public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kubacki" <michael.kubacki@outlook.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, ray.ni@intel.com
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] MdePkg: Correct EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION3 value
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:54:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR07MB34407FC39143E02EF2159B91E93F0@MWHPR07MB3440.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4007E1C79E5E84F4BB4D84CA8C3F0@BY5PR11MB4007.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Ray,

Rev3 adds the UINT32 field OptimalTransferLengthGranularity field to 
EFI_BLOCK_IO_MEDIA. A preexisting binary Block I/O producer that uses 
this field will set their revision to the higher value and the only 
check I see in edk2 (PartitionDxe) on the revision to access this field 
checks for >= EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION3.

If a binary Block I/O producer is built with the new value that is 
consumed by a module built with the older value it might ignore the 
OptimalTransferLengthGranularity field. I do not see where this is the 
case in edk2 other than PartitionDxe which sets the 
OptimalTransferLengthGranularity field to zero for Rev3.

You have contributed to this code in the past so feel free to provide 
any further insight if needed.

That said, this change was made to fix a bug in the edk2 implementation 
to remove a conflict with the UEFI Spec, the two should be in agreement.

I suggest the change be added to the next stable tag release notes so 
authors of such modules are made aware they should release an update 
with the new revision value.

Thanks,
Michael

On 9/17/2020 6:25 PM, Ni, Ray wrote:
> Mike,
> Have you evaluated the impact to the already-released module that relies on the macro value?
> 
> Basically, you changed to a smaller value that may cause a revision3 check fail:
> a released module expects the revision is bigger than 0x31, but the value is 0x1f.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ray
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Michael Kubacki
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 2:11 AM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang
>> <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
>> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] MdePkg: Correct EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION3 value
>>
>> From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>>
>> REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2961
>>
>> The value of EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION3 is currently
>> 0x00020031. However, the value assigned in the UEFI Specification
>> 2.8B is ((2<<16) | (31)) which is 0x0002001F.
>>
>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
>> Cc: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>> ---
>>   MdePkg/Include/Protocol/BlockIo.h | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/BlockIo.h b/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/BlockIo.h
>> index 7b332691ede3..3bd76885e11c 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/BlockIo.h
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/BlockIo.h
>> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ typedef struct {
>>
>>   #define EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION  0x00010000
>>   #define EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION2 0x00020001
>> -#define EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION3 0x00020031
>> +#define EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION3 0x0002001F
>>
>>   ///
>>   /// Revision defined in EFI1.1.
>> --
>> 2.28.0.windows.1
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-18 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14 18:11 [PATCH v1 1/1] MdePkg: Correct EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION3 value Michael Kubacki
2020-09-15  0:54 ` 回复: [edk2-devel] " gaoliming
2020-09-17 16:49   ` Michael Kubacki
2020-09-18  1:08     ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-09-15  3:27 ` Zhiguang Liu
2020-09-18  1:25 ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2020-09-18 18:54   ` Michael Kubacki [this message]
2020-09-18 23:53     ` Ni, Ray
2020-09-19  0:26       ` Michael Kubacki
2020-09-21  2:28         ` Ni, Ray
2020-09-21 20:00           ` Michael Kubacki
2020-09-22  1:22             ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-09-22 21:34               ` Michael D Kinney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR07MB34407FC39143E02EF2159B91E93F0@MWHPR07MB3440.namprd07.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox