public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	"Guenzel, Robert" <robert.guenzel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Bug fix in 5LPage handling
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:47:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN0PR11MB6158CCF48B7DCCFA95F0C11DFE159@MN0PR11MB6158.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR11MB163138C892B9BFA33B92FE348C079@MWHPR11MB1631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Glad to see this fix, could you add/include the existing Bugzilla in the comment?

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4168

Thanks,
Jiaxin



> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ni, Ray
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 8:57 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Guenzel, Robert <robert.guenzel@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Bug fix in 5LPage handling
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of
> Guenzel, Robert
> > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 9:51 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Bug fix in 5LPage handling
> >
> > When build in DEBUG, the code asserts that 5LPage support is there
> > when the physical address width is larger than 48.
> > In a RELEASE build it will just force LA57 to 1 in CR4
> > even if CPUID(7).ECX[16] says it is not supported.
> >
> > The hang (in the ASSERT) in DEBUG is not warranted as there are
> > legal configurations with CPUID(7).ECX[16](==LA57)=0
> > and with a physical address width of larger than 48 (like 52).
> >
> > This is also supported by this code:
> >
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDx
> eSmm/X64/PageTbl.c#L221
> > There (as long as physical address width is smaller or equal to 52)
> > any address width above 48 will be reduced to 48 and the
> > system can and will work without 5LPaging.
> >
> > The forced setting of LA57 in CR4 (in the absence of LA57 in CPUID(7).ECX)
> > is a spec violation and should not happen.
> >
> > Hence the proposed fix
> > a) removes the assert.
> > b) only returns TRUE from Is5LevelPagingNeeded if 5LPaging is actually
> >    supported by HW.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Guenzel mailto:robert.guenzel@intel.com
> > ---
> >  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > index 6587212f4e..f8b1ac31f1 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > @@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ Is5LevelPagingNeeded (
> >      ExtFeatureEcx.Bits.FiveLevelPage
> >      ));
> >
> > -  if (VirPhyAddressSize.Bits.PhysicalAddressBits > 4 * 9 + 12) {
> > -    ASSERT (ExtFeatureEcx.Bits.FiveLevelPage == 1);
> > +  if ((VirPhyAddressSize.Bits.PhysicalAddressBits > 4 * 9 + 12) &&
> > +      (ExtFeatureEcx.Bits.FiveLevelPage == 1)) {
> >      return TRUE;
> >    } else {
> >      return FALSE;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> > Intel Deutschland GmbH
> > Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
> > Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de>
> > Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva
> > Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
> > Registered Office: Munich
> > Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-30  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-10 13:50 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Bug fix in 5LPage handling Guenzel, Robert
2022-11-15 19:08 ` Michael D Kinney
2022-11-16  0:57 ` Ni, Ray
2022-11-30  0:47   ` Wu, Jiaxin [this message]
2022-12-13  8:40     ` [edk2-devel] " Zeng, Star
2022-12-13  9:04       ` Ni, Ray
2022-12-13 11:14         ` Zeng, Star

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN0PR11MB6158CCF48B7DCCFA95F0C11DFE159@MN0PR11MB6158.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox