public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Abner Chang" <abner.chang@hpe.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"liming.gao@intel.com" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V edk2 port
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 01:04:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TU4PR8401MB0429C2897056A67E3AE8EFA9FFD50@TU4PR8401MB0429.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR11MB3972C86E433B5B249D66D08C80D50@BN6PR11MB3972.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Liming Gao
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 8:55 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist)
> <abner.chang@hpe.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V edk2
> port
> 
> Abner:
>   Here is my minor comments.
> 1.  For RISC-V processor related definitions, have they been defined in public
> definitions?
Are you referring to RiscV.h, RiscVOpenSbi.h and the corresponding spec? Those are defined in RISC-V privilege spec and RISC-V SBI spec (not all of definitions).

> 2.  For MdePkg/BaseSynchronizationLib, why name file
> SynchronizationAsm.S? Can it name to Synchronization.S?
Hmm... I have no idea about why I named  it this way hahah...Yes. we can name it as Synchronization.S.  I will resend the patches once you give comments on all patches? Or you already done the review?
> 
> Thanks
> Liming
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Chang,
> Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist)
> Sent: 2020年4月10日 15:21
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <abner.chang@hpe.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V edk2 port
> 
> MdePkg modules and definitionsfor RISC-V architecture on edk2.
> 
> BZ for entire RISC-V edk2 port,
> INVALID URI REMOVED
> 3A__bugzilla.tianocore.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-
> 3D2672&d=DwIFAg&c=C5b8zRQO1miGmBeVZ2LFWg&r=_SN6FZBN4Vgi4Ulks
> kz6qU3NYRO03nHp9P7Z5q59A3E&m=i2pc5cGhlgc-
> Pd56r1673_LslTQbDe_XaFESUeh4tsE&s=m6Rw9jDskrzU3JlGDX4TQOji5DrEKO
> 6wGXu5-OqkReY&e=
> 
> These commits are verified by below PR,
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/512
> 
> Abner Chang (9):
>   MdePkg: RISC-V RV64 binding in MdePkg
>   MdePkg/Include: RISC-V definitions.
>   MdePkg/BaseLib: BaseLib for RISC-V RV64 Processor.
>   MdePkg/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib: RISC-V cache maintenance
>     implementation.
>   MdePkg/BaseIoLibIntrinsic: Rename IoLibArm.c=>IoLibNoIo.c
>   MdePkg/BasePeCoff: Add RISC-V PE/Coff related code.
>   MdePkg/BaseCpuLib: RISC-V Base CPU library implementation.
>   MdePkg/BaseSynchronizationLib: RISC-V cache related code.
>   MdePkg/BaseSafeIntLib: Add RISCV64 arch for BaseSafeIntLib.
> 
>  MdePkg/MdePkg.dec                             |   5 +-
>  MdePkg/MdePkg.dsc                             |   3 +-
>  .../BaseCacheMaintenanceLib.inf               |   4 +
>  MdePkg/Library/BaseCpuLib/BaseCpuLib.inf      |   6 +-
>  .../BaseIoLibIntrinsic/BaseIoLibIntrinsic.inf |  12 +-
>  MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/BaseLib.inf            |  18 +-
>  .../Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoffLib.inf   |   5 +
>  .../Library/BaseSafeIntLib/BaseSafeIntLib.inf |   6 +-
>  .../BaseSynchronizationLib.inf                |   5 +
>  MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PeImage.h     |  12 +
>  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h              |  26 ++
>  MdePkg/Include/Protocol/DebugSupport.h        |  55 ++++
>  MdePkg/Include/Protocol/PxeBaseCode.h         |   4 +
>  MdePkg/Include/RiscV64/ProcessorBind.h        | 173 ++++++++++++
>  MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiBaseType.h            |  13 +
>  MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h                |   5 +
>  .../BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoffLibInternals.h    |   9 +
>  .../BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c      | 250 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../{IoLibArm.c => IoLibNoIo.c}               |   4 +-
>  .../Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/CpuBreakpoint.c   |  27 ++
>  MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/CpuPause.c     |  29 ++
>  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/DisableInterrupts.c       |  24 ++
>  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/EnableInterrupts.c        |  25 ++
>  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/GetInterruptState.c       |  35 +++
>  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/InternalSwitchStack.c     |  55 ++++
>  MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/LongJump.c     |  32 +++
>  MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c     |   3 +-
>  .../BasePeCoffLib/RiscV/PeCoffLoaderEx.c      | 133 ++++++++++
>  MdePkg/Library/BaseCpuLib/BaseCpuLib.uni      |   5 +-
>  MdePkg/Library/BaseCpuLib/RiscV/Cpu.S         |  19 ++
>  MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/FlushCache.S   |  21 ++
>  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVCpuBreakpoint.S      |  14 +
>  .../Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVCpuPause.S   |  14 +
>  .../Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVInterrupt.S  |  32 +++
>  .../BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVSetJumpLongJump.S    |  55 ++++
>  .../Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoffLib.uni   |   2 +
>  .../RiscV64/SynchronizationAsm.S              |  78 ++++++
>  37 files changed, 1204 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
> MdePkg/Include/RiscV64/ProcessorBind.h
>  create mode 100644
> MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
>  rename MdePkg/Library/BaseIoLibIntrinsic/{IoLibArm.c => IoLibNoIo.c} (94%)
> create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/CpuBreakpoint.c
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/CpuPause.c
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/DisableInterrupts.c
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/EnableInterrupts.c
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/GetInterruptState.c
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/InternalSwitchStack.c
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/LongJump.c
>  create mode 100644
> MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/RiscV/PeCoffLoaderEx.c
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseCpuLib/RiscV/Cpu.S
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/FlushCache.S
>  create mode 100644
> MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVCpuBreakpoint.S
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVCpuPause.S
>  create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVInterrupt.S
>  create mode 100644
> MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/RiscV64/RiscVSetJumpLongJump.S
>  create mode 100644
> MdePkg/Library/BaseSynchronizationLib/RiscV64/SynchronizationAsm.S
> 
> --
> 2.25.0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <160466638D74146F.10131@groups.io>
2020-04-21  0:54 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/9] MdePkg changes for RISC-V edk2 port Liming Gao
2020-04-21  1:04   ` Abner Chang [this message]
2020-04-22  9:17     ` Liming Gao
2020-04-22 14:45       ` Abner Chang
2020-04-22 14:48         ` Liming Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TU4PR8401MB0429C2897056A67E3AE8EFA9FFD50@TU4PR8401MB0429.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox