From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add "Test Then Write" Macros.
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:58:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259EC3552@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E4D22AB@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Liming & Star,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 11:44 AM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Yao,
> Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [Patch v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add "Test
> Then Write" Macros.
>
> Eric:
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Dong, Eric
> >Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 10:20 AM
> >To: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> >Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Yao,
> >Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>;
> >Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> >Subject: RE: [Patch v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add
> >"Test Then Write" Macros.
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Zeng, Star
> >> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 10:08 AM
> >> To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> >> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>;
> >> Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Gao, Liming
> >> <liming.gao@intel.com>;
> >Kinney,
> >> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
> >> <star.zeng@intel.com>
> >> Subject: RE: [Patch v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add
> >> "Test Then Write" Macros.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Dong, Eric
> >> > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 9:27 AM
> >> > To: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> >> > Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> >> > Subject: RE: [Patch v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add
> >> > "Test Then Write" Macros.
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Zeng, Star
> >> > > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 9:15 AM
> >> > > To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> >> > > Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>;
> >> > > Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> >> > > Subject: RE: [Patch v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib:
> >> > > Add "Test Then Write" Macros.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > From: Dong, Eric
> >> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 10:51 AM
> >> > > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> >> > > > Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> >> > > > <lersek@redhat.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> >> > > > Subject: [Patch v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add
> >> > > > "Test Then Write" Macros.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Add below new micros which test the current value before write
> >> > > > the new value. Only write new value when current value not same
> >> > > > as new
> >> > value.
> >> > > > CPU_REGISTER_TABLE_TEST_THEN_WRITE32
> >> > > > CPU_REGISTER_TABLE_TEST_THEN_WRITE64
> >> > > > CPU_REGISTER_TABLE_TEST_THEN_WRITE_FIELD
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Also add below API:
> >> > > > CpuRegisterTableTestThenWrite
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> >> > > > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> >> > > > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> >> > > > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > > UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h | 1 +
> >> > > > .../Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h | 91
> >> > +++++++++++++++++++
> >> > > > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 45 ++++++++-
> >> > > > 3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h
> >> > > > b/UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h
> >> > > > index b963a2f592..472a1a8070 100644
> >> > > > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h
> >> > > > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Include/AcpiCpuData.h
> >> > > > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ typedef struct {
> >> > > > UINT16 Reserved; // offset 10 - 11
> >> > > > UINT32 HighIndex; // offset 12-15, only valid for
> >> > MemoryMapped
> >> > > > UINT64 Value; // offset 16-23
> >> > > > + UINT8 TestThenWrite; // 0ffset 24
> >> > >
> >> > > Could we use one byte of the Reserved field, but not add new field?
> >> > > And use BOOLEAN type for it?
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure whether use the Reserved field is an correct approach,
> >> > do you have samples which use the reserved fields?
> >> > But I think add new field is a more safe one.
> >>
> >> What "more safe" means here? Adding new field extends the structure,
> >from
> >> the structure layout view of point, it is an incompatible change, the
> >> structure size is not just from 24 to 25 bytes, but to be nature
> >> aligned, the structure
> >size
> >> will be (24 + 8) 32. Since there is Reserved field can be reused,
> >> that size
> >impact
> >> can be removed.
> >
> >Yes, agree the size impact. I'm just not clear whether the Reserved
> >field can be used. Whether it has compatible impact.
> >
> >>
> >> FspGlobalData.h:
> >> SHA-1: a2e61f341d26a78751b2f19b5004c6bbfc8b4fa9
> >> * IntelFsp2Pkg: Support FSP Dispatch mode
> >>
> >> MemoryProfile.h
> >> SHA-1: 072a3ca1d36a42aec97f871c808776ee7038ca06 (related to
> >> 94092aa60341a3e4b1e1ea7c362781b8404ac538)
> >> * MdeModulePkg MemoryProfile.h:two bytes of Reserved[4] as
> >> ActionStringOffset
> >>
> >
> >If so many examples already did it. I think we can also do it.
> >
> >>
> >> If needed, more comments from Ray, Laszlo, Jiewen, Liming and Mike
> >> will
> >be
> >> better.
> >
> >Yes, I think we need get more comments from them.
>
> I think to reuse the reserved field is a good solution.
>
Thanks for this valuable input, I will send V4 patch to use Reserved field.
Thanks,
Eric
> Thanks
> Liming
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Eric
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Star
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Eric
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Star
> >> > >
> >> > > > } CPU_REGISTER_TABLE_ENTRY;
> >> > > >
> >> > > > //
> >> > > > diff --git
> >> > > > a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> >> > > > b/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> >> > > > index e420e7f075..5bd464b32e 100644
> >> > > > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> >> > > > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> >> > > > @@ -348,6 +348,32 @@ CpuRegisterTableWrite (
> >> > > > IN UINT64 Value
> >> > > > );
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +/**
> >> > > > + Adds an entry in specified register table.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + This function adds an entry in specified register table,
> >> > > > + with given register type, register index, bit section and value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + Driver will test the current value before setting new value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @param[in] ProcessorNumber The index of the CPU to add a
> >> > > > + register
> >> > > > table entry
> >> > > > + @param[in] RegisterType Type of the register to program
> >> > > > + @param[in] Index Index of the register to program
> >> > > > + @param[in] ValueMask Mask of bits in register to write
> >> > > > + @param[in] Value Value to write
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @note This service could be called by BSP only.
> >> > > > +**/
> >> > > > +VOID
> >> > > > +EFIAPI
> >> > > > +CpuRegisterTableTestThenWrite (
> >> > > > + IN UINTN ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > + IN REGISTER_TYPE RegisterType,
> >> > > > + IN UINT64 Index,
> >> > > > + IN UINT64 ValueMask,
> >> > > > + IN UINT64 Value
> >> > > > + );
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > /**
> >> > > > Adds an entry in specified Pre-SMM register table.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > @@ -390,6 +416,26 @@ PreSmmCpuRegisterTableWrite (
> >> > > > CpuRegisterTableWrite (ProcessorNumber, RegisterType,
> >> > > > Index, MAX_UINT32, Value); \
> >> > > > } while(FALSE);
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +/**
> >> > > > + Adds a 32-bit register write entry in specified register table.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + This macro adds an entry in specified register table, with
> >> > > > + given register type, register index, and value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + Driver will test the current value before setting new value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @param[in] ProcessorNumber The index of the CPU to add a
> >> > > > + register
> >> > > > table entry.
> >> > > > + @param[in] RegisterType Type of the register to program
> >> > > > + @param[in] Index Index of the register to program
> >> > > > + @param[in] Value Value to write
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @note This service could be called by BSP only.
> >> > > > +**/
> >> > > > +#define
> >> > CPU_REGISTER_TABLE_TEST_THEN_WRITE32(ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > RegisterType, Index, Value) \
> >> > > > + do { \
> >> > > > + CpuRegisterTableTestThenWrite (ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > +RegisterType, Index, MAX_UINT32, Value); \
> >> > > > + } while(FALSE);
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > /**
> >> > > > Adds a 64-bit register write entry in specified register table.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > @@ -408,6 +454,26 @@ PreSmmCpuRegisterTableWrite (
> >> > > > CpuRegisterTableWrite (ProcessorNumber, RegisterType,
> >> > > > Index, MAX_UINT64, Value); \
> >> > > > } while(FALSE);
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +/**
> >> > > > + Adds a 64-bit register write entry in specified register table.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + This macro adds an entry in specified register table, with
> >> > > > + given register type, register index, and value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + Driver will test the current value before setting new value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @param[in] ProcessorNumber The index of the CPU to add a
> >> > > > + register
> >> > > > table entry.
> >> > > > + @param[in] RegisterType Type of the register to program
> >> > > > + @param[in] Index Index of the register to program
> >> > > > + @param[in] Value Value to write
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @note This service could be called by BSP only.
> >> > > > +**/
> >> > > > +#define
> >> > CPU_REGISTER_TABLE_TEST_THEN_WRITE64(ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > RegisterType, Index, Value) \
> >> > > > + do { \
> >> > > > + CpuRegisterTableTestThenWrite (ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > +RegisterType, Index, MAX_UINT64, Value); \
> >> > > > + } while(FALSE);
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > /**
> >> > > > Adds a bit field write entry in specified register table.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > @@ -431,6 +497,31 @@ PreSmmCpuRegisterTableWrite (
> >> > > > CpuRegisterTableWrite (ProcessorNumber, RegisterType, Index,
> >> > > > ~ValueMask, Value); \
> >> > > > } while(FALSE);
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +/**
> >> > > > + Adds a bit field write entry in specified register table.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + This macro adds an entry in specified register table, with
> >> > > > + given register type, register index, bit field section, and value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + Driver will test the current value before setting new value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @param[in] ProcessorNumber The index of the CPU to add a
> >> > > > + register
> >> > > > table entry.
> >> > > > + @param[in] RegisterType Type of the register to program.
> >> > > > + @param[in] Index Index of the register to program.
> >> > > > + @param[in] Type The data type name of a register structure.
> >> > > > + @param[in] Field The bit fiel name in register structure to
> >write.
> >> > > > + @param[in] Value Value to write to the bit field.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @note This service could be called by BSP only.
> >> > > > +**/
> >> > > > +#define
> >> > > > CPU_REGISTER_TABLE_TEST_THEN_WRITE_FIELD(ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > RegisterType, Index, Type, Field, Value) \
> >> > > > + do { \
> >> > > > + UINT64 ValueMask; \
> >> > > > + ValueMask = MAX_UINT64;
> >> \
> >> > > > + ((Type *)(&ValueMask))->Field = 0;
> >> > \
> >> > > > + CpuRegisterTableTestThenWrite (ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > + RegisterType, Index,
> >> > > > ~ValueMask, Value); \
> >> > > > + } while(FALSE);
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > /**
> >> > > > Adds a 32-bit register write entry in specified register table.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > diff --git
> >> > > >
> >a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib
> >> > > > .c
> >> > > >
> >b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib
> >> > > > .c index 67885bf69b..e9769882b9 100644
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >
> >a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib
> >> > > > .c
> >> > > > +++
> >> > > >
> >b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib
> >> > > > .c @@ -1025,6 +1025,8 @@ EnlargeRegisterTable (
> >> > > > @param[in] ValidBitStart Start of the bit section
> >> > > > @param[in] ValidBitLength Length of the bit section
> >> > > > @param[in] Value Value to write
> >> > > > + @param[in] TestThenWrite Whether need to test current Value
> >> > before
> >> > > > writing.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > **/
> >> > > > VOID
> >> > > > CpuRegisterTableWriteWorker (
> >> > > > @@ -1034,7 +1036,8 @@ CpuRegisterTableWriteWorker (
> >> > > > IN UINT64 Index,
> >> > > > IN UINT8 ValidBitStart,
> >> > > > IN UINT8 ValidBitLength,
> >> > > > - IN UINT64 Value
> >> > > > + IN UINT64 Value,
> >> > > > + IN UINT8 TestThenWrite
> >> > > > )
> >> > > > {
> >> > > > CPU_FEATURES_DATA *CpuFeaturesData;
> >> > > > @@ -1070,6 +1073,7 @@ CpuRegisterTableWriteWorker (
> >> > > > RegisterTableEntry[RegisterTable->TableLength].ValidBitStart
> >> > > > = ValidBitStart;
> >> > > >
> >> > > > RegisterTableEntry[RegisterTable->TableLength].ValidBitLength =
> ValidBitLength;
> >> > > > RegisterTableEntry[RegisterTable->TableLength].Value = Value;
> >> > > > + RegisterTableEntry[RegisterTable->TableLength].TestThenWrite
> >> > > > + = TestThenWrite;
> >> > > >
> >> > > > RegisterTable->TableLength++; } @@ -1105,7 +1109,42 @@
> >> > > > CpuRegisterTableWrite (
> >> > > > Start = (UINT8)LowBitSet64 (ValueMask);
> >> > > > End = (UINT8)HighBitSet64 (ValueMask);
> >> > > > Length = End - Start + 1;
> >> > > > - CpuRegisterTableWriteWorker (FALSE, ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > RegisterType, Index, Start, Length, Value);
> >> > > > + CpuRegisterTableWriteWorker (FALSE, ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > +RegisterType, Index, Start, Length, Value, FALSE); }
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > +/**
> >> > > > + Adds an entry in specified register table.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + This function adds an entry in specified register table,
> >> > > > + with given register type, register index, bit section and value.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @param[in] ProcessorNumber The index of the CPU to add a
> >> > > > + register
> >> > > > table entry
> >> > > > + @param[in] RegisterType Type of the register to program
> >> > > > + @param[in] Index Index of the register to program
> >> > > > + @param[in] ValueMask Mask of bits in register to write
> >> > > > + @param[in] Value Value to write
> >> > > > + @param[in] TestThenWrite Whether need to test current Value
> >> > before
> >> > > > writing.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + @note This service could be called by BSP only.
> >> > > > +**/
> >> > > > +VOID
> >> > > > +EFIAPI
> >> > > > +CpuRegisterTableTestThenWrite (
> >> > > > + IN UINTN ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > + IN REGISTER_TYPE RegisterType,
> >> > > > + IN UINT64 Index,
> >> > > > + IN UINT64 ValueMask,
> >> > > > + IN UINT64 Value
> >> > > > + )
> >> > > > +{
> >> > > > + UINT8 Start;
> >> > > > + UINT8 End;
> >> > > > + UINT8 Length;
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + Start = (UINT8)LowBitSet64 (ValueMask);
> >> > > > + End = (UINT8)HighBitSet64 (ValueMask);
> >> > > > + Length = End - Start + 1;
> >> > > > + CpuRegisterTableWriteWorker (FALSE, ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > + RegisterType, Index, Start, Length, Value, TRUE);
> >> > > > }
> >> > > >
> >> > > > /**
> >> > > > @@ -1139,7 +1178,7 @@ PreSmmCpuRegisterTableWrite (
> >> > > > Start = (UINT8)LowBitSet64 (ValueMask);
> >> > > > End = (UINT8)HighBitSet64 (ValueMask);
> >> > > > Length = End - Start + 1;
> >> > > > - CpuRegisterTableWriteWorker (TRUE, ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > RegisterType, Index, Start, Length, Value);
> >> > > > + CpuRegisterTableWriteWorker (TRUE, ProcessorNumber,
> >> > > > + RegisterType, Index, Start, Length, Value, FALSE);
> >> > > > }
> >> > > >
> >> > > > /**
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > 2.21.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-16 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-15 2:50 [Patch v3 0/6] Add "test then write" mechanism Dong, Eric
2019-08-15 2:50 ` [Patch v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add "Test Then Write" Macros Dong, Eric
2019-08-16 1:14 ` Zeng, Star
2019-08-16 1:27 ` Dong, Eric
2019-08-16 2:08 ` Zeng, Star
2019-08-16 2:20 ` Dong, Eric
2019-08-16 3:44 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-16 3:58 ` Dong, Eric [this message]
2019-08-15 2:50 ` [Patch v3 2/6] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Combine CR read/write action Dong, Eric
2019-08-15 2:50 ` [Patch v3 3/6] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Supports test then write new value logic Dong, Eric
2019-08-15 2:50 ` [Patch v3 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Combine CR read/write action Dong, Eric
2019-08-15 2:50 ` [Patch v3 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Supports test then write new value logic Dong, Eric
2019-08-15 2:50 ` [Patch v3 6/6] UefiCpuPkg/CpuCommonFeaturesLib: Use new macros Dong, Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259EC3552@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox