public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: Nhi Pham <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "ardb+tianocore@kernel.org" <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	"sami.mujawar@arm.com" <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
	"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] StandaloneMmPkg/Core: Remove optimization for depex evaluation
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 03:05:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN6PR11MB8244E99924E49892EDAF9A958C752@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240119045646.3896430-1-nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>

Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>

PI spec does not define the REPLACE_TRUE op-code.
Existing dispatchers (DXE, SMM and Standalone MM) use REPLACE_TRUE to optimize the protocol evaluation. PEI dispatcher does not use this optimization as the Depex binary might be in flash.

Now this patch only modifies standalone MM version to not use the optimization. I think it's a right way.



Because the optimization cannot handle a case:
1. driver A installs protocol #a.
2. driver B depends on protocol #a.
3. driver A uninstalls the protocol #a in a callback (protocol callback, timer callback, or a service provided by A that driver B invokes)
4. driver B gets dispatched after the callback. <--- problem here. The protocol #a does not exist!!

@Kinney, Michael D, do you have history data of which optimization result it achieved? Do you think that the optimization can be in CoreLocateProtocol() instead of in the callers?

Thanks,
Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nhi Pham <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2024 12:57 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: ardb+tianocore@kernel.org; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>;
> sami.mujawar@arm.com; lersek@redhat.com; Nhi Pham
> <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] StandaloneMmPkg/Core: Remove optimization for
> depex evaluation
> 
> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> 
> The current dependency evaluator violates the memory access permission
> when patching depex grammar directly in the read-only depex memory area.
> 
> Laszlo pointed out the optimization issue in the thread (1) "Memory
> Attribute for depex section" and provided suggested patch to remove the
> perf optimization.
> 
> In my testing, removing the optimization does not make significant perf
> reduction. That makes sense that StandaloneMM dispatcher only searches
> in MM protocol database and does not depend on UEFI/DXE protocol
> database. Also, we don't have many protocols in StandaloneMM like
> UEFI/DXE.
> 
> From Laszlo,
> 
> "The patch removes the EFI_DEP_REPLACE_TRUE handling altogether, plus it
> CONST-ifies the Iterator pointer (which points into the DEPEX section),
> so that the compiler catch any possible accesses at *build time* that
> would write to the write-protected DEPEX memory area."
> 
> (1) https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/113531
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nhi Pham <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  StandaloneMmPkg/Core/Dependency.c | 37 ++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/StandaloneMmPkg/Core/Dependency.c
> b/StandaloneMmPkg/Core/Dependency.c
> index 440fe3e45238..2bcb07d34666 100644
> --- a/StandaloneMmPkg/Core/Dependency.c
> +++ b/StandaloneMmPkg/Core/Dependency.c
> @@ -13,16 +13,6 @@
> 
> 
>  #include "StandaloneMmCore.h"
> 
> 
> 
> -///
> 
> -/// EFI_DEP_REPLACE_TRUE - Used to dynamically patch the dependency
> expression
> 
> -///                        to save time.  A EFI_DEP_PUSH is
> evaluated one an
> 
> -///                        replaced with EFI_DEP_REPLACE_TRUE. If
> PI spec's Vol 2
> 
> -///                        Driver Execution Environment Core
> Interface use 0xff
> 
> -///                        as new DEPEX opcode.
> EFI_DEP_REPLACE_TRUE should be
> 
> -///                        defined to a new value that is not
> conflicting with PI spec.
> 
> -///
> 
> -#define EFI_DEP_REPLACE_TRUE  0xff
> 
> -
> 
>  ///
> 
>  /// Define the initial size of the dependency expression evaluation stack
> 
>  ///
> 
> @@ -170,12 +160,12 @@ MmIsSchedulable (
>    IN  EFI_MM_DRIVER_ENTRY  *DriverEntry
> 
>    )
> 
>  {
> 
> -  EFI_STATUS  Status;
> 
> -  UINT8       *Iterator;
> 
> -  BOOLEAN     Operator;
> 
> -  BOOLEAN     Operator2;
> 
> -  EFI_GUID    DriverGuid;
> 
> -  VOID        *Interface;
> 
> +  EFI_STATUS   Status;
> 
> +  CONST UINT8  *Iterator;
> 
> +  BOOLEAN      Operator;
> 
> +  BOOLEAN      Operator2;
> 
> +  EFI_GUID     DriverGuid;
> 
> +  VOID         *Interface;
> 
> 
> 
>    Operator  = FALSE;
> 
>    Operator2 = FALSE;
> 
> @@ -253,8 +243,7 @@ MmIsSchedulable (
>            Status = PushBool (FALSE);
> 
>          } else {
> 
>            DEBUG ((DEBUG_DISPATCH, "  PUSH GUID(%g) = TRUE\n",
> &DriverGuid));
> 
> -          *Iterator = EFI_DEP_REPLACE_TRUE;
> 
> -          Status    = PushBool (TRUE);
> 
> +          Status = PushBool (TRUE);
> 
>          }
> 
> 
> 
>          if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> 
> @@ -356,18 +345,6 @@ MmIsSchedulable (
>          DEBUG ((DEBUG_DISPATCH, "  RESULT = %a\n", Operator ?
> "TRUE" : "FALSE"));
> 
>          return Operator;
> 
> 
> 
> -      case EFI_DEP_REPLACE_TRUE:
> 
> -        CopyMem (&DriverGuid, Iterator + 1, sizeof (EFI_GUID));
> 
> -        DEBUG ((DEBUG_DISPATCH, "  PUSH GUID(%g) = TRUE\n",
> &DriverGuid));
> 
> -        Status = PushBool (TRUE);
> 
> -        if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> 
> -          DEBUG ((DEBUG_DISPATCH, "  RESULT = FALSE (Unexpected
> error)\n"));
> 
> -          return FALSE;
> 
> -        }
> 
> -
> 
> -        Iterator += sizeof (EFI_GUID);
> 
> -        break;
> 
> -
> 
>        default:
> 
>          DEBUG ((DEBUG_DISPATCH, "  RESULT = FALSE (Unknown
> opcode)\n"));
> 
>          goto Done;
> 
> --
> 2.25.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#114133): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/114133
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103824815/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/12367111/7686176/1913456212/xyzzy [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-22  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-19  4:56 [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] StandaloneMmPkg/Core: Remove optimization for depex evaluation Nhi Pham via groups.io
2024-01-19 10:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-01-19 11:51   ` levi.yun
2024-01-22  2:36     ` Nhi Pham via groups.io
2024-01-22  2:25   ` Nhi Pham via groups.io
2024-01-19 13:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-22  3:05 ` Ni, Ray [this message]
2024-01-22 23:30   ` Michael D Kinney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN6PR11MB8244E99924E49892EDAF9A958C752@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox