Hi Jian:
    Patch is good to me.  Just one comment for coding style
If (AlgInfo->HashAll (FvBuffer, (UINTN)FvInfo[FvIndex].Length, FvHashValue) == FALSE)

Is it better to be if (!AlgInfo->HashAll (FvBuffer, (UINTN)FvInfo[FvIndex].Length, FvHashValue) )  ?


From: Wang, Jian J
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 1:34 PM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>; Hernandez Beltran, Jorge <jorge.hernandez.beltran@intel.com>; Han, Harry <harry.han@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/3] Common OBB verification feature

Thanks Jiewen. I'll add it with a few code style corrections.

Anyone else has any comments?

Regards,
Jian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 10:09 PM
> To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com<mailto:jian.j.wang@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
> Cc: Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com<mailto:chao.b.zhang@intel.com>>; Hernandez Beltran, Jorge
> <jorge.hernandez.beltran@intel.com<mailto:jorge.hernandez.beltran@intel.com>>; Han, Harry <harry.han@intel.com<mailto:harry.han@intel.com>>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/3] Common OBB verification feature
>
> Thanks Jian. Comment below:
>
> 1) My previous comment 8 is NOT addressed.
>
> Please add assert for "StoredHashFvPpi->FvNumber".
>   if (!EFI_ERROR(Status) && StoredHashFvPpi != NULL && StoredHashFvPpi-
> >FvNumber > 0) {
>
> With that fixed, reviewed-by: Jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
>
>
> Thank you
> Yao Jiewen
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wang, Jian J
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 9:59 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
> > Cc: Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com<mailto:chao.b.zhang@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen
> > <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; Hernandez Beltran, Jorge
> > <jorge.hernandez.beltran@intel.com<mailto:jorge.hernandez.beltran@intel.com>>; Han, Harry <harry.han@intel.com<mailto:harry.han@intel.com>>
> > Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] Common OBB verification feature
> >
> > >V4: change FV_HASH_FLAG_BOOT_MODE definition
> >
> > >V3: update per Jiewen's comments
> >
> > >V2: fix parameter description error found by ECC
> >
> > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617
> >
> > Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com<mailto:chao.b.zhang@intel.com>>
> > Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
> > Cc: "Hernandez Beltran, Jorge" <jorge.hernandez.beltran@intel.com<mailto:jorge.hernandez.beltran@intel.com>>
> > Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com<mailto:harry.han@intel.com>>
> >
> > Jian J Wang (3):
> >   SecurityPkg: add definitions for OBB verification
> >   SecurityPkg/FvReportPei: implement a common FV verifier and reporter
> >   SecurityPkg: add FvReportPei.inf in dsc for build validation
> >
> >  SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPei.c         | 416
> > ++++++++++++++++++
> >  SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPei.h         | 122 +++++
> >  SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPei.inf       |  57 +++
> >  SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPei.uni       |  14 +
> >  .../FvReportPei/FvReportPeiPeiExtra.uni       |  12 +
> >  .../Ppi/FirmwareVolumeInfoStoredHashFv.h      |  62 +++
> >  SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dec                   |   9 +
> >  SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dsc                   |   5 +
> >  8 files changed, 697 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPei.c
> >  create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPei.h
> >  create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPei.inf
> >  create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPei.uni
> >  create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/FvReportPei/FvReportPeiPeiExtra.uni
> >  create mode 100644
> > SecurityPkg/Include/Ppi/FirmwareVolumeInfoStoredHashFv.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1.windows.2