public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>, "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Kumar, Rahul R" <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v9 0/6] Simplify SMM Relocation Process
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 01:06:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN0PR11MB61587E015E7DD8004FB3E33FFEA49@MN0PR11MB6158.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17443983D6ED8995.20300@groups.io>

Any more comments to patch series? If no objection, Ray, please help merge the patches.

Thanks,
Jiaxin



> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Wu, Jiaxin
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 2:16 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
> <star.zeng@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Gerd Hoffmann
> <kraxel@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v9 0/6] Simplify SMM Relocation Process
> 
> Existing SMBASE Relocation is in the PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver, which
> will relocate the SMBASE of each processor by setting the SMBASE
> field in the saved state map (at offset 7EF8h) to a new value.
> The RSM instruction reloads the internal SMBASE register with the
> value in SMBASE field when each time it exits SMM. All subsequent
> SMI requests will use the new SMBASE to find the starting address
> for the SMI handler (at SMBASE + 8000h).
> 
> Due to the default SMBASE for all x86 processors is 0x30000, the
> APs' 1st SMI for rebase has to be executed one by one to avoid
> the processors over-writing each other's SMM Save State Area (see
> existing SmmRelocateBases() function), which means the next AP has
> to wait for the previous AP to finish its 1st SMI, then it can call
> into its 1st SMI for rebase via Smi Ipi command, thus leading the
> existing SMBASE Relocation has to be running in series. Besides, it
> needs very complex code to handle the AP exit semaphore
> (mRebased[Index]), which will hook return address of SMM Save State
> so that semaphore code can be executed immediately after AP exits
> SMM for SMBASE relocation (see existing SemaphoreHook() function).
> 
> This series is to add the new SMM Base HOB for any PEI module to do
> the SmBase relocation ahead of PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver and store the
> relocated SmBase address in array for each Processors. When the
> SMBASE relocation happens in a PEI module, the PEI module shall
> produce the SMM_BASE_HOB in HOB database which tells the
> PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver (runs at a later phase) about the new SMBASE
> for each CPU thread. PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver installs the SMI handler
> at the SMM_BASE_HOB.SmBase[Index]+0x8000 for processor Index. When
> the HOB doesn't exist, PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver shall relocate and
> program the new SMBASE itself (keep existing SMBASE Relocation way).
> 
> With SMM Base Hob support, PiSmmCpuDxeSmm does not need the RSM
> instruction to do the SMBASE Relocation. SMBASE Register for each
> processors have already been programmed and all SMBASE address have
> recorded in SMM Base Hob. So the same default SMBASE Address
> (0x30000) will not be used, thus the processors over-writing each
> other's SMM Save State Area will not happen in PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver.
> This way makes the first SMI init can be executed in parallel and save
> boot time on multi-core system. Besides, Semaphore Hook code logic
> is also not required, which will greatly simplify the SMBASE
> Relocation flow.
> 
> Note:
> This is the new way that firmware can program the SMBASE
> independently of the RSM instruction. The PEI code performing
> this logic will not be open sourced, similarly to other things
> that are kept binary-only in the FSP. Due to the register
> difference in different vender, and it has not been documented
> in the Intel SDM yet, we need a new binary-only interface for
> SMM Base HOB.
> 
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Zeng Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
> 
> Jiaxin Wu (6):
>   UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Fix invalid InitializeMpSyncData call
>   UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Replace mIsBsp by mBspApicId check
>   UefiCpuPkg/SmmBaseHob.h: Add SMM Base HOB Data
>   UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Consume SMM Base Hob for SmBase info
>   UefiCpuPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: Skip SMBASE configuration
>   OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: Check SmBase relocation supported or not
> 
>  .../Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.c  |  10 +-
>  .../SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.inf        |   6 +-
>  UefiCpuPkg/Include/Guid/SmmBaseHob.h               |  75 ++++++++
>  .../Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesLib.h     |   2 +
>  .../SmmCpuFeaturesLib/IntelSmmCpuFeaturesLib.c     |  25 ++-
>  .../SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.inf        |   6 +-
>  .../SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLibStm.inf     |   3 +-
>  UefiCpuPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmStm.c      |   3 +-
>  .../StandaloneMmCpuFeaturesLib.inf                 |   6 +-
>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c                  |  31 +++-
>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c              |  25 ++-
>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.c         | 193
> ++++++++++++++++-----
>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h         |  26 ++-
>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.inf       |   3 +-
>  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dec                          |   5 +-
>  15 files changed, 356 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 UefiCpuPkg/Include/Guid/SmmBaseHob.h
> 
> --
> 2.16.2.windows.1
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


       reply	other threads:[~2023-02-20  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <17443983D6ED8995.20300@groups.io>
2023-02-20  1:06 ` Wu, Jiaxin [this message]
2023-02-20  1:14   ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v9 0/6] Simplify SMM Relocation Process Ni, Ray
2023-02-21  8:48     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-21  9:12       ` Ni, Ray
2023-02-21  9:45         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-03-06 11:13       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-03-06 11:43         ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-06 13:20           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-03-10  9:19             ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-03-10 10:01               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-03-10 10:17                 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-03-10 10:29                 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-03-10 11:19                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-03-13  5:50                 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-20  2:37   ` Michael D Kinney
2023-02-20  2:57     ` Ni, Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN0PR11MB61587E015E7DD8004FB3E33FFEA49@MN0PR11MB6158.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox