From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: Jan Bobek <jbobek@nvidia.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Jan Bobek <jbobek@nvidia.com>,
"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"Xu, Min M" <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] SecurityPkg/AuthVariableLib: Check SHA-256 OID with ContentInfo present
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 02:37:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB5872F78DD70120411776F6DC8CC89@MW4PR11MB5872.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230122215348.47191-1-jbobek@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5077 bytes --]
reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
________________________________
发件人: Jan Bobek <jbobek@nvidia.com>
发送时间: Monday, January 23, 2023 5:53:48 AM
收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
抄送: Jan Bobek <jbobek@nvidia.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Xu, Min M <min.m.xu@intel.com>
主题: [PATCH v2 1/1] SecurityPkg/AuthVariableLib: Check SHA-256 OID with ContentInfo present
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4305
Based on whether the DER-encoded ContentInfo structure is present in
authenticated SetVariable payload or not, the SHA-256 OID can be
located at different places.
UEFI specification explicitly states the driver shall support both
cases, but the old code assumed ContentInfo was not present and
incorrectly rejected authenticated variable updates when it were
present.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Bobek <jbobek@nvidia.com>
---
.../Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c b/SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c
index 054ee4d1d988..9beeca09aeba 100644
--- a/SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c
+++ b/SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c
@@ -1925,7 +1925,7 @@ VerifyTimeBasedPayload (
// SignedData.digestAlgorithms shall contain the digest algorithm used when preparing the
// signature. Only a digest algorithm of SHA-256 is accepted.
//
- // According to PKCS#7 Definition:
+ // According to PKCS#7 Definition (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2315):
// SignedData ::= SEQUENCE {
// version Version,
// digestAlgorithms DigestAlgorithmIdentifiers,
@@ -1933,15 +1933,49 @@ VerifyTimeBasedPayload (
// .... }
// The DigestAlgorithmIdentifiers can be used to determine the hash algorithm
// in VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATION_2 descriptor.
- // This field has the fixed offset (+13) and be calculated based on two bytes of length encoding.
+ // This field has the fixed offset (+13) or (+32) based on whether the DER-encoded
+ // ContentInfo structure is present or not, and can be calculated based on two
+ // bytes of length encoding.
+ //
+ // Both condition can be handled in WrapPkcs7Data() in CryptPkcs7VerifyCommon.c.
+ //
+ // See below examples:
+ //
+ // 1. Without ContentInfo
+ // 30 82 0c da // SEQUENCE (5 element) (3294 BYTES) -- SignedData
+ // 02 01 01 // INTEGER 1 -- Version
+ // 31 0f // SET (1 element) (15 BYTES) -- DigestAlgorithmIdentifiers
+ // 30 0d // SEQUENCE (2 element) (13 BYTES) -- AlgorithmIdentifier
+ // 06 09 // OBJECT-IDENTIFIER (9 BYTES) -- algorithm
+ // 60 86 48 01 65 03 04 02 01 // sha256 [2.16.840.1.101.3.4.2.1]
+ // 05 00 // NULL (0 BYTES) -- parameters
+ //
+ // Example from: https://uefi.org/revocationlistfile
+ //
+ // 2. With ContentInfo
+ // 30 82 05 90 // SEQUENCE (1424 BYTES) -- ContentInfo
+ // 06 09 // OBJECT-IDENTIFIER (9 BYTES) -- ContentType
+ // 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 07 02 // signedData [1.2.840.113549.1.7.2]
+ // a0 82 05 81 // CONTEXT-SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTED TAG 0 (1409 BYTES) -- content
+ // 30 82 05 7d // SEQUENCE (1405 BYTES) -- SignedData
+ // 02 01 01 // INTEGER 1 -- Version
+ // 31 0f // SET (1 element) (15 BYTES) -- DigestAlgorithmIdentifiers
+ // 30 0d // SEQUENCE (13 BYTES) -- AlgorithmIdentifier
+ // 06 09 // OBJECT-IDENTIFIER (9 BYTES) -- algorithm
+ // 60 86 48 01 65 03 04 02 01 // sha256 [2.16.840.1.101.3.4.2.1]
+ // 05 00 // NULL (0 BYTES) -- parameters
+ //
+ // Example generated with: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface/Secure_Boot#Manual_process
//
if ((Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_TIME_BASED_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS) != 0) {
- if (SigDataSize >= (13 + sizeof (mSha256OidValue))) {
- if (((*(SigData + 1) & TWO_BYTE_ENCODE) != TWO_BYTE_ENCODE) ||
- (CompareMem (SigData + 13, &mSha256OidValue, sizeof (mSha256OidValue)) != 0))
- {
- return EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION;
- }
+ if ( ( (SigDataSize >= (13 + sizeof (mSha256OidValue)))
+ && ( ((*(SigData + 1) & TWO_BYTE_ENCODE) != TWO_BYTE_ENCODE)
+ || (CompareMem (SigData + 13, &mSha256OidValue, sizeof (mSha256OidValue)) != 0)))
+ && ( (SigDataSize >= (32 + sizeof (mSha256OidValue)))
+ && ( ((*(SigData + 20) & TWO_BYTE_ENCODE) != TWO_BYTE_ENCODE)
+ || (CompareMem (SigData + 32, &mSha256OidValue, sizeof (mSha256OidValue)) != 0))))
+ {
+ return EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION;
}
}
--
2.30.2
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8587 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-23 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-22 21:53 [PATCH v2 1/1] SecurityPkg/AuthVariableLib: Check SHA-256 OID with ContentInfo present Jan Bobek
2023-01-23 2:37 ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2023-01-23 6:06 ` Yao, Jiewen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB5872F78DD70120411776F6DC8CC89@MW4PR11MB5872.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox