Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] Enhance Secure Boot Variable Libraries

["Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11343 bytes --]

Sounds great.

1) I assume that if it is accepted by project MU, then it must be reviewed and tested. Please add required tag in next patch set.

2) I suggest just use one of: a) all zero, b) initial data Jan/1/1970, c) current data.

With above change, reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>

Thank you
Yao, Jiewen


From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Kun Qin
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 2:07 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Xu, Min M <min.m.xu@intel.com>; Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>; Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>; Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>; Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>; Boeuf, Sebastien <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>; Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] Enhance Secure Boot Variable Libraries


Hi Jiewen,

Thanks for reading through these patches.

For #1, yes, we implemented these changes in project MU and validated them on both our virtual platform (https://github.com/microsoft/mu_tiano_platforms) and other proprietary hardware platforms. I will leave the acked-by or tested-by to others on the MU teams.

For #2, this is just an arbitrary timestamp from a previous date so that we can create time based payload without hard dependency on time protocol (which could result in potential executing sequence issue). I will update comment to avoid confusion in the next round of patch. But should you have other suggestions to improve this, please let me know.

Regards,
Kun
On 6/29/2022 1:50 AM, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
Hi Kun
Thank you to make the redesign.

Overall the patch set looks good to me. Some questions:


  1.  Is that from project MU? If so, I would like to see acked-by or tested-by from project MU owner. That can give me more confidence to accept it. 😊


  1.  Is below data from some document? If so, would please add URL? Also, why do we have to use this timestamp? What if a different timestamp is used?

+// MS Default Time-Based Payload Creation Date
+// This is the date that is used when creating SecureBoot default variables.
+// NOTE: This is a placeholder date that doesn't correspond to anything else.
+//
+EFI_TIME  mDefaultPayloadTimestamp = {
+  15,   // Year (2015)
+  8,    // Month (Aug)
+  28,   // Day (28)
+  0,    // Hour
+  0,    // Minute
+  0,    // Second
+  0,    // Pad1
+  0,    // Nanosecond
+  0,    // Timezone (Dummy value)
+  0,    // Daylight (Dummy value)
+  0     // Pad2
+};


From: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com><mailto:kuqin12@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 5:19 AM
To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io><mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; kuqin12@gmail.com<mailto:kuqin12@gmail.com>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com><mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com><mailto:jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Xu, Min M <min.m.xu@intel.com><mailto:min.m.xu@intel.com>; Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com><mailto:sean.brogan@microsoft.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org><mailto:ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>; Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen@intel.com><mailto:jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com><mailto:kraxel@redhat.com>; Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com><mailto:rebecca@bsdio.com>; Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org><mailto:grehan@freebsd.org>; Boeuf, Sebastien <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com><mailto:sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>; Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com><mailto:afish@apple.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com><mailto:ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] Enhance Secure Boot Variable Libraries

Hi SecurityPkg maintainers & reviewers,

I posted this patch series a while back intending to generalize the usage of a few interfaces from secure boot libraries. Could you please help reviewing them and provide feedback? Any input is appreciated.

Regards,
Kun

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 1:39 PM Kun Qin via groups.io<http://groups.io> <kuqin12=gmail.com@groups.io<mailto:gmail.com@groups.io>> wrote:
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3909
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3910
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3911

This is a revamp of a previously submitted patch series based on top of
master branch: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/89507. No changes
added.

Current SecureBootVariableLib provide great support for deleting secure
boot related variables, creating time-based payloads.

However, for secure boot enrollment, the SecureBootVariableProvisionLib
interfaces always assume the changes from variable storage, limiting the
usage, requiring existing platforms to change key initialization process
to adapt to the new methods, as well as bringing in extra dependencies
such as FV protocol, time protocols.

This patch series proposes to update the implementation for Secure Boot
Variable libraries and their consumers to better support the related
variables operations.

Patch v2 branch: https://github.com/kuqin12/edk2/tree/secure_boot_enhance_v2

Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com<mailto:jian.j.wang@intel.com>>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com<mailto:min.m.xu@intel.com>>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com<mailto:sean.brogan@microsoft.com>>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org<mailto:ardb%2Btianocore@kernel.org>>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com<mailto:jordan.l.justen@intel.com>>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com<mailto:kraxel@redhat.com>>
Cc: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com<mailto:rebecca@bsdio.com>>
Cc: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org<mailto:grehan@freebsd.org>>
Cc: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com<mailto:sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com<mailto:afish@apple.com>>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com<mailto:ray.ni@intel.com>>

Kun Qin (8):
  SecurityPkg: UefiSecureBoot: Definitions of cert and payload
    structures
  SecurityPkg: PlatformPKProtectionLib: Added PK protection interface
  SecurityPkg: SecureBootVariableLib: Updated time based payload creator
  SecurityPkg: SecureBootVariableProvisionLib: Updated implementation
  SecurityPkg: Secure Boot Drivers: Added common header files
  SecurityPkg: SecureBootConfigDxe: Updated invocation pattern
  OvmfPkg: Pipeline: Resolve SecureBootVariableLib dependency
  EmulatorPkg: Pipeline: Resolve SecureBootVariableLib dependency

kuqin (3):
  SecurityPkg: SecureBootVariableLib: Updated signature list creator
  SecurityPkg: SecureBootVariableLib: Added newly supported interfaces
  SecurityPkg: SecureBootVariableLib: Added unit tests

 SecurityPkg/EnrollFromDefaultKeysApp/EnrollFromDefaultKeysApp.c                           |    1 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/PlatformPKProtectionLibVarPolicy/PlatformPKProtectionLibVarPolicy.c   |   51 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/SecureBootVariableLib.c                         |  486 ++++-
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockPlatformPKProtectionLib.c          |   36 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockUefiLib.c                          |  201 ++
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockUefiRuntimeServicesTableLib.c      |   13 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/SecureBootVariableLibUnitTest.c        | 2037 ++++++++++++++++++++
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableProvisionLib/SecureBootVariableProvisionLib.c       |  145 +-
 SecurityPkg/VariableAuthenticated/SecureBootConfigDxe/SecureBootConfigImpl.c              |  128 +-
 SecurityPkg/VariableAuthenticated/SecureBootDefaultKeysDxe/SecureBootDefaultKeysDxe.c     |    1 +
 EmulatorPkg/EmulatorPkg.dsc                                                               |    1 +
 OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc                                                                |    1 +
 OvmfPkg/CloudHv/CloudHvX64.dsc                                                            |    1 +
 OvmfPkg/IntelTdx/IntelTdxX64.dsc                                                          |    1 +
 OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc                                                                   |    1 +
 OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc                                                                |    1 +
 OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc                                                                    |    1 +
 SecurityPkg/Include/Library/PlatformPKProtectionLib.h                                     |   31 +
 SecurityPkg/Include/Library/SecureBootVariableLib.h                                       |  103 +-
 SecurityPkg/Include/UefiSecureBoot.h                                                      |   94 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/PlatformPKProtectionLibVarPolicy/PlatformPKProtectionLibVarPolicy.inf |   36 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/SecureBootVariableLib.inf                       |   14 +-
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockPlatformPKProtectionLib.inf        |   33 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockUefiLib.inf                        |   45 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockUefiRuntimeServicesTableLib.inf    |   25 +
 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/SecureBootVariableLibUnitTest.inf      |   36 +
 SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.ci.yaml                                                           |   11 +
 SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dec                                                               |    5 +
 SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dsc                                                               |    2 +
 SecurityPkg/Test/SecurityPkgHostTest.dsc                                                  |   38 +
 SecurityPkg/VariableAuthenticated/SecureBootConfigDxe/SecureBootConfigDxe.inf             |    1 +
 31 files changed, 3468 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/PlatformPKProtectionLibVarPolicy/PlatformPKProtectionLibVarPolicy.c
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockPlatformPKProtectionLib.c
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockUefiLib.c
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockUefiRuntimeServicesTableLib.c
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/SecureBootVariableLibUnitTest.c
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Include/Library/PlatformPKProtectionLib.h
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Include/UefiSecureBoot.h
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/PlatformPKProtectionLibVarPolicy/PlatformPKProtectionLibVarPolicy.inf
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockPlatformPKProtectionLib.inf
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockUefiLib.inf
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/MockUefiRuntimeServicesTableLib.inf
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Library/SecureBootVariableLib/UnitTest/SecureBootVariableLibUnitTest.inf
 create mode 100644 SecurityPkg/Test/SecurityPkgHostTest.dsc

--
2.35.1.windows.2








[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 23246 bytes --]