From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>,
"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"Wei, David Y" <david.y.wei@intel.com>,
"Agyeman, Prince" <prince.agyeman@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg: Add missing components to UefiCpuPkg.dsc
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:28:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259F18F13@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9DF0871@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Mike and Laszlo,
I agree with Mike's proposal. We can submit new bugz to remove the binary.
Thanks,
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Kinney, Michael D
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 7:39 AM
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wei, David Y <david.y.wei@intel.com>; Agyeman, Prince <prince.agyeman@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg: Add missing components to UefiCpuPkg.dsc
Laszlo,
Can we move forward with this patch and enter a new BZ to remove the binary module?
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 4:27 PM
> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>; Dong, Eric
> <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wei, David Y
> <david.y.wei@intel.com>; Agyeman, Prince <prince.agyeman@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg: Add missing components to
> UefiCpuPkg.dsc
>
> (+David, +Prince)
>
> On 10/23/19 01:13, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> > Laszlo,
> >
> > I see 2 usages of this module in edk2-platforms:
> >
> > edk2-
> platforms\Silicon\Intel\SimicsX58SktPkg\SktPkgPei.dsc(13
> ):
> > UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/Bin/ResetVector.inf
> >
> > edk2-
> platforms\Silicon\Intel\SimicsX58SktPkg\SktSecInclude.fd
> f(16):INF
> > RuleOverride=RESET_VECTOR USE = IA32
> > UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/Bin/ResetVector.inf
>
> Can we update those platforms to build the reset vector from source?
>
> Embedding a binary blob seems wrong in its own right...
>
> Anyway, if Ray and/or Eric are OK with the present patch, I won't try
> to block it.
>
> Thanks,
> Laszlo
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 3:57 PM
> >> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> >> devel@edk2.groups.io
> >> Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>; Dong,
> Eric
> >> <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg: Add missing
> components to
> >> UefiCpuPkg.dsc
> >>
> >> On 10/22/19 21:06, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> >>> From: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
> >>>
> >>> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255
> >>>
> >>> Update UefiCpuPkg.dsc to guarantee all libraries and
> >> modules are
> >>> always built. Add the following components.
> >>>
> >>> * UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/Bin/ResetVector.inf
> >>> *
> >>
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/CpuCommonFeature
> >> sLib.inf
> >>>
> >>> ResetVector.inf is a binary INF, so no source builds
> >> are triggered
> >>> from adding this line. However, a build with this
> >> component does
> >>> verify the contents of the INF file.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney
> >> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dsc | 2 ++
> >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dsc
> >> b/UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dsc
> >>> index e7dfe30eda..d28cb5cccb 100644
> >>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dsc
> >>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dsc
> >>> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ [Components.IA32,
> Components.X64]
> >>>
> >> UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseUefiCpuLib/BaseUefiCpuLib.inf
> >>> UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicLib/BaseXApicLib.inf
> >>>
> >>
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicX2ApicLib/BaseXApicX2ApicLib
> >> .inf
> >>> +
> >>
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/CpuCommonFeature
> >> sLib.inf
> >>>
> >>
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/DxeCpuExceptio
> >> nHandlerLib.inf
> >>>
> >>
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/SecPeiCpuExcep
> >> tionHandlerLib.inf
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/SmmCpuExceptio
> >> nHandlerLib.in
> >>> f @@ -146,6 +147,7 @@ [Components.IA32,
> >> Components.X64]
> >>>
> >>
> SmmCpuFeaturesLib|UefiCpuPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/S
> >> mmCpuFeaturesLibStm.inf
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>
> UefiCpuPkg/Universal/Acpi/S3Resume2Pei/S3Resume2Pei.inf
> >>> + UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/Bin/ResetVector.inf
> >>>
> >>> [BuildOptions]
> >>> *_*_*_CC_FLAGS = -D
> >> DISABLE_NEW_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can we retire
> >>
> >> UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/Bin/
> >>
> >> instead (in a separate patch)?
> >>
> >> Because, according to
> >>
> >> git log --stat master --
> >> UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/Bin/
> >>
> >> the most recent commit in which we updated the *.raw
> files has been
> >> f7bb98019a71 ("UefiCpuPkg VTF0: Fix support for
> finding SEC image of
> >> type TE.", 2011-09-28).
> >>
> >> I doubt anyone consumes this (binary) module, since
> Jordan's commits
> >> - 5a1f324d946c ("UefiCpuPkg: Support building VTF0
> ResetVector during
> >> the EDK II build", 2014-08-18)
> >> - eee1d2ca9078 ("UefiCpuPkg VTF0 X64: Build page
> tables in NASM
> >> code", 2014-08-18).
> >>
> >> We've by now dropped all top-level *BinPkg package
> directories too.
> >>
> >> If we remove the Bin subdir, then we should probably
> >> remove:
> >> - Build.py
> >> - Tools/
> >> too.
> >>
> >> For the other addition (CpuCommonFeaturesLib): if
> that gets its own
> >> patch (after the removal of
> UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/Bin/), then
> >> please add
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> to it.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Laszlo
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-23 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-22 19:06 [Patch] UefiCpuPkg: Add missing components to UefiCpuPkg.dsc Michael D Kinney
2019-10-22 22:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 23:13 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-10-22 23:27 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 23:38 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-10-23 1:28 ` Dong, Eric [this message]
2019-10-23 15:15 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-10-23 16:06 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-10-23 16:08 ` Agyeman, Prince
2019-10-24 11:03 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 0:06 ` [edk2-devel] " Dong, Eric
2019-10-24 0:21 ` Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259F18F13@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox