Re: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] RFC: design review for TDVF in OVMF

["Min Xu" <min.m.xu@intel.com>]

On 06/24/2021 8:36 AM, James Bottomley wrote: 
> On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 00:24 +0000, Min Xu wrote:
> > On 06/22/2021 9:39 PM, Laszlo wrote:
> > > I should clarify: the relevant part of my preference is not that
> > > "IntelTdx.dsc"
> > > contain the *complete* TDVF feature set. The relevant part (for me)
> > > is that "OvmfPkgX64.dsc" *not* be over-complicated for the sake of
> > > TDX, even considering only the "basic" TDVF feature set. It's fine
> > > to implement TDX in two stages ("basic" and "complete"); my point is
> > > that even "basic"
> > > should not over-
> > > complicate "OvmfPkgX64.dsc".
> > >
> > Thanks much for the comments and we don't want to make OvmfPkgX64.dsc
> > over-complicated either.
> > We have updated the design slides to V0.95 and Slides 6-15 are
> > discussing the Config-A and Config-B.
> > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/files/Designs/2021/0611/TDVF_Design_Rev
> > iew%28v0.95%29.pptx
> > Your comment is always welcome!
> 
> The mailing list still won't give me that file, can you update it in the bugzilla:
> 
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
> 
> As well, please?
>
Sure. TDVF Design Review v0.95 is uploaded to
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
>
Thanks
Min