public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Tan, Dun" <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
	"Kumar, Rahul R" <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V4 07/15] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add 2 function to disable/enable CR0.WP
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 00:46:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN6PR11MB824452E775EBBCD41140860D8C469@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8107814-8559-466b-7bf8-8d7249a9b4c5@gmail.com>

Kun,
Thanks for raising that up😊

We have some ideas. Will post them later.
Looking forward to work with community together.

Thanks,
Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 2:39 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Tan, Dun <dun.tan@intel.com>
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Kumar,
> Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V4 07/15] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm:
> Add 2 function to disable/enable CR0.WP
> 
> Hi Dun,
> 
> Thanks for your reply. That was helpful!
> 
> Just a follow-up question, is there any plan to support heap guard with
> PcdCpuSmmRestrictedMemoryAccess enabled after these changes? I think it
> would be a great value prop for the developers to have both features
> enabled during firmware validation process.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kun
> 
> On 5/23/2023 2:14 AM, duntan wrote:
> > Hi Kun,
> >
> > I've updated my answers in your original mail.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dun
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2023 10:00 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Tan, Dun <dun.tan@intel.com>
> > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Kumar,
> Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V4 07/15]
> UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add 2 function to disable/enable CR0.WP
> >
> > Hi Dun,
> >
> > Thanks for the notice on the other thread (v4 04/15).
> >
> > I have a few more questions on this specific patch (and a few associated
> commits related to it):
> >
> > Why would we allow page table manipulation after `mIsReadOnlyPageTable`
> is evaluated to TRUE?
> > Dun: `mIsReadOnlyPageTable` is a flag to indicate that current page table has
> been marked as RO and the new allocated pool should also be RO. We only
> need to clear Cr0.WP before modify page table.
> >
> >
> > As far as I can tell, `mIsReadOnlyPageTable` is set to TRUE inside
> `SetPageTableAttributes` function, but then we also have code in
> `InitializePageTablePool` to expect more page tables to be allocated.
> > Could you please let me when this would happen?
> > Dun: After `SetPageTableAttributes`, in
> 'SmmCpuFeaturesCompleteSmmReadyToLock()' API of different platform
> SmmCpuFeaturesLib, EDKII_SMM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PROTOCOL may be
> used to convert memory attribute. Also, in SMI handler after ReadyToLock,
> EDKII_SMM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PROTOCOL still may be used to convert
> memory attribute. During this process, if page split happens, new page table
> pool may be allocated.
> >
> >
> > I thought there would not be any new page table memory (i.e. memory
> attribute update) after ready to lock with restricted memory access option?
> With these change, it seems to be doable through
> EDKII_SMM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PROTOCOL now, is that correct? If so,
> would you mind shedding some light on what other behavior changes there
> might be?
> > Dun: Do you mean that we should check if ReadyToLock in
> EDKII_SMM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PROTOCOL implementation to make sure
> that page table won't be modified after ReadyToLock?
> > If is, as I mentioned above, page table still may be modified after
> ReadyToLock.
> >
> >
> > In addition, I might miss it in the patch series. If the newly allocated page
> memory is marked as read only after the above flag is set to TRUE, how would
> the callers able to use them?
> > Dun: Caller can clear the Cr0.WP before modifying the page table.
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kun
> >
> > On 5/16/2023 2:59 AM, duntan wrote:
> >> Add two functions to disable/enable CR0.WP. These two unctions will
> >> also be used in later commits. This commit doesn't change any
> >> functionality.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>    UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h         |  24
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>    UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmCpuMemoryManagement.c | 115
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++-------------------------------------------------
> >>    2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> >> b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> >> index ba341cadc6..e0c4ca76dc 100644
> >> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> >> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> >> @@ -1565,4 +1565,28 @@ SmmWaitForApArrival (
> >>      VOID
> >>      );
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> +  Disable Write Protect on pages marked as read-only if Cr0.Bits.WP is 1.
> >> +
> >> +  @param[out]  WpEnabled      If Cr0.WP is enabled.
> >> +  @param[out]  CetEnabled     If CET is enabled.
> >> +**/
> >> +VOID
> >> +DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (
> >> +  OUT BOOLEAN  *WpEnabled,
> >> +  OUT BOOLEAN  *CetEnabled
> >> +  );
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> +  Enable Write Protect on pages marked as read-only.
> >> +
> >> +  @param[out]  WpEnabled      If Cr0.WP should be enabled.
> >> +  @param[out]  CetEnabled     If CET should be enabled.
> >> +**/
> >> +VOID
> >> +EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (
> >> +  BOOLEAN  WpEnabled,
> >> +  BOOLEAN  CetEnabled
> >> +  );
> >> +
> >>    #endif
> >> diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmCpuMemoryManagement.c
> >> b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmCpuMemoryManagement.c
> >> index 2faee8f859..4b512edf68 100644
> >> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmCpuMemoryManagement.c
> >> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmCpuMemoryManagement.c
> >> @@ -40,6 +40,64 @@ PAGE_TABLE_POOL  *mPageTablePool = NULL;
> >>    //
> >>    BOOLEAN  mIsReadOnlyPageTable = FALSE;
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> +  Disable Write Protect on pages marked as read-only if Cr0.Bits.WP is 1.
> >> +
> >> +  @param[out]  WpEnabled      If Cr0.WP is enabled.
> >> +  @param[out]  CetEnabled     If CET is enabled.
> >> +**/
> >> +VOID
> >> +DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (
> >> +  OUT BOOLEAN  *WpEnabled,
> >> +  OUT BOOLEAN  *CetEnabled
> >> +  )
> >> +{
> >> +  IA32_CR0  Cr0;
> >> +
> >> +  *CetEnabled = ((AsmReadCr4 () & CR4_CET_ENABLE) != 0) ? TRUE :
> FALSE;
> >> +  Cr0.UintN   = AsmReadCr0 ();
> >> +  *WpEnabled  = (Cr0.Bits.WP != 0) ? TRUE : FALSE;  if (*WpEnabled) {
> >> +    if (*CetEnabled) {
> >> +      //
> >> +      // CET must be disabled if WP is disabled. Disable CET before clearing
> CR0.WP.
> >> +      //
> >> +      DisableCet ();
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    Cr0.Bits.WP = 0;
> >> +    AsmWriteCr0 (Cr0.UintN);
> >> +  }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> +  Enable Write Protect on pages marked as read-only.
> >> +
> >> +  @param[out]  WpEnabled      If Cr0.WP should be enabled.
> >> +  @param[out]  CetEnabled     If CET should be enabled.
> >> +**/
> >> +VOID
> >> +EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (
> >> +  BOOLEAN  WpEnabled,
> >> +  BOOLEAN  CetEnabled
> >> +  )
> >> +{
> >> +  IA32_CR0  Cr0;
> >> +
> >> +  if (WpEnabled) {
> >> +    Cr0.UintN   = AsmReadCr0 ();
> >> +    Cr0.Bits.WP = 1;
> >> +    AsmWriteCr0 (Cr0.UintN);
> >> +
> >> +    if (CetEnabled) {
> >> +      //
> >> +      // re-enable CET.
> >> +      //
> >> +      EnableCet ();
> >> +    }
> >> +  }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>    /**
> >>      Initialize a buffer pool for page table use only.
> >>
> >> @@ -62,10 +120,9 @@ InitializePageTablePool (
> >>      IN UINTN  PoolPages
> >>      )
> >>    {
> >> -  VOID      *Buffer;
> >> -  BOOLEAN   CetEnabled;
> >> -  BOOLEAN   WpEnabled;
> >> -  IA32_CR0  Cr0;
> >> +  VOID     *Buffer;
> >> +  BOOLEAN  WpEnabled;
> >> +  BOOLEAN  CetEnabled;
> >>
> >>      //
> >>      // Always reserve at least PAGE_TABLE_POOL_UNIT_PAGES, including
> >> one page for @@ -102,34 +159,9 @@ InitializePageTablePool (
> >>      // If page table memory has been marked as RO, mark the new pool
> pages as read-only.
> >>      //
> >>      if (mIsReadOnlyPageTable) {
> >> -    CetEnabled = ((AsmReadCr4 () & CR4_CET_ENABLE) != 0) ? TRUE : FALSE;
> >> -    Cr0.UintN  = AsmReadCr0 ();
> >> -    WpEnabled  = (Cr0.Bits.WP != 0) ? TRUE : FALSE;
> >> -    if (WpEnabled) {
> >> -      if (CetEnabled) {
> >> -        //
> >> -        // CET must be disabled if WP is disabled. Disable CET before clearing
> CR0.WP.
> >> -        //
> >> -        DisableCet ();
> >> -      }
> >> -
> >> -      Cr0.Bits.WP = 0;
> >> -      AsmWriteCr0 (Cr0.UintN);
> >> -    }
> >> -
> >> +    DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (&WpEnabled, &CetEnabled);
> >>        SmmSetMemoryAttributes ((EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)Buffer,
> EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (PoolPages), EFI_MEMORY_RO);
> >> -    if (WpEnabled) {
> >> -      Cr0.UintN   = AsmReadCr0 ();
> >> -      Cr0.Bits.WP = 1;
> >> -      AsmWriteCr0 (Cr0.UintN);
> >> -
> >> -      if (CetEnabled) {
> >> -        //
> >> -        // re-enable CET.
> >> -        //
> >> -        EnableCet ();
> >> -      }
> >> -    }
> >> +    EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (WpEnabled, CetEnabled);
> >>      }
> >>
> >>      return TRUE;
> >> @@ -1782,6 +1814,7 @@ SetPageTableAttributes (
> >>      VOID
> >>      )
> >>    {
> >> +  BOOLEAN  WpEnabled;
> >>      BOOLEAN  CetEnabled;
> >>
> >>      if (!IfReadOnlyPageTableNeeded ()) { @@ -1794,15 +1827,7 @@
> >> SetPageTableAttributes (
> >>      // Disable write protection, because we need mark page table to be write
> protected.
> >>      // We need *write* page table memory, to mark itself to be *read only*.
> >>      //
> >> -  CetEnabled = ((AsmReadCr4 () & CR4_CET_ENABLE) != 0) ? TRUE :
> >> FALSE;
> >> -  if (CetEnabled) {
> >> -    //
> >> -    // CET must be disabled if WP is disabled.
> >> -    //
> >> -    DisableCet ();
> >> -  }
> >> -
> >> -  AsmWriteCr0 (AsmReadCr0 () & ~CR0_WP);
> >> +  DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (&WpEnabled, &CetEnabled);
> >>
> >>      // Set memory used by page table as Read Only.
> >>      DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "Start...\n")); @@ -1811,20 +1836,12 @@
> >> SetPageTableAttributes (
> >>      //
> >>      // Enable write protection, after page table attribute updated.
> >>      //
> >> -  AsmWriteCr0 (AsmReadCr0 () | CR0_WP);
> >> +  EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (TRUE, CetEnabled);
> >>      mIsReadOnlyPageTable = TRUE;
> >>
> >>      //
> >>      // Flush TLB after mark all page table pool as read only.
> >>      //
> >>      FlushTlbForAll ();
> >> -
> >> -  if (CetEnabled) {
> >> -    //
> >> -    // re-enable CET.
> >> -    //
> >> -    EnableCet ();
> >> -  }
> >> -
> >>      return;
> >>    }
> >
> > 
> >
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-25  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-16  9:59 [Patch V4 00/15] Use CpuPageTableLib to create and update smm page table duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 01/15] OvmfPkg: Add CpuPageTableLib required by PiSmmCpuDxe duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 02/15] UefiPayloadPkg: " duntan
2023-05-16 10:01   ` Guo, Gua
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 03/15] OvmfPkg:Remove code that apply AddressEncMask to non-leaf entry duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 04/15] MdeModulePkg: Remove RO and NX protection when unset guard page duntan
2023-05-16 19:04   ` [edk2-devel] " Kun Qin
2023-05-17 10:16     ` duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 05/15] UefiCpuPkg: Use CpuPageTableLib to convert SMM paging attribute duntan
2023-06-01  1:09   ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 06/15] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Avoid setting non-present range to RO/NX duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 07/15] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add 2 function to disable/enable CR0.WP duntan
2023-05-20  2:00   ` [edk2-devel] " Kun Qin
2023-05-23  9:14     ` duntan
2023-05-24 18:39       ` Kun Qin
2023-05-25  0:46         ` Ni, Ray [this message]
2023-05-26  2:48           ` Kun Qin
2023-06-02  3:09   ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 08/15] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Clear CR0.WP before modify page table duntan
2023-06-02  3:12   ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 09/15] UefiCpuPkg: Extern mSmmShadowStackSize in PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h duntan
2023-06-02  3:16   ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2023-06-02  3:36     ` duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 10/15] UefiCpuPkg: Add GenSmmPageTable() to create smm page table duntan
2023-06-02  3:23   ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2023-06-02  3:36     ` duntan
2023-06-02  3:46       ` duntan
2023-06-02  5:08         ` Ni, Ray
2023-06-02  7:33           ` duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 11/15] UefiCpuPkg: Use GenSmmPageTable() to create Smm S3 " duntan
2023-06-02  3:31   ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2023-06-02  3:37     ` duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 12/15] UefiCpuPkg: Sort mSmmCpuSmramRanges in FindSmramInfo duntan
2023-06-02  3:33   ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2023-06-02  3:43     ` duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 13/15] UefiCpuPkg: Sort mProtectionMemRange when ReadyToLock duntan
2023-06-02  3:34   ` Ni, Ray
2023-06-02  3:35     ` Ni, Ray
2023-06-02  3:55       ` duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 14/15] UefiCpuPkg: Refinement to smm runtime InitPaging() code duntan
2023-06-02  3:54   ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2023-06-02  3:59     ` duntan
2023-05-16  9:59 ` [Patch V4 15/15] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Remove unnecessary function duntan
2023-06-02  3:55   ` Ni, Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN6PR11MB824452E775EBBCD41140860D8C469@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox