public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chaganty, Rangasai V" <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
To: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@outlook.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	"mikuback@linux.microsoft.com" <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg/PeiSmmAccessLib: Remove S3 requirement
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:15:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB4602130C44EB8967B31F3B44B6FF9@MW3PR11MB4602.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR07MB3440A9156147966AA5E2913DE9FF9@MWHPR07MB3440.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>

I've looked into Intel Platforms and we have atleast one platform that could potentially get impacted. However, it can be addressed by adding BootMode checks by the caller.
The more important question, as Ray pointed out is, are there security implications in installing these PPIs in normal boot, that justifies PeiSmmAccessLib to absorb the bootmode checks.
If there are then it would be interesting to see how to support rationale #1 below -  "Practical use cases exist to require this PPI in cases other than   the boot mode being set to BOOT_ON_S3_RESUME".

Regards,
Sai

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@outlook.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 11:47 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; mikuback@linux.microsoft.com; Chaganty, Rangasai V <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg/PeiSmmAccessLib: Remove S3 requirement

Jiewen/Sai, are you thinking about this?

Thanks,
Michael

On 8/12/2021 1:20 AM, Ni, Ray wrote:
> Michael,
> I need Jiewen's input on why MmAccess and MmCommunication PPIs were not installed in normal boot path. Without understanding the reason, I don't have confidence to approve the change.
> 
> Sai,
> Do you see other impacts to Intel platforms with this behavior change?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ray
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Michael 
> Kubacki
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 11:36 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Chaganty, 
> Rangasai V <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1] 
> IntelSiliconPkg/PeiSmmAccessLib: Remove S3 requirement
> 
> Installation is a platform decision. The buried dependency on boot mode in this particular function is just a roadblock platforms have to work around. The role of this API is to install the PPI.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michael
> 
> On 8/9/2021 9:47 PM, Ni, Ray wrote:
>> Michael,
>> Allowing the gPeiSmmAccessPpiGuid PPI installation in normal boot 
>> will further allow gEfiPeiSmmCommunicationPpiGuid installation in normal path, while without your change neither of the PPIs is installed in normal boot.
>>
>> + Jiewen for potential security concern.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ray
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chaganty, Rangasai V <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 6:46 AM
>>> To: mikuback@linux.microsoft.com; devel@edk2.groups.io
>>> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
>>> Subject: RE: [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1]
>>> IntelSiliconPkg/PeiSmmAccessLib: Remove S3 requirement
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Sai Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mikuback@linux.microsoft.com <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2021 6:40 AM
>>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>>> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Chaganty, Rangasai V 
>>> <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
>>> Subject: [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1]
>>> IntelSiliconPkg/PeiSmmAccessLib: Remove S3 requirement
>>>
>>> From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>>>
>>> REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3539
>>>
>>> PeiInstallSmmAccessPpi() currently requires the boot mode be set to S3 to actually install gEfiPeiMmAccessPpiGuid.
>>>
>>> This change removes this requirement in the function implementation for two reasons:
>>>
>>> 1. Practical use cases exist to require this PPI in cases other than
>>>      the boot mode being set to BOOT_ON_S3_RESUME.
>>>
>>> 2. It is poor API design to implicitly bury this requirement within
>>>      a function whose responsibility is to install the PPI. The caller
>>>      can easily place arbitrary constraints around whether to call
>>>      based on conditions such as the boot mode being
>>>      BOOT_ON_S3_RESUME.
>>>
>>> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>>> ---
>>>    Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/SmmAccess/Library/PeiSmmAccessLib/PeiSmmAccessLib.c | 12 ------------
>>>    1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/SmmAccess/Library/PeiSmmAcce
>>> s
>>> sLib/PeiSmmAccessLib.c
>>> b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/SmmAccess/Library/PeiSmmAcce
>>> s sLib/PeiSmmAccessLib.c index d9bf4fba983e..4df0d695fdaf 100644
>>> ---
>>> a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/SmmAccess/Library/PeiSmmAcce
>>> s
>>> sLib/PeiSmmAccessLib.c
>>> +++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/SmmAccess/Library/PeiSmm
>>> +++ A
>>> +++ cce
>>> +++ ssLib/PeiSmmAccessLib.c
>>> @@ -252,19 +252,7 @@ PeiInstallSmmAccessPpi (
>>>      EFI_SMRAM_HOB_DESCRIPTOR_BLOCK  *DescriptorBlock;
>>>      SMM_ACCESS_PRIVATE_DATA         *SmmAccessPrivate;
>>>      VOID                            *HobList;
>>> -  EFI_BOOT_MODE                   BootMode;
>>>
>>> -  Status = PeiServicesGetBootMode (&BootMode);
>>> -  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> -    //
>>> -    // If not in S3 boot path. do nothing
>>> -    //
>>> -    return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>> -  }
>>> -
>>> -  if (BootMode != BOOT_ON_S3_RESUME) {
>>> -    return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>> -  }
>>>      //
>>>      // Initialize private data
>>>      //
>>> --
>>> 2.28.0.windows.1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-18 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-09 13:39 [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg/PeiSmmAccessLib: Remove S3 requirement Michael Kubacki
2021-08-09 22:46 ` Chaganty, Rangasai V
2021-08-10  1:47   ` Ni, Ray
2021-08-10 15:36     ` [edk2-devel] " Michael Kubacki
2021-08-12  5:20       ` Ni, Ray
2021-08-18 18:46         ` Michael Kubacki
2021-08-18 21:15           ` Chaganty, Rangasai V [this message]
2021-08-19  0:13             ` Michael Kubacki
2021-08-19  2:01           ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-08-19 10:01             ` Ni, Ray
2021-08-19 14:27               ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-08-19 19:45                 ` Michael Kubacki
2021-08-20  8:11                   ` Ni, Ray
2021-08-20 17:32                     ` Michael Kubacki
2021-09-09 14:09                     ` Michael Kubacki
2021-09-09 14:51                       ` Ni, Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW3PR11MB4602130C44EB8967B31F3B44B6FF9@MW3PR11MB4602.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox