From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: "Tan, Dun" <dun.tan@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Kumar, Rahul R" <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm:Map SMRAM in 4K page granularity
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 01:23:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN6PR11MB8244BAE05D1DDE7767788E768C462@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240205140345.1437-4-dun.tan@intel.com>
> +
> + GenPageTable (&PageTable, PagingMode, 0, mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase);
> +
> + //
> + // Map smram range in 4K page granularity to avoid subsequent page split
> when smm ready to lock.
> + // If BSP are splitting the 1G/2M paging entries to 512 2M/4K paging
> entries, and all APs are
> + // still running in SMI at the same time, which might access the affected
> linear-address range
> + // between the time of modification and the time of invalidation access.
> That will be a potential
> + // problem leading exception happen.
> + //
> + ASSERT (mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase % SIZE_4KB == 0);
> + ASSERT (mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSize % SIZE_4KB == 0);
Can you please move the above 2 assertions in front of the
first call of GenPageTable() because SmrrBase is used there?
With that, Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> + GenPageTable (&PageTable, SmramPagingMode,
> mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase, mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSize);
> +
> + GenPageTable (&PageTable, PagingMode, mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase +
> mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSize, Length - mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase -
> mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSize);
>
> if (FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuSmmStackGuard)) {
> //
> @@ -1698,6 +1764,7 @@ GenSmmPageTable (
> for (Index = 0; Index < gSmmCpuPrivate-
> >SmmCoreEntryContext.NumberOfCpus; Index++) {
> GuardPage = mSmmStackArrayBase + EFI_PAGE_SIZE + Index *
> (mSmmStackSize + mSmmShadowStackSize);
> Status = ConvertMemoryPageAttributes (PageTable, PagingMode,
> GuardPage, SIZE_4KB, EFI_MEMORY_RP, TRUE, NULL);
> + ASSERT (Status == RETURN_SUCCESS);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1706,6 +1773,7 @@ GenSmmPageTable (
> // Mark [0, 4k] as non-present
> //
> Status = ConvertMemoryPageAttributes (PageTable, PagingMode, 0,
> SIZE_4KB, EFI_MEMORY_RP, TRUE, NULL);
> + ASSERT (Status == RETURN_SUCCESS);
> }
>
> return (UINTN)PageTable;
> --
> 2.31.1.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#115132): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/115132
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104176237/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-06 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 14:03 [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Fix potential issue in CpuPageTableLib and SMM page table initialization duntan
2024-02-05 14:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] UefiCpuPkg: Reduce and optimize access to attribute duntan
2024-02-06 1:20 ` Ni, Ray
2024-02-06 13:32 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-06 15:02 ` Ni, Ray
2024-02-06 17:34 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-02-07 0:47 ` Zhou, Jianfeng
2024-02-07 1:05 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-02-07 1:57 ` Zhou, Jianfeng
2024-02-07 17:52 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-02-07 20:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-08 2:29 ` Zhou, Jianfeng
2024-02-07 20:33 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-07 20:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-05 14:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] UefiCpuPkg: Add more Paging mode enumeration duntan
2024-02-06 1:21 ` Ni, Ray
2024-02-05 14:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm:Map SMRAM in 4K page granularity duntan
2024-02-06 1:23 ` Ni, Ray [this message]
2024-02-06 13:33 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-06 1:48 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Fix potential issue in CpuPageTableLib and SMM page table initialization Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MN6PR11MB8244BAE05D1DDE7767788E768C462@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox