From: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"Kumar, Rahul R" <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>,
"Dong, Guo" <guo.dong@intel.com>,
"Rhodes, Sean" <sean@starlabs.systems>,
"Lu, James" <james.lu@intel.com>, "Guo, Gua" <gua.guo@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Abdul Lateef Attar <AbdulLateef.Attar@amd.com>,
Abner Chang <abner.chang@amd.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] Add SmmRelocationLib
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:56:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN0PR11MB6158A5AB114B2E4736A3F4C8FE102@MN0PR11MB6158.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: yyfqyxkmmhm4zse4zudk3ls2qv5zj4nqfemri4mbzcqgqnytp7@utiiolx257tw
Hi Gerd,
AMD version is not work for IA32X64 ovmf.
I checked the detailed: CpuSaveState->x64 is always used for OVMF no matter IA32 or X64, while AMD is not, which is decided by the MSR EFER_ADDRESS LMA bit check.
There is a potential issue/open in OVMF why need use the X64 CpuSaveState for IA32. Before this open resolved, I still prefer to keep use the ovmf specific lib instance.
Thanks,
Jiaxin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jiaxin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:16 PM
> To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
> <star.zeng@intel.com>; Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>; Dong,
> Guo <guo.dong@intel.com>; Rhodes, Sean <sean@starlabs.systems>; Lu,
> James <james.lu@intel.com>; Guo, Gua <gua.guo@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Abdul
> Lateef Attar <AbdulLateef.Attar@amd.com>; Abner Chang
> <abner.chang@amd.com>; Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] Add SmmRelocationLib
>
> As I documented in the comment:
>
> This patch provides the SmmRelocationLib library instance
> for OVMF to handle the logic difference, and it won't change
> the existing implementation code logic.
>
> But as I said, it depends on you. I will drop the OvmfPkg/SmmRelocationLib
> since confirmed we can use the ADM version for OVMF.
>
> Thanks,
> Jiaxin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 4:43 PM
> > To: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
> > Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
> > <star.zeng@intel.com>; Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>; Dong,
> > Guo <guo.dong@intel.com>; Rhodes, Sean <sean@starlabs.systems>; Lu,
> > James <james.lu@intel.com>; Guo, Gua <gua.guo@intel.com>; Ard
> Biesheuvel
> > <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Abdul
> > Lateef Attar <AbdulLateef.Attar@amd.com>; Abner Chang
> > <abner.chang@amd.com>; Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] Add SmmRelocationLib
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:31:18AM +0000, Wu, Jiaxin wrote:
> > > Thanks Gerd, I will try the S3 on OVMF.
> > >
> > > And for AmdSmmRelocationLib usage in OVMF, do you prefer:
> > > 1. use the AmdSmmRelocationLib directly in this patch set? Or
> > > 2. still keep the original to create the OvmfPkg/SmmRelocationLib, and
> clean
> > the code in the future patch?
> >
> > Clear preference for (1), why introduce OvmfPkg/SmmRelocationLib only to
> > delete it shortly thereafter?
> >
> > take care,
> > Gerd
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#118180): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118180
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105593568/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <17C74D78B0B952AD.15491@groups.io>
2024-04-18 8:02 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] Add SmmRelocationLib Wu, Jiaxin
2024-04-22 7:57 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-04-23 7:31 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2024-04-23 8:43 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-04-23 12:16 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2024-04-24 3:56 ` Wu, Jiaxin [this message]
2024-04-24 11:29 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-04-25 0:54 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2024-04-25 5:50 ` Ni, Ray
2024-04-25 6:58 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-04-26 6:07 ` Ni, Ray
2024-04-26 13:18 ` Lendacky, Thomas via groups.io
2024-04-18 8:03 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2024-04-19 3:35 ` Ni, Ray
2024-04-19 3:47 ` Chang, Abner via groups.io
2024-04-19 3:55 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2024-04-18 6:55 Wu, Jiaxin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MN0PR11MB6158A5AB114B2E4736A3F4C8FE102@MN0PR11MB6158.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox