From: "Michael D Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "Andrew Fish" <afish@apple.com>,
"Leif Lindholm" <leif@nuviainc.com>,
"Pankaj Bansal" <pankaj.bansal@oss.nxp.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-InfSpecification PATCH] Clarify statement on package ordering
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:02:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB44612A1D2469381E2BD2A48ED2890@MN2PR11MB4461.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603180438.25361-1-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On
> Behalf Of Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 11:05 AM
> To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
> Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <leif@nuviainc.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Pankaj Bansal
> <pankaj.bansal@oss.nxp.com>; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <philmd@redhat.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [edk2-InfSpecification PATCH]
> Clarify statement on package ordering
>
> The description of [Packages] sections states,
>
> > Packages must be listed in the order that may be
> required for specifying
> > include path statements for a compiler. For example,
> the
> > MdePkg/MdePkg.dec file must be listed before the
> > MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec file.
>
> Clarify that the listing order in [Packages] is only
> relevant for
> resolving header file name collisions between packages.
> Mention that such
> collisions are generally not expected. Remove the
> example about MdePkg and
> MdeModulePkg, because both of those are in edk2, and
> we'd certainly
> address a collision between those packages explicitly
> (e.g., by renaming
> one of the subject header files).
>
> Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
> Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Cc: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@oss.nxp.com>
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> (1) This is the one shot I'm willing to take. If
> it's not accepted,
> someone else will have to work on this. (I only
> meant to provide
> some wording ideas under Leif's patch; I don't
> have time for
> multiple iterations on an actual INF spec
> patch.)
>
> (2) Repo: https://github.com/lersek/edk2-
> InfSpecification
> Branch: pkgs_order
>
> (3) Rendered view:
>
> https://lersek.gitbook.io/laszlo-s-fork-of-the-
> edk-ii-module-information-
> inf/v/pkgs_order/3_edk_ii_inf_file_format/37_-packages-
> _sections#summary
>
> 3_edk_ii_inf_file_format/37_[packages]_sections.md | 15
> ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/3_edk_ii_inf_file_format/37_[packages]_sections.md
> b/3_edk_ii_inf_file_format/37_[packages]_sections.md
> index 17a8d91ec8aa..6f8b8b6dd250 100644
> --- a/3_edk_ii_inf_file_format/37_[packages]_sections.md
> +++ b/3_edk_ii_inf_file_format/37_[packages]_sections.md
> @@ -42,11 +42,16 @@ Defines the `[Packages]` section tag
> that is used in EDK II module INF files.
> Each entry in this section contains a directory name,
> forward slash character
> and the name of the DEC file contained in the directory
> name.
>
> -Packages must be listed in the order that may be
> required for specifying
> -include path statements for a compiler. For example,
> the _MdePkg/MdePkg.dec_
> -file must be listed before the
> `MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec` file. If there
> -are PCDs listed in the generated "As Built" INF, the
> packages that declare any
> -PCDs must be listed in this section.
> +The order in which packages are listed may be relevant.
> Said order specifies in
> +what order include path statements are generated for a
> compiler. This may help
> +resolve header file name collisions between packages
> (although such collisions
> +are normally not expected). For setting specific
> include path priorities, the
> +packages may be listed in matching order in the INF
> file. Listing a package
> +earlier will cause a compiler to consider include paths
> from that package
> +earlier.
> +
> +If there are PCDs listed in the generated "As Built"
> INF, the packages that
> +declare any PCDs must be listed in this section.
>
> Each package filename must be listed only once per
> section. Package filenames
> listed in architectural sections are not permitted to
> be listed in the common
> --
> 2.19.1.3.g30247aa5d201
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 18:04 [edk2-InfSpecification PATCH] Clarify statement on package ordering Laszlo Ersek
2020-06-04 6:25 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-09 12:33 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-06-04 23:02 ` Michael D Kinney [this message]
2020-06-09 19:28 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MN2PR11MB44612A1D2469381E2BD2A48ED2890@MN2PR11MB4461.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox