From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Always get CPUID & PlatformID in MicrocodeDetect()
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:46:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259FC3087@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203003438.6724-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Wu, Hao A
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 8:35 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Always get CPUID & PlatformID in MicrocodeDetect()
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2498
Commit fd30b00707 updated the logic in function MicrocodeDetect() that will directly use the CPUID and PlatformID information from the 'CpuData'
field in the CPU_MP_DATA structure, instead of collecting these information for each processor via AsmCpuid() and AsmReadMsr64() calls respectively.
At that moment, this approach worked fine for APs. Since:
a) When the APs are waken up for the 1st time (1st MpInitLibInitialize()
entry at PEI phase), the function InitializeApData() will be called for
each AP and the CPUID and PlatformID information will be collected.
b) During the 2nd entry of MpInitLibInitialize() at DXE phase, when the
APs are waken up again, the function InitializeApData() will not be
called, which means the CPUID and PlatformID information will not be
collected. However, the below logics in MicrocodeDetect() function:
CurrentRevision = GetCurrentMicrocodeSignature ();
IsBspCallIn = (ProcessorNumber == (UINTN)CpuMpData->BspNumber) ? TRUE : FALSE;
if (CurrentRevision != 0 && !IsBspCallIn) {
//
// Skip loading microcode if it has been loaded successfully
//
return;
}
will ensure that the microcode detection and application will be
skipped due to the fact that such process has already been done in the
PEI phase.
But after commit 396e791059, which removes the above skip loading logic, the CPUID and PlatformID information on APs will be used upon the 2nd entry of the MpInitLibInitialize(). But since the CPUID and PlatformID information has not been collected, it will bring issue to the microcode detection process.
This commit will update the logic in MicrocodeDetect() back to always collecting the CPUID and PlatformID information explicitly.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
index b6675b9a60..67e214d463 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ MicrocodeDetect (
UINT32 InCompleteCheckSum32;
BOOLEAN CorrectMicrocode;
VOID *MicrocodeData;
+ MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID_REGISTER PlatformIdMsr;
UINT32 ThreadId;
BOOLEAN IsBspCallIn;
@@ -115,8 +116,18 @@ MicrocodeDetect (
}
ExtendedTableLength = 0;
- Eax.Uint32 = CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].ProcessorSignature;
- PlatformId = CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].PlatformId;
+ //
+ // Here data of CPUID leafs have not been collected into context
+ buffer, so // GetProcessorCpuid() cannot be used here to retrieve CPUID data.
+ //
+ AsmCpuid (CPUID_VERSION_INFO, &Eax.Uint32, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ //
+ // The index of platform information resides in bits 50:52 of MSR
+ IA32_PLATFORM_ID //
+ PlatformIdMsr.Uint64 = AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID);
+ PlatformId = (UINT8) PlatformIdMsr.Bits.PlatformId;
+
//
// Check whether AP has same processor with BSP.
--
2.12.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 0:34 [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Always get CPUID & PlatformID in MicrocodeDetect() Wu, Hao A
2020-02-03 0:55 ` [edk2-devel] " Siyuan, Fu
2020-02-03 1:02 ` Wu, Hao A
2020-02-03 1:04 ` Siyuan, Fu
2020-02-03 9:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-02-04 13:46 ` Dong, Eric [this message]
2020-02-06 1:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
2020-02-11 11:06 ` Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259FC3087@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox