public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>,
	Mikko Ylinen <mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: qinkun Bao <qinkun@google.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
	"Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	"Peter Gonda" <pgonda@google.com>,
	"Johnson, Simon P" <simon.p.johnson@intel.com>,
	"Xiang, Qinglan" <qinglan.xiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH] OvmfPkg/SecurityPkg: Add build option for coexistance of vTPM and RTMR.
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 01:20:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB5872BBA0D379C40E071300B98C052@MW4PR11MB5872.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAH4kHbqpaCgZJpF55x2NGWL22rz1ucRewYmR=K2chw2kP6sKA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Dionna/Qinkun
I am not sure if systemd is the last software in guest we need to patch to support coexistence to extend the measurement.
Are you aware of any other Linux guest software needs to be updated? Such as Linux IMA (Integrity Measurement Architecture)?

To move this forward.

In Intel, we had discussed and we did see the potential security risk. As I mentioned in the first email, "In case that any the guest component only knows one of vTPM or RTMR, and only extends one of vTPM or RTMR, but the other one only verifies the other, then the chain of trust is broken."

At same time, we also respect that it might be a valid use case for Google.
I would like to ask the opinion in the EDKII community, especially the OVMF and CC maintainer and reviewer.


Hi Ard Biesheuvel
Do you think Kernel is OK with this coexistence proposal?
Are you willing to give "reviewed-by"?

Hi Gerd Hoffman
Do you think RedHat is OK with this coexistence proposal?
Are you willing to give "reviewed-by"?

Hi James Bottomley
Do you think IBM is OK with this coexistence proposal?
Are you willing to give "reviewed-by"?

Hi Tom Lendacky/Michael Roth
Do you think AMD is OK with this coexistence proposal?
Are you willing to give "reviewed-by"?


Thank you
Yao, Jiewen


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 11:29 PM
> To: Mikko Ylinen <mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>;
> qinkun Bao <qinkun@google.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; linux-
> coco@lists.linux.dev; Aktas, Erdem <erdemaktas@google.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ardb@kernel.org>; Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>; James Bottomley
> <jejb@linux.ibm.com>; Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>; Michael
> Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] OvmfPkg/SecurityPkg: Add build option for coexistance
> of vTPM and RTMR.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 6:07 AM Mikko Ylinen
> <mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Looking at systemd-boot I see it will likewise not measure to both RTMR
> > > > and vTPM, but with reversed priority (use vTPM not RTMR in case both are
> > > > present).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Interesting. Thanks for this report. We'll push for the changed
> > > semantics here if the spec is indeed changed, and request partner
> > > distros in the CCC to include the updated systemd-boot.
> >
> > FWIW, my RTMRs patch to systemd was merged quite recently so it's not
> > included in any systemd release yet. (It was mainly implemented for the
> > UKI case that allows TDVF to boot a UKI image directly and then have the
> > image sections measured separately.)
> >
> 
> Thank you, I've proposed a change in
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/31939
> 
> 
> --
> -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#117606): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/117606
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105070442/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-11  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-21 16:59 [edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH] OvmfPkg/SecurityPkg: Add build option for coexistance of vTPM and RTMR qinkun Bao via groups.io
2024-03-21 17:46 ` Dionna Glaze via groups.io
2024-03-22  2:39   ` Yao, Jiewen
2024-03-22  8:52     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-03-22 14:56       ` Dionna Glaze via groups.io
2024-03-22 17:28         ` qinkun Bao via groups.io
2024-03-25 13:07         ` Mikko Ylinen
2024-03-25 15:28           ` Dionna Glaze via groups.io
2024-04-11  1:20             ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2024-04-11  6:23               ` qinkun Bao via groups.io
2024-04-11  6:52               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-04-11  8:07                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-04-11  9:56                   ` Yao, Jiewen
2024-04-11 10:29                     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-04-11 10:33                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-04-11 14:07                         ` Lendacky, Thomas via groups.io
2024-04-11 17:10                           ` Xiang, Qinglan
2024-04-13  9:36                 ` qinkun Bao via groups.io
2024-04-15 14:42                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found] ` <17C329C4A6D0CD18.8175@lists.confidentialcomputing.io>
     [not found]   ` <CAOjUGWcNedJ7iNjGCKL6qZeZo3aSt_8U5BN=9JUN2f2vjD+O4w@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <CA+2DEOoc1Ckn2S-=57HiRsAd0W4YGRWVQQG-gOBR3Fc8nfX+Nw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-04-09 19:16       ` [edk2-devel] [linux-collab] [CCC][tac] " qinkun Bao via groups.io

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB5872BBA0D379C40E071300B98C052@MW4PR11MB5872.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox