From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: Michael Kubacki <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "Gao, Liming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
"Kubacki, Michael" <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>,
Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>,
Rebecca Cran <quic_rcran@quicinc.com>,
Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>,
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
"Taylor Beebe" <t@taylorbeebe.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/3] MdeModulePkg: Enable forward edge CFI in mem attributes table
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 01:16:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB5872D501DDFAC1CC09A1F5B58CD79@MW4PR11MB5872.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc8e5851-448b-6d51-139b-6e67ab1b6ce5@linux.microsoft.com>
Hello
Can we assume that the entrypoint of PE/COFF image is always ENDBR64, if the PE/COFF image is enlightened to support IBT?
I believe the compiler should do that, because the loader need use indirect call to the PE/COFF entrypoint.
We need more code to detect *all* runtime images. The logic could be:
1) PE/COFF loader (X86, ARM) detects IBT capability for all runtime images, and report it.
2) DXE Core collects such info.
2.1) If ALL runtime image supports IBT, then gMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi = TRUE
2.2) Else, gMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi = FALSE.
The benefit is that it is more reliable to support binary PE image use case. Hard to use build time flag for external binary PE ...
Thank you
Yao, Jiewen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kubacki <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 8:24 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; ardb@kernel.org; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Cc: Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Yao, Jiewen
> <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Kubacki, Michael <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>;
> Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>; Rebecca Cran
> <quic_rcran@quicinc.com>; Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>; Sami
> Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>; Taylor Beebe <t@taylorbeebe.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/3] MdeModulePkg: Enable forward edge
> CFI in mem attributes table
>
> Ard, I am still actively tracking this for the PE/COFF spec.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have more firm info right now but I suggest
> holding off on alternatives for the time being and I will reply back as
> soon as the next steps are known.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> On 2/2/2023 2:00 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 19:49, Kinney, Michael D
> > <michael.d.kinney@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ard,
> >>
> >> Since the PE/COFF image does not contain this information, is there an
> option
> >> to add the information to an FFS file. Either as a new bit in a standard header
> >> or as a GUIDed section defined by EDK II?
> >>
> >> Since an FV may contain content build from source and additional content
> >> Integrated as binaries from other vendors, having a PCD that scopes this
> >> attribute to all FVs many only work for FW builds that are 100% from sources.
> >>
> >
> > I didn't quite consider that scenario tbh.
> >
> > It would be nice if we could avoid another PI spec dance for this, and
> > get some kind of IBT/BTI annotation added to the PE/COFF spec. That
> > way, we cover this issue, as well as clear the way for the use if
> > IBT/BTI when running under the firmware.
> >
> > Are TE images a concern here as well? I.e., are those likely to be
> > used for runtime DXE images in firmware volumes?
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 10:04 AM
> >>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> >>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Yao,
> >>> Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Kubacki, Michael
> <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>; Sean Brogan
> <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>; Rebecca
> >>> Cran <quic_rcran@quicinc.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>; Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>;
> Taylor Beebe
> >>> <t@taylorbeebe.com>
> >>> Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] MdeModulePkg: Enable forward edge CFI in mem
> attributes table
> >>>
> >>> The memory attributes table has been extended with a flag that indicates
> >>> whether or not the OS is permitted to map the EFI runtime code regions
> >>> with strict enforcement for IBT/BTI landing pad instructions.
> >>>
> >>> This is generally a property of the firmware build, and so we can permit
> >>> a platform to set this property using a PCD, and put the burden on the
> >>> platform definition to set the toolchain options accordingly.
> >>>
> >>> There is one snag, however: PE/COFF does not expose whether or not the
> >>> code was generated with landing pads, so if any runtime DXE drivers were
> >>> loaded from storage other than the firmware volumes, we must assume
> that
> >>> setting the CFI flag in the memory attributes table is unsafe.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.h | 2 ++
> >>> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.inf | 1 +
> >>> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Image/Image.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >>> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryAttributesTable.c | 7 ++++++-
> >>> MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec | 8 ++++++++
> >>> 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.h
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.h
> >>> index 815a6b4bd844..427a5fc78f72 100644
> >>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.h
> >>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.h
> >>> @@ -280,6 +280,8 @@ extern EFI_MEMORY_TYPE_INFORMATION
> gMemoryTypeInformation[EfiMaxMemoryType + 1]
> >>> extern BOOLEAN gDispatcherRunning;
> >>>
> >>> extern EFI_RUNTIME_ARCH_PROTOCOL gRuntimeTemplate;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> +extern BOOLEAN gMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi;
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>>
> >>> extern EFI_LOAD_FIXED_ADDRESS_CONFIGURATION_TABLE
> gLoadModuleAtFixAddressConfigurationTable;
> >>>
> >>> extern BOOLEAN
> gLoadFixedAddressCodeMemoryReady;
> >>>
> >>> //
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.inf
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.inf
> >>> index 35d5bf0dee6f..e6ff67773a69 100644
> >>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.inf
> >>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.inf
> >>> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ [Pcd]
> >>> gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdHeapGuardPropertyMask
> ## CONSUMES
> >>>
> >>> gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuStackGuard ##
> CONSUMES
> >>>
> >>>
> gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFwVolDxeMaxEncapsulationDepth
> ## CONSUMES
> >>>
> >>> +
> gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi
> ## CONSUMES
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> # [Hob]
> >>>
> >>> # RESOURCE_DESCRIPTOR ## CONSUMES
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Image/Image.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Image/Image.c
> >>> index 06cc6744b8c6..181fefdb6657 100644
> >>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Image/Image.c
> >>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Image/Image.c
> >>> @@ -1398,6 +1398,17 @@ CoreLoadImageCommon (
> >>> CoreNewDebugImageInfoEntry
> (EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_TYPE_NORMAL, &Image->Info, Image->Handle);
> >>>
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> + //
> >>>
> >>> + // If we loaded a runtime DXE driver from something other than a FV, it
> >>>
> >>> + // was not built as part of the firmware image, and so we cannot assume
> >>>
> >>> + // that it was built with IBT/BTI landing pads for forward edge control
> >>>
> >>> + // flow integrity.
> >>>
> >>> + //
> >>>
> >>> + if (!ImageIsFromFv &&
> >>>
> >>> + (Image->ImageContext.ImageCodeMemoryType ==
> EfiRuntimeServicesCode)) {
> >>>
> >>> + gMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi = FALSE;
> >>>
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>>
> >>> //
> >>>
> >>> // Reinstall loaded image protocol to fire any notifications
> >>>
> >>> //
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryAttributesTable.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryAttributesTable.c
> >>> index e07921371187..cdd35ade0a8a 100644
> >>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryAttributesTable.c
> >>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryAttributesTable.c
> >>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ BOOLEAN mMemoryAttributesTableEnable
> = TRUE;
> >>> BOOLEAN mMemoryAttributesTableEndOfDxe = FALSE;
> >>>
> >>> EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE *mMemoryAttributesTable =
> NULL;
> >>>
> >>> BOOLEAN mMemoryAttributesTableReadyToBoot = FALSE;
> >>>
> >>> +BOOLEAN gMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi =
> FixedPcdGetBool (PcdMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi);
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>>
> >>> Install MemoryAttributesTable.
> >>>
> >>> @@ -182,7 +183,11 @@ InstallMemoryAttributesTable (
> >>> MemoryAttributesTable->Version =
> EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE_VERSION;
> >>>
> >>> MemoryAttributesTable->NumberOfEntries = RuntimeEntryCount;
> >>>
> >>> MemoryAttributesTable->DescriptorSize = (UINT32)DescriptorSize;
> >>>
> >>> - MemoryAttributesTable->Reserved = 0;
> >>>
> >>> + if (gMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi) {
> >>>
> >>> + MemoryAttributesTable->Flags =
> EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_FLAGS_RT_FORWARD_CONTROL_FLOW_GUARD;
> >>>
> >>> + } else {
> >>>
> >>> + MemoryAttributesTable->Flags = 0;
> >>>
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, "MemoryAttributesTable:\n"));
> >>>
> >>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, " Version - 0x%08x\n",
> MemoryAttributesTable->Version));
> >>>
> >>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, " NumberOfEntries - 0x%08x\n",
> MemoryAttributesTable->NumberOfEntries));
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> >>> index 9605c617b7a8..d336a38655a3 100644
> >>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> >>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> >>> @@ -1093,6 +1093,14 @@ [PcdsFixedAtBuild]
> >>> # @Prompt Enable UEFI Stack Guard.
> >>>
> >>>
> gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuStackGuard|FALSE|BOOLEAN|0x30
> 001055
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> + ## Indicates whether the EFI memory attributes table will inform the OS
> that
> >>>
> >>> + # forward edge control flow guards have been inserted into the runtime
> services
> >>>
> >>> + # code regions.
> >>>
> >>> + # TRUE - Runtime code has forward control flow guards.<BR>
> >>>
> >>> + # FALSE - Runtime code does not have forward control flow guards.<BR>
> >>>
> >>> + # @Prompt Enable forward control flow guards in EFI memory attributes
> table
> >>>
> >>> +
> gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdMemoryAttributesTableForwardCfi|FAL
> SE|BOOLEAN|0x30001056
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>>
> >>> [PcdsFixedAtBuild, PcdsPatchableInModule]
> >>>
> >>> ## Dynamic type PCD can be registered callback function for Pcd setting
> action.
> >>>
> >>> # PcdMaxPeiPcdCallBackNumberPerPcdEntry indicates the maximum
> number of callback function
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.39.1
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-02 18:03 [RFC PATCH 0/3] enable IBT/BTI codegen and reporting to the OS Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-02 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] MdePkg: Update MemoryAttributesTable to v2.10 Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-02 18:44 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael D Kinney
2023-02-03 0:26 ` Michael Kubacki
2023-02-02 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] MdeModulePkg: Enable forward edge CFI in mem attributes table Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-02 18:48 ` Michael D Kinney
2023-02-02 19:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-03 0:24 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael Kubacki
2023-02-03 1:16 ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2023-02-03 8:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-03 9:52 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-02-03 10:10 ` Yao, Jiewen
2023-03-24 21:48 ` Michael Kubacki
2023-02-03 8:25 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-02-03 8:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-03 8:34 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-02-02 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtQemu: Implement BTI for runtime regions Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB5872D501DDFAC1CC09A1F5B58CD79@MW4PR11MB5872.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox