From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/Cpuid: Dump leaf 1FH information correctly
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 06:39:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259DF8935@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190329084159.69164-1-ray.ni@intel.com>
Hi Ray,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 4:42 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/Cpuid: Dump leaf 1FH information correctly
>
> Leaf 1FH is very similar to leaf 0BH. Both return the CPU topology information.
> Leaf 0BH returns 3-level (Package/Core/Thread) CPU topology info.
> Leaf 1FH returns 6-level (Package/Die/Tile/Module/Core/Thread) CPU
> topology info.
> The logic to enumerate the topology info is the same.
>
> But today's logic to handle 1FH is completely wrong.
> The patch combines them together to fix the 1FH issue.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/Application/Cpuid/Cpuid.c | 83 ++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Application/Cpuid/Cpuid.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Application/Cpuid/Cpuid.c
> index 67cacf2714..3d242a0cbf 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Application/Cpuid/Cpuid.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Application/Cpuid/Cpuid.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /** @file
> UEFI Application to display CPUID leaf information.
>
> - Copyright (c) 2016 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> + Copyright (c) 2016 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights
> + reserved.<BR>
> This program and the accompanying materials
> are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD
> License
> which accompanies this distribution. The full text of the license may be
> found at @@ -717,36 +717,42 @@
> CpuidArchitecturalPerformanceMonitoring ( **/ VOID
> CpuidExtendedTopology (
> - VOID
> + UINT32 LeafFunction
> )
> {
> - CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_EAX Eax;
> - CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_EBX Ebx;
> - CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ECX Ecx;
> - UINT32 Edx;
> - UINT32 LevelNumber;
> + CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_EAX Eax;
> + CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_EBX Ebx;
> + CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_ECX Ecx;
> + UINT32 Edx;
> + UINT32 LevelNumber;
>
> - if (CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY > gMaximumBasicFunction) {
> + if (LeafFunction > gMaximumBasicFunction) {
> + return;
> + }
> + if ((LeafFunction != CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY) && (LeafFunction !=
> + CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION)) {
> return;
> }
>
> LevelNumber = 0;
> - do {
> + for (LevelNumber = 0; ; LevelNumber++) {
> AsmCpuidEx (
> - CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY, LevelNumber,
> + LeafFunction, LevelNumber,
> &Eax.Uint32, &Ebx.Uint32, &Ecx.Uint32, &Edx
> );
> - if (Eax.Bits.ApicIdShift != 0) {
> - Print (L"CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY (Leaf %08x, Sub-Leaf %08x)\n",
> CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY, LevelNumber);
> - Print (L" EAX:%08x EBX:%08x ECX:%08x EDX:%08x\n", Eax.Uint32,
> Ebx.Uint32, Ecx.Uint32, Edx);
> - PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Eax, ApicIdShift);
> - PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ebx, LogicalProcessors);
> - PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ecx, LevelNumber);
> - PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ecx, LevelType);
> - PRINT_VALUE (Edx, x2APIC_ID);
> + if (Ecx.Bits.LevelType ==
> CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_LEVEL_TYPE_INVALID) {
> + break;
> }
> - LevelNumber++;
> - } while (Eax.Bits.ApicIdShift != 0);
> + Print (
> + L"%a (Leaf %08x, Sub-Leaf %08x)\n",
> + LeafFunction == CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY ?
> "CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY" :
> "CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION-2",
> + LeafFunction, LevelNumber);
> + Print (L" EAX:%08x EBX:%08x ECX:%08x EDX:%08x\n", Eax.Uint32,
> Ebx.Uint32, Ecx.Uint32, Edx);
> + PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Eax, BitsNum);
> + PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ebx, ProcessorsNum);
> + PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ecx, LevelNum);
> + PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ecx, LevelType);
> + PRINT_VALUE (Edx, x2APIC_ID);
The name for above fields are different in CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY and CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION,
So I think above print are not correct for CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY, right?
Thanks,
Eric
> + }
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1385,39 +1391,6 @@ CpuidDeterministicAddressTranslationParameters
> (
> PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Edx, MaximumNum);
> }
>
> -/**
> - Display CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION main leaf and
> sub-leafs.
> -
> -**/
> -VOID
> -CpuidV2ExtendedTopologyEnumeration (
> - VOID
> - )
> -{
> - CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_EAX Eax;
> - CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_EBX Ebx;
> - CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_ECX Ecx;
> - UINT32 Edx;
> -
> - if (CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION >
> gMaximumBasicFunction) {
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - AsmCpuidEx (
> - CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION,
> - CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_MAIN_LEAF,
> - &Eax.Uint32, &Ebx.Uint32, &Ecx.Uint32, &Edx
> - );
> - Print (L"CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION (Leaf %08x,
> Sub-Leaf %08x)\n", CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION,
> CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION_MAIN_LEAF);
> - Print (L" EAX:%08x EBX:%08x ECX:%08x EDX:%08x\n", Eax.Uint32,
> Ebx.Uint32, Ecx.Uint32, Edx);
> -
> - PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Eax, BitsNum);
> - PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ebx, ProcessorsNum);
> - PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ecx, LevelNum);
> - PRINT_BIT_FIELD (Ecx, LevelType);
> - PRINT_VALUE (Edx, x2APICID);
> -}
> -
> /**
> Display CPUID_EXTENDED_FUNCTION leaf.
>
> @@ -1619,7 +1592,7 @@ UefiMain (
> CpuidStructuredExtendedFeatureFlags ();
> CpuidDirectCacheAccessInfo();
> CpuidArchitecturalPerformanceMonitoring ();
> - CpuidExtendedTopology ();
> + CpuidExtendedTopology (CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY);
> CpuidExtendedStateMainLeaf ();
> CpuidIntelRdtMonitoringEnumerationSubLeaf ();
> CpuidIntelRdtMonitoringL3CacheCapabilitySubLeaf (); @@ -1630,7 +1603,7
> @@ UefiMain (
> CpuidProcessorFrequency ();
> CpuidSocVendor ();
> CpuidDeterministicAddressTranslationParameters ();
> - CpuidV2ExtendedTopologyEnumeration ();
> + CpuidExtendedTopology
> (CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ENUMERATION);
> CpuidExtendedFunction ();
> CpuidExtendedCpuSig ();
> CpuidProcessorBrandString ();
> --
> 2.21.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 8:41 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/Cpuid: Dump leaf 1FH information correctly Ray Ni
2019-04-03 6:39 ` Dong, Eric [this message]
2019-04-03 8:09 ` Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259DF8935@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox