The change can be either a separate patch, or be included in another patch that uses the PCD.

 

Thanks,

Ray

From: Chao Li <lichao@loongson.cn>
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 11:44 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>; Baoqi Zhang <zhangbaoqi@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v8 12/37] UefiCpuPkg: Add CPU exception library for LoongArch

 

Hi Ray,

 

Thanks,
Chao

On 2024/2/2 11:30, Ni, Ray wrote:

 
1. Most of INF changes are not necessary for x86. Can you avoid them?

I just sorted them alphabetically, do you think it is unnecessary? If so, I will remove the changes in other patches in next time.

 
 
+  ## This PCD Contains the pointer to a CPU exception vector base address.
+  # @Prompt The pointer to a CPU exception vector base address.
+
gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuExceptionVectorBaseAddress|0x0|UINT
64|0x60000022
+
 
2. I do not see any reference to the above PCD in source/INF files.
Any mistake here?

This PCD is used in CpuDxe and MmuLib, among others. Do you think this change should be made as a separate patch?

 
 
 
 
 
_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#115016) | | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [rebecca@openfw.io]

_._,_._,_