From: "Min Xu" <min.m.xu@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@google.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Xu, Min M" <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg: Reserve the Ovmf work area as RT_DATA
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:47:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5064504351F3EC370731D1A3C5729@PH0PR11MB5064.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c20498d3-a28e-4279-265b-fbb4c51ee99e@amd.com>
On August 23, 2022 9:07 PM, Lendacky,Thomas wrote:
> On 8/23/22 03:40, Xu, Min M wrote:
> > On August 23, 2022 3:38 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> Ah, I forget to reserve the work-area as RT_Data in below code:
> >>> BuildMemoryAllocationHob (
> >>> (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)FixedPcdGet32
> >> (PcdOvmfWorkAreaBase),
> >>> (UINT64)(UINTN)FixedPcdGet32 (PcdOvmfWorkAreaSize),
> >>> PlatformInfoHob->S3Supported ? EfiACPIMemoryNVS :
> >> EfiRuntimeServicesData <-- ACPI_NVS is not accessible either in OS-
> Runtime.
> >>> );
> >>>
> >> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/Library/Platfor
> >> m
> >>> InitLib/MemDetect.c#L1022-L1026
> >>
> >> With that changed to use EfiRuntimeServicesData unconditionally the
> >> page fault is gone.
> >>
> >>> Gerd, do you think we can reserve Ovmf WorkArea as RT_Data even when
> >> S3 is supported?
> >>
> >> Hmm, not fully sure how the various memory types are handled when the
> >> VM is suspended.
> >>
> > Tom suggested that the work area should not be kept around. In stead a
> PCD should be used.
> > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92617
> >
> > But the dynamic PCD is not thread-safe and it cannot be accessed by APs.
> >
> > Now we have 2 solutions to fix this issue.
> > 1. Reserve the Ovmf work area as RT_DATA.
> > 2. Split the CcProbeLib into 2 instances. See
> > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91132
> >
> > Gerd & Tom, what's your thought?
>
> Runtime service call are restricted so that you don't have concurrent threads
> executing (see section 8.1 of the specification). Without that you would have
> problems with runtime services today.
>
One of the situation of CcProbe used is in BaseIoLib.
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Library/BaseIoLibIntrinsic/IoLibInternalTdx.c#L35-L40
BaseIoLib is a basic library and it may be called by APs. While dynamic PCD access is not allowed in APs. Of course we can cache the PCD in a variable but I think it is still not safe.
Reserving the OVMF work area as RT_DATA breaks the original intention of the design.
Then how about this solution?
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91132
We can design 2 instances of CcProbe. One is to read the OvmfWorkArea. The other is to call Cc guest specific way to determine the type.
Thanks
Min
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-25 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 2:23 [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg: Reserve the Ovmf work area as RT_DATA Min Xu
2022-08-22 8:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-23 1:34 ` Min Xu
2022-08-23 7:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-23 8:40 ` Min Xu
2022-08-23 13:07 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2022-08-25 5:47 ` Min Xu [this message]
2022-08-25 7:42 ` [edk2-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-25 7:56 ` Min Xu
2022-08-25 8:15 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-22 13:18 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2022-08-23 1:38 ` Min Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB5064504351F3EC370731D1A3C5729@PH0PR11MB5064.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox