From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: intel.com, ip: 192.55.52.136, mailfrom: eric.dong@intel.com) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by groups.io with SMTP; Fri, 31 May 2019 01:02:14 -0700 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 May 2019 01:02:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2019 01:02:13 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx122.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.37) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 31 May 2019 01:02:12 -0700 Received: from shsmsx106.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.159) by fmsmsx122.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 31 May 2019 01:02:12 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.134]) by SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.113]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 31 May 2019 16:02:10 +0800 From: "Dong, Eric" To: "Yao, Jiewen" , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , "Gao, Liming" , "Kubacki, Michael A" , "Oram, Isaac W" , "Kinney, Michael D" Subject: Re: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory] Thread-Topic: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory] Thread-Index: AQHVF4VesjHIV4fYq02QttUGV8OTt6aE3T9w Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 08:02:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F67FA7A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F67FA7A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: eric.dong@intel.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259E494C2shsmsx102ccrcor_" --_000_ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259E494C2shsmsx102ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jiewen, I think SecuritySamplePkg used to save 1) sample implementation for securit= y related features, 2) it's platform scope feature. SecurityPkg used to save 1) common security features, 2) It's not a sample = implementation. This is just my proposal, If you have better one, you can raise here. Thanks, Eric From: Yao, Jiewen Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:49 PM To: Dong, Eric ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming ; Kubacki, Michael A ; Oram= , Isaac W ; Kinney, Michael D Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel direct= ory] Would you please clarify the position of SecuritySamplePkg ? What is the difference between SecurityPkg and SecuritySamplePkg ? Thank you Yao Jiewen From: Dong, Eric Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:46 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming >; Kubacki, Michael A >; Oram, Isaac W >; Kinney, Michael D >; Yao, Jiewen > Subject: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory] Isaac, Jiewen & Mike, I plan to add a new driver named UserAuthentication. This driver shows a sa= mple implementation about how to control user enter setup page. I plan to a= dd a new package in Platform\Intel folder to save this driver. New package = name is SecuritySamplePkg. Any comments for this RFC? Thanks, Eric _._,_._,_ --_000_ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259E494C2shsmsx102ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jiewen,<= /span>

 

I think SecuritySample= Pkg used to save 1) sample implementation for security related features, 2)= it’s platform scope feature.

SecurityPkg used to sa= ve 1) common security features, 2) It’s not a sample implementation.<= o:p>

 

This is just my propos= al, If you have better one, you can raise here.

 

Thanks,

Eric=

From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:49 PM
To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Ga= o, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.ku= backi@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Kinney, = Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel= directory]

 

Would= you please clarify the position of SecuritySamplePkg ?<= /p>

 

What is the difference= between SecurityPkg and SecuritySamplePkg ?

=  

Thank= you

Yao J= iewen

 

From: Don= g, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:46 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io= ; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.= com>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.c= om>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel dir= ectory]

 

Isaac, Jiewen & Mi= ke,

 

I plan to add a new dr= iver named UserAuthentication. This driver shows a sample implementation ab= out how to control user enter setup page. I plan to add a new package in Pl= atform\Intel folder to save this driver. New package name is SecuritySamplePkg. Any comments for this RFC?

 

Thanks,

Eric=

_._,_._,_

--_000_ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259E494C2shsmsx102ccrcor_--