public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"stefanb@linux.ibm.com" <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "mhaeuser@posteo.de" <mhaeuser@posteo.de>,
	"spbrogan@outlook.com" <spbrogan@outlook.com>,
	"marcandre.lureau@redhat.com" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
	"kraxel@redhat.com" <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/8] Ovmf: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:05:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB488568FF491CBF7925F8E4388CD29@PH0PR11MB4885.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb85fbee-9ee2-c350-991c-63c5fb077b07@linux.ibm.com>

For 2, https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-platforms/tree/master/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Tcg

The edk2-platform solution is to let Tcg2PlatformDxe and Tcg2PlatformPei link Library/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.

The DSC/FDF can include Tcg2PlatformDxe and Tcg2PlatformPei. No BDS change is required.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Stefan
> Berger
> Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 9:50 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Stefan Berger
> <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: mhaeuser@posteo.de; spbrogan@outlook.com;
> marcandre.lureau@redhat.com; kraxel@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/8] Ovmf: Disable the TPM2 platform
> hierarchy
> 
> 
> On 9/6/21 8:34 AM, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> > Hi Stefan
> > Thank you very much for the work.
> >
> > I would like to double confirm with you on several things:
> > 1) S3 resume - According to security guideline, we can randomize platform
> hiearachy if S3 start state fail.
> >
> > REF: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-
> platforms/blob/master/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Tcg/Tcg2PlatformPei/T
> cg2PlatformPei.c
> >
> > But I did not see your S3 solution there.
> 
> That may be a omission, also for ARM.
> 
> 
> >
> > 2) I am curious, why you don't use a DXE driver, but choose to like to BDS lib
> for the DXE case.
> 
> I don't know the difference. Is the code in edk2-platforms unsuitable?
> 
> 
> > You also include a NULL lib there, which seems unnecessary, if you use a
> DXE/PEI module
> >
> > The downside of linking to BDS lib is that you have to change all BDS lib
> instance, which is a big burden.
> > And you still have code to choose NULL lib v.s. real Lib based upon TPM enable
> flag.
> >
> > How about just include Tcg2PlatformPei/Tcg2PlatformDxe to securityPkg as
> well? Then we can remove the TcgPlatform from MinPlatform totally.
> >
> > 3) In some platform, you add TpmPlatformHierarchyLib to Tcg2Dxe. Would
> you please help me understand why?
> >
> >    SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Dxe/Tcg2Dxe.inf {
> >      <LibraryClasses>
> >
> Tpm2DeviceLib|SecurityPkg/Library/Tpm2DeviceLibRouter/Tpm2DeviceLibRout
> erDxe.inf
> >
> TpmPlatformHierarchyLib|SecurityPkg/Library/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib/
> PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.inf
> >
> NULL|SecurityPkg/Library/Tpm2DeviceLibDTpm/Tpm2InstanceLibDTpm.inf
> 
> I cannot compile several of the target platforms that I have made
> modifications to that I thought were correct but have done so 'blindly'.
> For example , I cannot compile for OvmfPkg/AmdSev/AmdSevX64.dsc, it
> fails for me for this reason:
> 
> # build -p OvmfPkg/AmdSev/AmdSevX64.dsc -b DEBUG -a X64 -t GCC5 -D
> TPM_ENABLE -D TPM_CONFIG_ENABLE -D SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE -D
> NETWORK_TLS_ENABLE
> 
> mkfs.fat 4.2 (2021-01-31)
> grub2-mkimage: error: cannot open `/usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/moddep.lst':
> No such file or directory.
> 
> 
> This here is an example of a platform I cannot build at all (before my
> modifications) but would need changes as well:
> 
> $ build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc -b DEBUG -a IA32 -t GCC5 -D
> TPM_ENABLE -D TPM_CONFIG_ENABLE -D SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE -D
> NETWORK_TLS_ENABLE
> 
> [...]
> 
> Active Platform          = /home/stefanb/dev/edk2/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc
> .
> 
> build.py...
>   : error F001: Module
> /home/stefanb/dev/edk2/MdeModulePkg/Universal/DevicePathDxe/DevicePat
> hDxe.inf
> NOT found in DSC file; Is it really a binary module?
> 
> 
> 
> Should I drop the targets I cannot compile for or that seem broken just
> to begin with?
> 
> 
> Does someone else want to take a pass on this series? I have to say that
> I work with too many unknowns here so that this is now the preferred
> path from my perspective.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>     Stefan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-06 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-01 21:21 [PATCH v5 0/8] Ovmf: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy Stefan Berger
2021-09-01 21:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] SecurityPkg/TPM: Import PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.c from edk2-platforms Stefan Berger
2021-09-01 21:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] SecurityPkg/TPM: Fix bugs in imported PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib Stefan Berger
2021-09-01 21:21 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] SecurityPkg/TPM: Add a NULL implementation of TpmPlatformHierarchyLib Stefan Berger
2021-09-01 21:21 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] SecurityPkg: Introduce new PCD PcdRandomizePlatformHierarchy Stefan Berger
2021-09-01 21:21 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] OvmfPkg: Reference new TPM classes in the build system for compilation Stefan Berger
2021-09-01 21:21 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] OvmfPkg: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy Stefan Berger
2021-09-01 21:21 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] ArmVirtPkg: Reference new TPM classes in the build system for compilation Stefan Berger
2021-09-01 21:21 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] ArmVirtPkg: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy Stefan Berger
2021-09-02  1:27 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/8] Ovmf: " Stefan Berger
2021-09-06 12:34 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-06 13:50   ` [edk2-devel] " Stefan Berger
2021-09-06 15:05     ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
     [not found]     ` <16A243F1DBDE42C8.5578@groups.io>
2021-09-06 15:07       ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-07 19:41         ` Stefan Berger
2021-09-07 19:44         ` Stefan Berger
2021-09-08 12:53   ` Stefan Berger
2021-09-08 14:37     ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-08 20:34       ` Stefan Berger
2021-09-09  0:19         ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-09 11:13           ` Stefan Berger
2021-09-09 11:37             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-09 16:15               ` Stefan Berger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB488568FF491CBF7925F8E4388CD29@PH0PR11MB4885.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox