Hi Jeff,

For the test for non-standard or vendor specific = protocols, in my initial idea, I would like to see them on a separate space= and can be built with SCT infrastructure thru description files and build = scripts provided by vendor.

Anyone can fetch the UEFI SCT or other specific t= est with his/her purpose/interest in this way easily. BTW, documents or spe= c link need be provided for user to understand test object and contribute t= est better.

Anyway, it is a good start to record the request = in Bugzilla Feature Request for further discussion.

Best Regards

Eric

From: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venk= atesh@arm.com>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 1:25 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Jeff Brasen (jbrasen@nvidia.com) <jbra= sen@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jin, Eric <eric.jin@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2-test] Location of tests for vendor/edk2 specific= protocols

+ Eric

Thanks Jeff for bringing this up.

As mentioned during our discussion on this topic = briefly @ UEFI Plugfest 2019, I definitely like to see these non-standard p= rotocol tests become part of test suite.

However, there has been no proposal yet, though t= here were proposals related to SBBR (Arm=92s Server Base Boot Requirements)= .

Currently, any new platform tests added have to b= e added to UEFI SCT description files and build scripts for it to be includ= ed as part of test suite.

May I request you to create Bugzilla Feature Requ= est @ https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/ under =93edk-test=94 product and =93UE= FI-SCT=94 component, as well expand on how you like this to be implemented?=

Supreeth

From: devel@edk2.groups.io <de= vel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jeff Brasen via Groups.Io
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 5:53 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: [edk2-devel] [edk2-test] Location of tests for vendor/edk2= specific protocols

&nb= sp;

Now that we have the edk2-test repo with the SCT = infrastructure, has there been any thought for where tests that use this fo= r non-standardized protocols should live? My initial thought is along with = the protocols in edk2/edk2-platforms. For example if you had Silicon/NVIDIA/Include/Procotol/x.h you would have= Silicon/NVIDIA/TestCase/x/ for this. Has there been any thoughts/plans on = this?

Thanks,
Jeff

This email message is for the sole use of the int= ended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unau= thorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If yo= u are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.=

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and = any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not= the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not di= sclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. T= hank you.