public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Pawel Polawski <ppolawsk@redhat.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	"Gao, Liming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
	Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>,
	"Leif Lindholm" <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>,
	"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	"Chang, Abner" <abner.chang@hpe.com>,
	"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridge: io range is not mandatory
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 03:08:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1631273DF7BA38B555ABF5718CFA9@MWHPR11MB1631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXEsAkpBpR+njguw+Lf6s3tqiaSAe=Ne0krtfee4eCgW0w@mail.gmail.com>

Ard,
can you explain more?

Your code changes the PciHostBridge driver to ignore the failure of IO allocation.
If IO requirement of certain PCI(E) devices can be ignored, can you change the IncompatiblePciDevice protocol implementation to override the IO request from the devices?

Thanks,
Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:49 AM
> To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pawel Polawski <ppolawsk@redhat.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>; Gao, Liming
> <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Oliver Steffen
> <osteffen@redhat.com>; Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>; Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; Yao,
> Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Chang, Abner <abner.chang@hpe.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridge: io range is not mandatory
> 
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 09:37, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > io range is not mandatory according to pcie spec,
> > so allow bridge configurations without io address
> > space assigned.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> 
> Could one of the MdeModulePkg maintainers please get this reviewed? Thanks.
> 
> > ---
> >  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
> > index b20bcd310ad5..712662707931 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
> > @@ -1085,6 +1085,9 @@ NotifyPhase (
> >                RootBridge->ResAllocNode[Index].Base   = BaseAddress;
> >                RootBridge->ResAllocNode[Index].Status = ResAllocated;
> >                DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "Success\n"));
> > +            } else if ((Index == TypeIo) && (RootBridge->Io.Base == MAX_UINT64)) {
> > +              /* optional on PCIe */
> > +              DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "PCI Root Bridge does not provide IO Resources.\n"));
> >              } else {
> >                ReturnStatus = EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> >                DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Out Of Resource!\n"));
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22  7:37 [PATCH v5 0/6] OvmfPkg/Microvm/pcie: add pcie support Gerd Hoffmann
2022-04-22  7:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridge: io range is not mandatory Gerd Hoffmann
2022-04-25 20:49   ` [edk2-devel] " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-04-27  0:32     ` 回复: " gaoliming
2022-04-27  3:08     ` Ni, Ray [this message]
2022-04-29  6:50       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-04-29  7:00         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-04-29  8:13           ` Ni, Ray
2022-04-29  8:47             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-04-29  9:08               ` Ni, Ray
2022-04-29  9:46                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-05-02 10:48       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-05-23 11:48         ` Albecki, Mateusz
2022-05-24  6:24           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-05-25 18:26             ` Albecki, Mateusz
2022-05-31 16:11               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-06-02 10:00                 ` Ni, Ray
     [not found]     ` <16E9A2157ED8983D.16936@groups.io>
2022-04-27  3:13       ` Ni, Ray
2022-04-22  7:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] OvmfPkg/FdtPciHostBridgeLib: " Gerd Hoffmann
2022-04-22 15:01   ` Abner Chang
2022-04-22  7:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] OvmfPkg/Platform: unfix PcdPciExpressBaseAddress Gerd Hoffmann
2022-04-22  7:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] OvmfPkg/Microvm/pcie: no vbeshim please Gerd Hoffmann
2022-04-22  7:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] OvmfPkg/Microvm/pcie: mPhysMemAddressWidth tweak Gerd Hoffmann
2022-04-22  7:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] OvmfPkg/Microvm/pcie: add pcie support Gerd Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB1631273DF7BA38B555ABF5718CFA9@MWHPR11MB1631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox