> > Data2 = AndFeatureBitMask;
> > for (Index = 0; Index < BitMaskSize; Index++) { @@ -356,7 +330,7 @@
> > SupportedMaskCleanBit (
> > UINT8 *Data1;
> > UINT8 *Data2;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> > Data1 = SupportedFeatureMask;
> > Data2 = AndFeatureBitMask;
> > for (Index = 0; Index < BitMaskSize; Index++) { @@ -387,7 +361,7 @@
> > IsBitMaskMatch (
> > UINT8 *Data1;
> > UINT8 *Data2;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> >
> > Data1 = SupportedFeatureMask;
> > Data2 = ComparedFeatureBitMask;
> > @@ -426,22 +400,22 @@ CollectProcessorData (
> > Entry = GetFirstNode (&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList);
> > while (!IsNull (&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList, Entry)) {
> > CpuFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (Entry);
> > - if (IsBitMaskMatch (CpuFeaturesData->SupportPcd, CpuFeature-
> >FeatureMask)) {
> > - if (CpuFeature->SupportFunc == NULL) {
> > - //
> > - // If SupportFunc is NULL, then the feature is supported.
> > - //
> > - SupportedMaskOr (
> > - CpuFeaturesData-
> >InitOrder[ProcessorNumber].FeaturesSupportedMask,
> > - CpuFeature->FeatureMask
> > - );
> > - } else if (CpuFeature->SupportFunc (ProcessorNumber, CpuInfo,
> CpuFeature->ConfigData)) {
> > - SupportedMaskOr (
> > - CpuFeaturesData-
> >InitOrder[ProcessorNumber].FeaturesSupportedMask,
> > - CpuFeature->FeatureMask
> > - );
> > - }
> > +
> > + if (CpuFeature->SupportFunc == NULL) {
> > + //
> > + // If SupportFunc is NULL, then the feature is supported.
> > + //
> > + SupportedMaskOr (
> > + CpuFeaturesData-
> >InitOrder[ProcessorNumber].FeaturesSupportedMask,
> > + CpuFeature->FeatureMask
> > + );
> > + } else if (CpuFeature->SupportFunc (ProcessorNumber, CpuInfo,
> CpuFeature->ConfigData)) {
> > + SupportedMaskOr (
> > + CpuFeaturesData-
> >InitOrder[ProcessorNumber].FeaturesSupportedMask,
> > + CpuFeature->FeatureMask
> > + );
> > }
> > +
> > Entry = Entry->ForwardLink;
> > }
> > }
>
> The functional effect of the change in CollectProcessorData() is too complex
> for me to determine, so I'd like to leave the review of this patch to Ray only.
>
> (1) FWIW, I've attempted to read the BZ carefully, and it seems the patch
> doesn't do all things that the BZ suggests:
>
> - The IsCpuFeatureSupported() function is not removed. That could be
> correct, but then I think it should be explained in the BZ (i.e. update the
> scope).
Agree, added notes in the BZ to explain what real changes will do.
>
> - Is it asserted somewhere that PcdCpuFeaturesSetting and
> PcdCpuFeaturesCapability have equal size?
Sorry, I missed this part. Will include it in V2 changes.
>
> (2) Independently, please append (or prepend) a cleanup patch to the series.
> Namely, the comment block on IsCpuFeatureSetInCpuPcd() references
> "PcdCpuFeaturesSupport". It should reference "CpuBitMask"
> instead, IMO.
Agree, will include it in v2 changes.
Thanks,
Eric
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
>
> > @@ -646,8 +620,6 @@ AnalysisProcessorFeatures (
> > DumpCpuFeature (CpuFeature);
> > Entry = Entry->ForwardLink;
> > }
> > - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "PcdCpuFeaturesSupport:\n"));
> > - DumpCpuFeatureMask (CpuFeaturesData->SupportPcd);
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "PcdCpuFeaturesCapability:\n"));
> > DumpCpuFeatureMask (CpuFeaturesData->CapabilityPcd);
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "PcdCpuFeaturesSetting:\n")); diff --git
> > a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
> > index 3e0a342fd1..836ed3549c 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
> > @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ typedef struct {
> > LIST_ENTRY FeatureList;
> >
> > CPU_FEATURES_INIT_ORDER *InitOrder;
> > - UINT8 *SupportPcd;
> > UINT8 *CapabilityPcd;
> > UINT8 *SettingPcd;
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> > index 3540029079..3e8e899766 100644
> > ---
> > a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> > +++
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib
> > +++ .c
> > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ IsCpuFeatureMatch (
> > {
> > UINTN BitMaskSize;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> > if (CompareMem (FirstFeatureMask, SecondFeatureMask, BitMaskSize)
> == 0) {
> > return TRUE;
> > } else {
> > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ DumpCpuFeatureMask (
> > UINT8 *Data8;
> > UINTN BitMaskSize;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> > Data8 = (UINT8 *) FeatureMask;
> > for (Index = 0; Index < BitMaskSize; Index++) {
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, " %02x ", *Data8++)); @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
> > IsBitMaskMatchCheck (
> > UINT8 *Data1;
> > UINT8 *Data2;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> >
> > Data1 = FeatureMask;
> > Data2 = DependentBitMask;
> > @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ RegisterCpuFeatureWorker (
> > UINTN BitMaskSize;
> > BOOLEAN FeatureExist;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> > CpuFeaturesData = GetCpuFeaturesData ();
> > if (CpuFeaturesData->FeaturesCount == 0) {
> > InitializeListHead (&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList); @@ -870,7
> > +870,7 @@ RegisterCpuFeature (
> > BeforeAll = FALSE;
> > AfterAll = FALSE;
> >
> > - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport);
> > + BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> >
> > VA_START (Marker, InitializeFunc);
> > Feature = VA_ARG (Marker, UINT32);
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 2:04 [Patch 0/3] Simplify CPU Features solution Eric Dong
2019-02-13 2:04 ` [Patch 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Remove useless functions Eric Dong
2019-02-13 2:23 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-02-13 2:04 ` [Patch 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Optimize PCD PcdCpuFeaturesUserConfiguration Eric Dong
2019-02-13 2:43 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-02-14 2:00 ` Dong, Eric
2019-02-14 8:47 ` Ni, Ray
2019-02-13 2:04 ` [Patch 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Simplify PcdCpuFeaturesSupport Eric Dong
2019-02-13 3:01 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-02-14 1:01 ` Dong, Eric [this message]
2019-02-14 8:59 ` Ni, Ray
2019-02-14 8:57 ` [Patch 0/3] Simplify CPU Features solution Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259DB0177@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox