From: "Sheng Wei" <w.sheng@intel.com>
To: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>, "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Kumar, Rahul1" <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
"Feng, Roger" <roger.feng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Support detect SMM shadow stack overflow
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:33:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4479657FEF1C6C51D2E7669FE1619@MN2PR11MB4479.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4166320D06173E81CE0E55C78C619@BY5PR11MB4166.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Jiewen,
In current code, if SMM stack guard is enabled, there is a guard page at the top of SMM shadow stack.
If SMM shadow stack overflow Happens, it will touch the guard page, and trigger the #PF exception.
In this patch, I will check the PFAddress in SmiPFHandler(), if it belongs to the range of SMM shadow stack guard page, I will show the error message.
unit test:
I use recursive function to do the test. In each function call, it will push the return address to the SMM shadow stack.
When the loop reaches to a certain amount, it will finally touch the guard page, and trigger #PF exception.
Thank you
BR
Sheng Wei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Sent: 2021年3月26日 14:14
> To: Sheng, W <w.sheng@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo
> Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul1 <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>;
> Feng, Roger <roger.feng@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Support detect SMM
> shadow stack overflow
>
> Hi
> Would you please share the info on how you do unit test for the new added
> code?
>
> Thank you
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sheng, W <w.sheng@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 2:04 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>;
> > Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul1
> > <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Feng,
> > Roger <roger.feng@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Support detect SMM
> shadow
> > stack overflow
> >
> > Use SMM stack guard feature to detect SMM shadow stack overflow.
> >
> > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3280
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sheng Wei <w.sheng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> > Cc: Roger Feng <roger.feng@intel.com>
> > ---
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > index 07e7ea70de..6902584b1f 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > @@ -1016,6 +1016,7 @@ SmiPFHandler (
> > {
> > UINTN PFAddress;
> > UINTN GuardPageAddress;
> > + UINTN ShadowStackGuardPageAddress;
> > UINTN CpuIndex;
> >
> > ASSERT (InterruptType == EXCEPT_IA32_PAGE_FAULT); @@ -1032,7
> > +1033,7 @@ SmiPFHandler (
> > }
> >
> > //
> > - // If a page fault occurs in SMRAM range, it might be in a SMM
> > stack guard page,
> > + // If a page fault occurs in SMRAM range, it might be in a SMM
> > + stack/shadow
> > stack guard page,
> > // or SMM page protection violation.
> > //
> > if ((PFAddress >= mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase) && @@ -1040,10 +1041,16
> > @@ SmiPFHandler (
> > DumpCpuContext (InterruptType, SystemContext);
> > CpuIndex = GetCpuIndex ();
> > GuardPageAddress = (mSmmStackArrayBase + EFI_PAGE_SIZE +
> CpuIndex
> > * (mSmmStackSize + mSmmShadowStackSize));
> > + ShadowStackGuardPageAddress = (mSmmStackArrayBase +
> mSmmStackSize
> > + EFI_PAGE_SIZE + CpuIndex * (mSmmStackSize +
> mSmmShadowStackSize));
> > if ((FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuSmmStackGuard)) &&
> > (PFAddress >= GuardPageAddress) &&
> > (PFAddress < (GuardPageAddress + EFI_PAGE_SIZE))) {
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM stack overflow!\n"));
> > + } else if ((FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuSmmStackGuard)) &&
> > + (mSmmShadowStackSize > 0) &&
> > + (PFAddress >= ShadowStackGuardPageAddress) &&
> > + (PFAddress < (ShadowStackGuardPageAddress + EFI_PAGE_SIZE))) {
> > + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM shadow stack overflow!\n"));
> > } else {
> > if ((SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData &
> > IA32_PF_EC_ID) !=
> > 0) {
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM exception at execution (0x%lx)\n",
> > PFAddress));
> > --
> > 2.16.2.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-26 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 6:04 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Support detect SMM shadow stack overflow Sheng Wei
2021-03-26 6:13 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-03-26 6:33 ` Sheng Wei [this message]
2021-03-29 5:13 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-04-06 14:26 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-04-09 5:05 ` Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MN2PR11MB4479657FEF1C6C51D2E7669FE1619@MN2PR11MB4479.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox