Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: Skip SMBASE configuration

["Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>]

Restatement here: we don't want to hide something, it's not my intention to do that (apologize if give you such impress). I appeal to everyone in community can have more *inclusion* to every patch contributor. 

Please don't bring any aggressive or suggestive words to comment someone or patch. Not everyone in the same mind, but we can become more inclusion, let's trust everyone in the community can be contribute to their fullest potential and deliver their best work. We welcome the differences, knowing it makes us better. 

Again, thanks all great comments!

Thanks,
Jiaxin 


> 
> > Hiding information, as a *basic modus operandi*,
> > is incompatible with open source development.
> 
> On point.
> I want that printed on a t-shirt.
> 
> > What pains me is the dishonest or at least mixed / sloppy messaging
> > about *what edk2 is*. Is it open source, or is it open development?
> 
> I have the same question.
> 
> Having to mail back and forth for weeks for (still incomplete!)
> information on why you want change the smbase workflow is clearly
> not "open development".
> 
> take care,
>   Gerd