Hi Ray,

I was suggested not to rename the file for review easiness and git history concern during v2 patch. Thread here: Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] UefiCpuPkg: CpuIo2Smm: Support of CpuIo driver under StandaloneMm (groups.io)<https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/69857>

Please let me know if you still recommend renaming the files. If so, would you suggest ```CpuIo2Smm.c/h --> CpuIo2Mm.c/h  # remove the "S"``` to be a separate patch between gSmst change and adding Standalone MM instance?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Kun

From: Ni, Ray<mailto:ray.ni@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 20:17
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; kun.q@outlook.com<mailto:kun.q@outlook.com>
Cc: Dong, Eric<mailto:eric.dong@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek<mailto:lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul1<mailto:rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 17/18] UefiCpuPkg: CpuIo2Smm: Support of CpuIo driver under StandaloneMm

>
>  UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2Smm.c                               |  9 ++----
>  UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2StandaloneMm.c                      | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2TraditionalMm.c                     | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2Smm.h                               | 12 ++++++++
>  UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2Smm.inf                             |  3 +-
>  UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/{CpuIo2Smm.inf => CpuIo2StandaloneMm.inf} | 18 +++++------
>  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dsc                                      |  5 +++


How about do the file name change as below?
CpuIo2Smm.c/h --> CpuIo2Mm.c/h  # remove the "S"
CpuIo2TraditionalMm.c -> CpuIo2Smm.c # Traditional MM equals to SMM. It also matches to CpuIo2Smm.inf.
CpuIo2StandaloneMm.c/inf # looks good to me.