public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Abner Chang" <abner.chang@hpe.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"liming.gao@intel.com" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V edk2 port
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:45:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TU4PR8401MB04295E8B7242163B73DA94B0FFD20@TU4PR8401MB0429.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR11MB3972706C581CF30ED987184180D20@BN6PR11MB3972.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Liming Gao
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 5:17 PM
> To: Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <abner.chang@hpe.com>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V edk2
> port
> 
> Abner:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <abner.chang@hpe.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 9:05 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V
> > edk2 port
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf
> > > Of Liming Gao
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 8:55 AM
> > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist)
> > > <abner.chang@hpe.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V
> > > edk2 port
> > >
> > > Abner:
> > >   Here is my minor comments.
> > > 1.  For RISC-V processor related definitions, have they been defined
> > > in public definitions?
> > Are you referring to RiscV.h, RiscVOpenSbi.h and the corresponding
> > spec? Those are defined in RISC-V privilege spec and RISC-V SBI spec (not
> all of definitions).
> >
> I want to confirm whether the change in UefiSpec.h has been defined in
> public UEFI spec.
Yes,
The changes in UefiSpec.h  - UEFI spec 2.8a
The changes in UefiBaseType.h and PeImage.h  - Microsoft PE COFF spec v8.3
The changes in PxeBaseCode.h - www.ietf.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters/dhcpv6-parameters.xml

> 
> > > 2.  For MdePkg/BaseSynchronizationLib, why name file
> > > SynchronizationAsm.S? Can it name to Synchronization.S?
> > Hmm... I have no idea about why I named  it this way hahah...Yes. we
> > can name it as Synchronization.S.  I will resend the patches once you give
> comments on all patches? Or you already done the review?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Liming
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of
> > > Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist)
> > > Sent: 2020年4月10日 15:21
> > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > Cc: Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <abner.chang@hpe.com>
> > > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V edk2
> > > port
> > >
> > > MdePkg modules and definitionsfor RISC-V architecture on edk2.
> > >
> > > BZ for entire RISC-V edk2 port,
> > > INVALID URI REMOVED
> > > 3A__bugzilla.tianocore.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-
> > >
> 3D2672&d=DwIFAg&c=C5b8zRQO1miGmBeVZ2LFWg&r=_SN6FZBN4Vgi4Ulks
> > > kz6qU3NYRO03nHp9P7Z5q59A3E&m=i2pc5cGhlgc-
> > >
> Pd56r1673_LslTQbDe_XaFESUeh4tsE&s=m6Rw9jDskrzU3JlGDX4TQOji5DrEKO
> > > 6wGXu5-OqkReY&e=
> > >
> > > These commits are verified by below PR,
> > > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/512
> > >
> > > Abner Chang (9):
> > >   MdePkg: RISC-V RV64 binding in MdePkg
> > >   MdePkg/Include: RISC-V definitions.
> > >   MdePkg/BaseLib: BaseLib for RISC-V RV64 Processor.
> > >   MdePkg/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib: RISC-V cache maintenance
> > >     implementation.
> > >   MdePkg/BaseIoLibIntrinsic: Rename IoLibArm.c=>IoLibNoIo.c
> > >   MdePkg/BasePeCoff: Add RISC-V PE/Coff related code.
> > >   MdePkg/BaseCpuLib: RISC-V Base CPU library implementation.
> > >   MdePkg/BaseSynchronizationLib: RISC-V cache related code.
> > >   MdePkg/BaseSafeIntLib: Add RISCV64 arch for BaseSafeIntLib.
> > >
> > >  MdePkg/MdePkg.dec                             |   5 +-
> > >  MdePkg/MdePkg.dsc                             |   3 +-
> > >  .../BaseCacheMaintenanceLib.inf               |   4 +
> > >  MdePkg/Library/BaseCpuLib/BaseCpuLib.inf      |   6 +-
> > >  .../BaseIoLibIntrinsic/BaseIoLibIntrinsic.inf |  12 +-
> > >  MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/BaseLib.inf            |  18 +-
> > >  .../Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoffLib.inf   |   5 +
> > >  .../Library/BaseSafeIntLib/BaseSafeIntLib.inf |   6 +-
> > >  .../BaseSynchronizationLib.inf                |   5 +
> > >  MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PeImage.h     |  12 +
> > >  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h              |  26 ++
> > >  MdePkg/Include/Protocol/DebugSupport.h        |  55 ++++
> > >  MdePkg/Include/Protocol/PxeBaseCode.h         |   4 +
> > >  MdePkg/Include/RiscV64/ProcessorBind.h        | 173 ++++++++++++
> > >  MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiBaseType.h            |  13 +
> > >  MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h                |   5 +
> > >  .../BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoffLibInternals.h    |   9 +
> > >  .../BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c      | 250
> ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../{IoLibArm.c => IoLibNoIo.c}               |   4 +-
> > >  .../Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/CpuBreakpoint.c   |  27 ++
> > >  MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/CpuPause.c     |  29 ++
> > >  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/DisableInterrupts.c       |  24 ++
> > >  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/EnableInterrupts.c        |  25 ++
> > >  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/GetInterruptState.c       |  35 +++
> > >  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/InternalSwitchStack.c     |  55 ++++
> > >  MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/LongJump.c     |  32 +++
> > >  MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c     |   3 +-
> > >  .../BasePeCoffLib/RiscV/PeCoffLoaderEx.c      | 133 ++++++++++
> > >  MdePkg/Library/BaseCpuLib/BaseCpuLib.uni      |   5 +-
> > >  MdePkg/Library/BaseCpuLib/RiscV/Cpu.S         |  19 ++
> > >  MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/FlushCache.S   |  21 ++
> > >  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVCpuBreakpoint.S      |  14 +
> > >  .../Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVCpuPause.S   |  14 +
> > >  .../Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVInterrupt.S  |  32 +++
> > >  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVSetJumpLongJump.S    |  55 ++++
> > >  .../Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoffLib.uni   |   2 +
> > >  .../RiscV64/SynchronizationAsm.S              |  78 ++++++
> > >  37 files changed, 1204 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)  create mode
> > > 100644 MdePkg/Include/RiscV64/ProcessorBind.h
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
> > >  rename MdePkg/Library/BaseIoLibIntrinsic/{IoLibArm.c =>
> > > IoLibNoIo.c} (94%) create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/CpuBreakpoint.c
> > >  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/CpuPause.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/DisableInterrupts.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/EnableInterrupts.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/GetInterruptState.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/InternalSwitchStack.c
> > >  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/LongJump.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/RiscV/PeCoffLoaderEx.c
> > >  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseCpuLib/RiscV/Cpu.S
> > >  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/FlushCache.S
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVCpuBreakpoint.S
> > >  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVCpuPause.S
> > >  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVInterrupt.S
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVSetJumpLongJump.S
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > MdePkg/Library/BaseSynchronizationLib/RiscV64/SynchronizationAsm.S
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.25.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <160466638D74146F.10131@groups.io>
2020-04-21  0:54 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V edk2 port Liming Gao
2020-04-21  1:04   ` Abner Chang
2020-04-22  9:17     ` Liming Gao
2020-04-22 14:45       ` Abner Chang [this message]
2020-04-22 14:48         ` Liming Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TU4PR8401MB04295E8B7242163B73DA94B0FFD20@TU4PR8401MB0429.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox