From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.105.1605309508863710307 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:18:29 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector2-intel-onmicrosoft-com header.b=Ih7syDuq; spf=pass (domain: intel.com, ip: 134.134.136.126, mailfrom: nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com) IronPort-SDR: AXifzzqV8bJORwbrV31x27dEqauxOeKHDeIiNKYy3TsU1ikT7Q+Qe0k/H/wD1gfqm6omnMyuzP fAaChwZKLAmg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9804"; a="158322533" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,476,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="158322533" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2020 15:18:20 -0800 IronPort-SDR: eWV0Zx8IwSLZ1kOEYb59WFaMuqI9Aw0lvulBNQ3eJC8XeTK82GxLh+3NJ4R42GIismNeAOeIGM 9YxWmcTa+STg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,476,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="355698201" Received: from fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.86]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2020 15:18:19 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.86) by fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:18:18 -0800 Received: from fmsedg602.ED.cps.intel.com (10.1.192.136) by fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:18:18 -0800 Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.66.46) by edgegateway.intel.com (192.55.55.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:17:35 -0800 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kIU5qSppdhbfb5f7ipmKK78165uByLu6FyiG0XKcv0HWDv+DI2s+H2p07IBIWh5EojZOuy8XS4WRrzAt7pbMRGk7LreaZXhTcurwzUtmq3QFHT+olmtpmc6hGCM2MHZF3Y2ST1ktDfN8z0IVXoWNObVZ+AS8gcpRJnkrde4wGKCJLBt3qB2vo+EijfLWa/j5ppZM9Sciz8QX6/ULA8vFNMuCRE/ij7szCJJxDuNmcFsn6dLqIOZvnKSoW8FZGag1o4AQvutcDlB0yD8qRFrX6bM/V4GM3A5PuASA/iPcMd7+fn/xzXnwnR6Gs2w9n/yJXFpjH1FxhfJnS3lw+p8+pQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nNndCregAu4hpPRm0w1wG67xdCt9mskV+viuxn66FKQ=; b=HuHbzGVgdhKlg+swmSm7Lj8MyXQ5wlLbVf8X/lGFOP5Q+ntm2Bho0/4vmVVxJDfVAoPIQ4xOBuISYJKfKIcCqjtXXisLUUphk2mQbtxJXW/VC2LqW52hc2B+QfqijhtpDxA1dFjgjTAGzKAIegcndvbTSQTYomYpRJlGfIoH/knVXdnP/q/zTAZ7cQN8/VESv2nnRbKflXTpZore/xIM/Pv3p2TXyVC6KiVDKfVF3wSvMoRx1jAMY5cOAwqFpIjtjvyGWZ/zrK2q58G3NlG5Wm7XkNVRAeTOrq1whQwz2qoVbqCRKT1swFsOfipAFeC9YD9BleASgG3++Zc60qd3WQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-intel-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nNndCregAu4hpPRm0w1wG67xdCt9mskV+viuxn66FKQ=; b=Ih7syDuqBe7fiNXM5J5J4GCP6YK6uekOPGgbARTROyPk7p7Zi7E70PydUJPGgtZGLK6IuJ7+jXsuoC7cYT3q+noeeq1sLnJ2hFmRRzsWslMM3jwD6BnzYiw+t9c7HtyYWRvnC3DqVir5liRm8/3huvaNOqR60YoYofv4zMwbkoM= Received: from MWHPR1101MB2160.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.174.101.140) by MW3PR11MB4668.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.181.53.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3541.21; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 23:17:34 +0000 Received: from MWHPR1101MB2160.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3161:c00f:c5c5:f710]) by MWHPR1101MB2160.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3161:c00f:c5c5:f710%8]) with mapi id 15.20.3541.026; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 23:17:34 +0000 From: "Nate DeSimone" To: "Bjorge, Erik C" , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , "rfc@edk2.groups.io" CC: "Desimone, Ashley E" Subject: Re: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo Thread-Topic: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo Thread-Index: AdaXcXoW2KjI1OFyTGOGyDlWdmArhwABwm0gAAHkY3AIpEaLEA== Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 23:17:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows authentication-results: intel.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;intel.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=intel.com; x-originating-ip: [50.53.190.176] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a4da1702-b6f6-4285-099c-08d8882a4d8b x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MW3PR11MB4668: x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AnV9peXHJrXCTpz5GvUgDsjNeB7Oy9QZqEN8PbxIY6Vwha6UtMK1WdMJOVgjkaJFwzusiXiNQCDrCekSFlufcto92bZa5vbs/viqRbLdMFQ1vnSvZxxRT/5TK6KGVuomtb0dgBpRaOdiXcCVDSkh9G5+G9aJ9hZSHRJvnT3Z5DpgW2rMPz51fF+JN4fb+NkKmrUBH5DYGUK6ew4MFRGg1Lc2QvJauz2dUEp5TuusAQ2lUWzsZOxtQpMjyf8om5DcXCWZyVZPetVI2h9lMQaXkA2WQ5JVfwAoAMk50KcoNDf3nVf5ww12nQi3ldIAM5hMsVoGHFyg6lwIqoBZu2fJvw== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:MWHPR1101MB2160.namprd11.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(110136005)(7696005)(64756008)(66476007)(450100002)(52536014)(26005)(186003)(5660300002)(8936002)(107886003)(2906002)(83380400001)(71200400001)(4326008)(316002)(55016002)(66556008)(66446008)(86362001)(478600001)(6506007)(8676002)(66946007)(76116006)(53546011)(33656002)(9686003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Rc9rJJtsx+4XH3FRRLHaU1Gsm1W1OpPDPvCe1OX8y17uKGsawyOXk+cLfLOHkTa3vxWRe86BFjYVjjRV5gGs46JpzRsuQBzKBowiFqrDS0rxyfGImX3vEctuV0NPhoTRACGMgSmWW39MYfdGa+F7q/bfUVZB9CNhZAHD0+PJTwpIdbpq3m2uYNkC6ESSgd3Ns7FqFojlBmwnJFnWQxR8VdJKaMAPuUJToIrIX3yVdsdDM+6eXPNNsu/v4SrBvqyCARaNwH+OaR26tsKBC1hGL6gIIw5U2vL2dz6lmkK5PS1kmv9dXqhKXD0bk7OAzY3nC9RwV19d0JB+52/AjslXGHm+5TFLd6BHicG6dw/+q3faHfeViwglMFjLXEXZbKZ+m63tvgpXTayM2T0H2wGis7xL25B/U/69PjRi4ytKzwi+mM/2eEAlSjvudxN2/eIxyaq1OTiI28dPrTUpnYdYHUTKMlOmHbxekXYHaAQ5s2oxXiXT4t2Gm689hSjouGZwxiy0t7RZNet7T4z5yUPwteTgAerNGCUvVNiYI19YODVUTdUV5LVkPqFw4qrqvnDJSp/gGrMvkoKDTFR377B9shq2/vGmO4+QTNKKfFy+3h7mTenpClOeuNSoaVu2I9U4/DAZZ4ZgpL5CCxKZ7VnhUnoA5QCP6K7+4murVcTDdfAGYb6C43L75jipZNy3z9pxQlvPGjlrZxaeAqJrjoMIS4E/+sRA8XBzHIeG/Rnldndou5PiTGR3zacP7eVs9Riub0UJS3/JXSHwBjlzcf8vEuH3LjEkRAQr+CYG0mXocu8Yjs6k2+p30s6IEXg9rly9fAZXquLcP0lhz13abw6jHbSQwqbiFdYbK+10CIj8UQWvxADa2I2GAWn4f+3kCE9WlXVW4RcItOxYnPyQkwW5hQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MWHPR1101MB2160.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a4da1702-b6f6-4285-099c-08d8882a4d8b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Nov 2020 23:17:34.2447 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: k235rjMlaKlg5LfwsZLxoSszOILDxMHUoghsjwQXiDp1wrDWqpHmSmZpIX5RSd6VgejHWRN6OmH3tNdmyTkxrJW52DUXM6ZA+kHbyyI3fDo= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW3PR11MB4668 Return-Path: nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Everyone, This RFC has been sitting for a while and it seems like we have reached a c= onclusion. I would like to make a request to the TianoCore stewards to crea= te 2 new git repositories in the project: 1. edkrepo 2. edkrepo-manifest Based on the current Maintainers.txt content, the following individuals sho= uld initially be given write access to these repositories: Nate DeSimone Ashley DeSimone I have taken a poll between myself and the other maintainer, and given that= the project is currently in transition to using GitHub pull requests we bo= th prefer to start out using the pull request method of code review for the= se new repositories. If there is any setup needed to enable pull request co= de review please do so. Let me know if the stewards need any more information to complete this requ= est. Thanks! Nate -----Original Message----- From: Desimone, Nathaniel L=20 Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 4:21 PM To: Bjorge, Erik C ; devel@edk2.groups.io; rfc@edk= 2.groups.io Cc: Desimone, Ashley E Subject: RE: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo Hi Erik, A separate manifest repository would probably be a good idea. The manifest = repo is used for a lot of EdkRepo's operations so having a smaller repo ded= icated repo could be beneficial from a performance standpoint. Thanks, Nate -----Original Message----- From: Bjorge, Erik C =20 Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 3:29 PM To: Desimone, Nathaniel L ; devel@edk2.grou= ps.io; rfc@edk2.groups.io Cc: Desimone, Ashley E Subject: RE: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo I am fine with a new repo. This also supports a good workflow to get a too= l that then lets you pull full platforms. In theory you would only ever re= ally need to clone a single repo manually (assuming reasonable manifest sup= port). Are you also looking at creating a separate manifest repo as well or just c= reating a manifest branch in the new EdkRepo repository? Thanks, -Erik -----Original Message----- From: Desimone, Nathaniel L =20 Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 2:56 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rfc@edk2.groups.io Cc: Desimone, Ashley E ; Bjorge, Erik C Subject: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo Hi Everyone, Given that EdkRepo has existed in the project for over a year now (in edk2-= staging) I think it is time to get out of staging. I have considered multip= le possible landing zones: 1. edk2 2. edk2-pytool-library 3. A new repository Edk2 does not seem like a good location as EdkRepo isn't strictly necessary= to build EDK II, and I think all of us would prefer that edk2 not become a= dumping ground. I have talked with the other maintainers of edk2-pytool-li= brary and they would prefer that EdkRepo not enter that repository because = EdkRepo does not have a robust set of unit tests yet and they don't want th= eir test coverage metrics to decline. Therefore, the best choice seems to b= e a new repository. As always if anyone has comments they are welcome! Thanks, Nate