public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kubacki" <michael.kubacki@outlook.com>
To: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe: Improve function parameter validation
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:42:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR07MB344088D5813702AED6402AF8E94B0@MWHPR07MB3440.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4461C03786C3092EF71BFE6CD24B0@MN2PR11MB4461.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Mike,

Some of those functions currently return EFI_SUCCESS if ImageIndex is 
invalid. Example: 
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.c#L851

Given the request to update the EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER text for those 
other functions, I'm assuming you'd like me to make those return 
EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER like what GetTheImage() currently does - 
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.c#L573?

Thanks,
Michael

On 8/5/2020 9:51 AM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> A few minor comments included below.  With those updates,
> 
> Reviewed-bv: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> 
> Mike
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: michael.kubacki@outlook.com <michael.kubacki@outlook.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 8:15 PM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>> Cc: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v1 7/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe: Improve function parameter validation
>>
>> From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>>
>> REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2869
>>
>> Makes some minor improvements to function parameter validation
>> in FmpDxe, in particular to externally exposed functions such
>> as those that back EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_PROTOCOL.
>>
>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>> ---
>>   FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++---
>>   FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.h | 10 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.c b/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.c
>> index a3e342591936..958d9b394b71 100644
>> --- a/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.c
>> +++ b/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.c
>> @@ -278,6 +278,11 @@ PopulateDescriptor (
>>     EFI_STATUS  Status;
>>     UINT32      DependenciesSize;
>>
>> +  if (Private == NULL) {
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "FmpDxe(%s): PopulateDescriptor() - Private is NULL.\n", mImageIdName));
>> +    return;
>> +  }
>> +
>>     if (Private->DescriptorPopulated) {
>>       return;
>>     }
>> @@ -429,7 +434,7 @@ PopulateDescriptor (
>>     @retval EFI_SUCCESS                The device was successfully updated with the new image.
>>     @retval EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL       The ImageInfo buffer was too small. The current buffer size
>>                                        needed to hold the image(s) information is returned in ImageInfoSize.
>> -  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER      ImageInfoSize is NULL.
>> +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER      A required pointer is NULL.
>>     @retval EFI_DEVICE_ERROR           Valid information could not be returned. Possible corrupted image.
>>
>>   **/
>> @@ -451,6 +456,12 @@ GetTheImageInfo (
>>
>>     Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>>
>> +  if (This == NULL) {
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "FmpDxe(%s): GetImageInfo() - This is NULL.\n", mImageIdName));
>> +    Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> +    goto cleanup;
>> +  }
>> +
>>     //
>>     // Retrieve the private context structure
>>     //
>> @@ -536,7 +547,7 @@ GetTheImageInfo (
>>     @retval EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL   The buffer specified by ImageSize is too small to hold the
>>                                    image. The current buffer size needed to hold the image is returned
>>                                    in ImageSize.
>> -  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  The Image was NULL.
>> +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL or ImageIndex is invalid.
>>     @retval EFI_NOT_FOUND          The current image is not copied to the buffer.
>>     @retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED        The operation is not supported.
>>     @retval EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION The operation could not be performed due to an authentication failure.
>> @@ -561,6 +572,12 @@ GetTheImage (
>>
>>     Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>>
>> +  if (This == NULL) {
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "FmpDxe(%s): GetImage() - This is NULL.\n", mImageIdName));
>> +    Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> +    goto cleanup;
>> +  }
>> +
>>     //
>>     // Retrieve the private context structure
>>     //
>> @@ -615,7 +632,8 @@ GetTheImage (
>>     @param[in]   Image                 Pointer to the image.
>>     @param[in]   ImageSize             Size of the image.
>>     @param[in]   AdditionalHeaderSize  Size of any headers that cannot be calculated by this function.
>> -  @param[out]  PayloadSize
>> +  @param[out]  PayloadSize           An optional pointer to a UINTN that holds the size of the payload
>> +                                     (image size minus headers)
>>
>>     @retval  !NULL  Valid pointer to the header.
>>     @retval  NULL   Structure is bad and pointer cannot be found.
>> @@ -626,7 +644,7 @@ GetFmpHeader (
>>     IN  CONST EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_AUTHENTICATION  *Image,
>>     IN  CONST UINTN                              ImageSize,
>>     IN  CONST UINTN                              AdditionalHeaderSize,
>> -  OUT UINTN                                    *PayloadSize
>> +  OUT UINTN                                    *PayloadSize OPTIONAL
>>     )
>>   {
>>     //
>> @@ -640,7 +658,10 @@ GetFmpHeader (
>>       return NULL;
>>     }
>>
>> -  *PayloadSize = ImageSize - (sizeof (Image->MonotonicCount) + Image->AuthInfo.Hdr.dwLength + AdditionalHeaderSize);
>> +  if (PayloadSize != NULL) {
>> +    *PayloadSize = ImageSize - (sizeof (Image->MonotonicCount) + Image->AuthInfo.Hdr.dwLength + AdditionalHeaderSize);
>> +  }
>> +
>>     return (VOID *)((UINT8 *)Image + sizeof (Image->MonotonicCount) + Image->AuthInfo.Hdr.dwLength  + AdditionalHeaderSize);
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -663,6 +684,10 @@ GetAllHeaderSize (
>>   {
>>     UINT32  CalculatedSize;
>>
>> +  if (Image == NULL) {
> 
> This is an internal helper function.  If Image is ever NULL, it must be a bug in the
> FmpDxe driver.  Should we do more than just return 0?  Perhaps a DEBUG_ERROR message too?
> 
>> +    return 0;
>> +  }
>> +
>>     CalculatedSize = sizeof (Image->MonotonicCount) +
>>                      AdditionalHeaderSize +
>>                      Image->AuthInfo.Hdr.dwLength;
>> @@ -698,7 +723,7 @@ GetAllHeaderSize (
>>
>>     @retval EFI_SUCCESS            The image was successfully checked.
>>     @retval EFI_ABORTED            The operation is aborted.
>> -  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  The Image was NULL.
>> +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL.
> 
> This function also uses ImageIndex.  Similar to updates above, I think this
> @retval line should be:
> 
>    @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL or ImageIndex is invalid.
> 
>>     @retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED        The operation is not supported.
>>     @retval EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION The operation could not be performed due to an authentication failure.
>>
>> @@ -743,6 +768,12 @@ CheckTheImage (
>>       return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>>     }
>>
>> +  if (This == NULL) {
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "FmpDxe(%s): CheckImage() - This is NULL.\n", mImageIdName));
>> +    Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> +    goto cleanup;
>> +  }
>> +
>>     //
>>     // Retrieve the private context structure
>>     //
>> @@ -978,7 +1009,7 @@ CheckTheImage (
>>
>>     @retval EFI_SUCCESS            The device was successfully updated with the new image.
>>     @retval EFI_ABORTED            The operation is aborted.
>> -  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  The Image was NULL.
>> +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL.
> 
> This function also uses ImageIndex.  Similar to updates above, I think this
> @retval line should be:
> 
>    @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL or ImageIndex is invalid.
> 
>>     @retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED        The operation is not supported.
>>     @retval EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION The operation could not be performed due to an authentication failure.
>>
>> @@ -1026,6 +1057,12 @@ SetTheImage (
>>       return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>>     }
>>
>> +  if (This == NULL) {
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "FmpDxe(%s): SetTheImage() - This is NULL.\n", mImageIdName));
>> +    Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> +    goto cleanup;
>> +  }
>> +
>>     //
>>     // Retrieve the private context structure
>>     //
>> @@ -1382,6 +1419,11 @@ FmpDxeLockEventNotify (
>>     EFI_STATUS                        Status;
>>     FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_PRIVATE_DATA  *Private;
>>
>> +  if (Context == NULL) {
>> +    ASSERT (Context != NULL);
>> +    return;
>> +  }
>> +
>>     Private = (FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_PRIVATE_DATA *)Context;
>>
>>     if (!Private->FmpDeviceLocked) {
>> diff --git a/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.h b/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.h
>> index 30754dea495e..4dfec316a558 100644
>> --- a/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.h
>> +++ b/FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.h
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>     image stored in a firmware device with platform and firmware device specific
>>     information provided through PCDs and libraries.
>>
>> -  Copyright (c) 2016, Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
>> +  Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.<BR>
>>     Copyright (c) 2018 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
>>
>>     SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ DetectTestKey (
>>     @retval EFI_SUCCESS                The device was successfully updated with the new image.
>>     @retval EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL       The ImageInfo buffer was too small. The current buffer size
>>                                        needed to hold the image(s) information is returned in ImageInfoSize.
>> -  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER      ImageInfoSize is NULL.
>> +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER      A required pointer is NULL.
>>     @retval EFI_DEVICE_ERROR           Valid information could not be returned. Possible corrupted image.
>>
>>   **/
>> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ GetTheImageInfo (
>>     @retval EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL   The buffer specified by ImageSize is too small to hold the
>>                                    image. The current buffer size needed to hold the image is returned
>>                                    in ImageSize.
>> -  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  The Image was NULL.
>> +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL or ImageIndex is invalid.
>>     @retval EFI_NOT_FOUND          The current image is not copied to the buffer.
>>     @retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED        The operation is not supported.
>>     @retval EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION The operation could not be performed due to an authentication failure.
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ GetTheImage (
>>
>>     @retval EFI_SUCCESS            The image was successfully checked.
>>     @retval EFI_ABORTED            The operation is aborted.
>> -  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  The Image was NULL.
>> +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL.
> 
> This function also uses ImageIndex.  Similar to updates above, I think this
> @retval line should be:
> 
>    @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL or ImageIndex is invalid.
> 
>>     @retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED        The operation is not supported.
>>     @retval EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION The operation could not be performed due to an authentication failure.
>>
>> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ CheckTheImage (
>>
>>     @retval EFI_SUCCESS            The device was successfully updated with the new image.
>>     @retval EFI_ABORTED            The operation is aborted.
>> -  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  The Image was NULL.
>> +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL.
> 
> This function also uses ImageIndex.  Similar to updates above, I think this
> @retval line should be:
> 
>    @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER  A required pointer is NULL or ImageIndex is invalid.
> 
>>     @retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED        The operation is not supported.
>>     @retval EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION The operation could not be performed due to an authentication failure.
>>
>> --
>> 2.27.0.windows.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-05 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200731031448.1103-1-michael.kubacki@outlook.com>
2020-07-31  3:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDependencyLib: Correct ValidateDependency() documentation Michael Kubacki
2020-08-05 16:19   ` Michael D Kinney
2020-07-31  3:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDependencyLib: Fix "exression" typo Michael Kubacki
2020-08-05 16:08   ` Michael D Kinney
2020-07-31  3:14 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDependencyLib: Handle version string overflow Michael Kubacki
2020-08-05 16:13   ` Michael D Kinney
2020-07-31  3:14 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDependencyCheckLib: Return unsatisfied on handle failure Michael Kubacki
2020-08-05 16:16   ` Michael D Kinney
2020-07-31  3:14 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe: Better warn of potential ImageTypeId misconfig Michael Kubacki
2020-08-05 16:17   ` Michael D Kinney
2020-07-31  3:14 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe: Indicate ESRT GUID on invalid ImageIdName Michael Kubacki
2020-08-05 16:17   ` [edk2-devel] " Michael D Kinney
2020-07-31  3:14 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe: Improve function parameter validation Michael Kubacki
2020-08-05 16:51   ` Michael D Kinney
2020-08-05 20:42     ` Michael Kubacki [this message]
2020-08-05 23:30       ` Michael D Kinney
2020-08-06  0:30         ` [edk2-devel] " Michael Kubacki
2020-08-06 16:06           ` Michael D Kinney
2020-08-06 18:22             ` Michael Kubacki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR07MB344088D5813702AED6402AF8E94B0@MWHPR07MB3440.namprd07.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox