Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v9 0/6] Simplify SMM Relocation Process

["Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>]

Gerd,
I also don't think some Pentium processors still use the latest edk2 code.
Can you create a bugzilla for the request?

If @Kinney, Michael D doesn't have concern, we can follow up on that old code removal.

Thanks,
Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 4:49 PM
> To: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Dong, Eric
> <eric.dong@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v9 0/6] Simplify SMM Relocation Process
> 
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 01:14:33AM +0000, Ni, Ray wrote:
> > I expect Gerd at least acknowledges all patches for UefiCpuPkg. Following
> three haven't got:
> >  * [PATCH v9 3/6] UefiCpuPkg/SmmBaseHob.h: Add SMM Base HOB Data
> >  * [PATCH v9 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Consume SMM Base
> Hob for SmBase info
> >  * [PATCH v9 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: Skip SMBASE
> configuration
> 
> I still think it is worth cleaning cleaning up and remove both code and
> comment for i486 and pentium processors from the last century.  That
> should reduce confusion of the already complex code.  But if you insist
> on not touching the existing code, so be it.
> 
> Series (for post-freeze merge):
> Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> 
> take care,
>   Gerd