From: "Bret Barkelew" <bret.barkelew@microsoft.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Subject: VariablePolicy: Final Changes Thread 2 - ECC & UnitTest
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 00:28:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR21MB1864408DA9492E0C0F77B5A0EF0A0@PH0PR21MB1864.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1162 bytes --]
I’ve worked through all the ECC issues with Variable Policy (AND the UnitTests) on this branch:
Commits · corthon/edk2 (github.com)<https://github.com/corthon/edk2/commits/var_policy_dev_submission_v8>
I even wrote the Main() entry point lib that Laszlo suggested (it works rather nicely):
TEMP: Staging for HostTest entry point · corthon/edk2@4ce5210 (github.com)<https://github.com/corthon/edk2/commit/4ce52108b3e1bcb2ba78995be94c3949fe647eda>
However, there’s one that I just can’t get past and I would like to take it up with the community. I don’t think that UnitTests should have to deal with the “can’t initialize variables in declaration” check. Almost none of the solutions that I tested worked, and the ones that did were too cumbersome. They failed on two key points that are important for test writing:
* They were annoying to write ===> fewer tests.
* They moved even more of the test case data away from the test ===> harder to read tests.
I would like to move for an exception for unit tests (or at least host-based unit tests), but I don’t know how to accomplish that from a technical standpoint.
Thoughts?
- Bret
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5456 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-07 0:28 Bret Barkelew [this message]
2020-10-07 1:46 ` VariablePolicy: Final Changes Thread 2 - ECC & UnitTest Michael D Kinney
2020-10-07 13:42 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-07 14:27 ` Andrew Fish
2020-10-07 15:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-07 16:44 ` [EXTERNAL] " Bret Barkelew
2020-10-07 18:19 ` Michael D Kinney
2020-10-08 13:10 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-07 16:24 ` Michael D Kinney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR21MB1864408DA9492E0C0F77B5A0EF0A0@PH0PR21MB1864.namprd21.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox