From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com (mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com [148.163.147.86]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.4018.1587395273725182332 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:07:53 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: hpe.com, ip: 148.163.147.86, mailfrom: prvs=037915fef8=abner.chang@hpe.com) Received: from pps.filterd (m0148663.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03KF41Pr015262 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:07:53 GMT Received: from g4t3427.houston.hpe.com (g4t3427.houston.hpe.com [15.241.140.73]) by mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30gb4xh98f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:07:50 +0000 Received: from G4W9120.americas.hpqcorp.net (exchangepmrr1.us.hpecorp.net [16.210.21.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g4t3427.houston.hpe.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC7B6A for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G9W8454.americas.hpqcorp.net (2002:10d8:a104::10d8:a104) by G4W9120.americas.hpqcorp.net (2002:10d2:150f::10d2:150f) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:07:49 +0000 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (15.241.52.10) by G9W8454.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.216.161.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:07:49 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=QwyNv4g+4FNf7nbyWvmWYxhzyA5IsrHsjrpb0s9AwnvV/pxJH+RLY/rJdY1vUck2RPSXoB7DMjiXTi2lEQQ2FlF+IBZWLrlYFnwXbHQ264Yb59c+yiJiv9TAOfgrh/lxoYCxXH2+rTsyui7wOWsDN5nVYM2nTRCaI+gFW2IoA3CRSuvmG54y6mNK1tjdG9gwXjjrAACQPiv02/DmdZt++6hempf52hamaRFjD2smIIpB/cKZzGeSPFgTekXhVmlmNvojGMwaMEqbctxL6pYruVTra5ce4EKFKy7Id9XC3A6X1X+qJ8ejd8Nqr3jPR2xyDgqy3GA7s8YtpINnOqdB1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=AIB/KIjsB9Dp02B8JHMuISykZ5LANA7JyldK7xvsT7A=; b=DmdznFRVt2zjbicMrFap9ZH9qtUNcykXKmMkjxkXWQzoRUMk7aoMvmvuMfwpPECFTxIgfh7o21xR+Qg6Vvs/fWkhgRpGaTlf96y64yQXzWycdG2oODnrdrqUhHKvjy8BfpxBcHfezQXtO71Li8cppR3QM/omHsy8eUsI9mTittFz+pdJpJg0PGX8jHwAjfaqYRts7XJ1f2h+XZ1VLBRQoHVrPUrN8mZU8WQnJPRddJEbqQE6E9dToDILXieIFRIFujGRkQa/UDCUiHHa/nS9cGQ7DjKA+VP8/2W+BVGL2tcBRk7BKGkvEEaUvF+Dg66ZkYTMhUQj9TttHjezc4qThA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hpe.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=hpe.com; dkim=pass header.d=hpe.com; arc=none Received: from TU4PR8401MB0429.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:770a::14) by TU4PR8401MB0511.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7709::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.27; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:07:48 +0000 Received: from TU4PR8401MB0429.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::38ba:b525:f979:8411]) by TU4PR8401MB0429.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::38ba:b525:f979:8411%11]) with mapi id 15.20.2921.030; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:07:48 +0000 From: "Abner Chang" To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" CC: "Kinney, Michael D" , "Ni, Ray" , "Wang, Nickle (HPS SW)" Subject: edk2 repo for RedfishPkg Thread-Topic: edk2 repo for RedfishPkg Thread-Index: AdYXItSrkWDnzCqTSUCXoP5jTaGJWQ== Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:07:47 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [16.242.247.131] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fdfc5cc9-29c3-4037-d1ac-08d7e53c9663 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: TU4PR8401MB0511: x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882; x-forefront-prvs: 03793408BA x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:TU4PR8401MB0429.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFTY:;SFS:(10019020)(376002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(4744005)(7696005)(54906003)(4326008)(81156014)(52536014)(86362001)(8676002)(33656002)(66556008)(66446008)(64756008)(2906002)(76116006)(8936002)(6916009)(4743002)(55016002)(26005)(5660300002)(478600001)(6506007)(66476007)(316002)(66946007)(186003)(71200400001)(9686003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: hpe.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: on/7lvQif+LXzpV9vXAEDS7U3onsOWe9O1Hd8rsE7vxkMCQOwSWrFe8WPVH9Y3j146zuqupJx9WYiYf4Rd3879T0hPY/I2I0OcfOXA8yLW7e8nAw50Iqnt9CDtE4a3Zl6+rg8//M/CZhD53SMBzoS1v5o3KWzSUSDCNnTXAJ47oJdlcW+aUtXJs1ppiUbhIzCqZ8ktqVJKlMUemIMa34kFOXTEWW7A1d3Ad9uIBo7ZiQFBm4z6QcV4PnD217TlfnumFzb3YH1+H2mCky8qvMQhqjpOEeVzPOKT/87wUcs02/Ab41wqCpUffaoCJP+u6qgSsoaPf7ay264GHJPDzBC8W23FsLyaGHc8mQ69OusUHrVY9/fe/Yv4ySwdbv9M5MDSIaEMEHUp6oYjOEZO0ByS+ltcAgMpYLs0gI/ldU1Fvt0pJh5pTW1mHbh62jVWHu x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 1dqau39VKnV0ddiA0/nPDUwlBkwKqh1vQkES4JGC1oUX91UbkGHVBS5B1j/J3oLbnQS2vvnvXaY5fElYB8AAsKwqFtFJ27PK9oWgAdMJymzfSqztsSIwMe1WIXXPARf9CRPJe2OKY/Pw+VJzoFB+ww== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fdfc5cc9-29c3-4037-d1ac-08d7e53c9663 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Apr 2020 15:07:47.8437 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 105b2061-b669-4b31-92ac-24d304d195dc X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ClGomuWIRGyGA/heWMKe5pOGu8txU7Y390Qo3EAcQ6Q/2Ep4v1znk15rph1fNPece75xJRcgj7CvQGPdsaaHKA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: TU4PR8401MB0511 X-OriginatorOrg: hpe.com X-HPE-SCL: -1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-20_05:2020-04-20,2020-04-20 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=807 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004200127 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_TU4PR8401MB0429FE8C0E73F74593280C6DFFD40TU4PR8401MB0429_" --_000_TU4PR8401MB0429FE8C0E73F74593280C6DFFD40TU4PR8401MB0429_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi edk2 community members, Per to the short discussion with Mike and Ray, we would like to know your o= pinions regard to which edk2 repo to accommodate RedfishPkg, edk2/RedfshPk= g or edk2-platforms/Features/RedfishPkg? The current direction of edk2 open source is going to reduce the size and s= ome features were moved to edk2-platform already (e.g. edk2-platforms/Featu= res/Intel). Although RedfishPkg is a FW core feature however not all of systems require= this. For example, most of client systems don't need Redfish for the out o= f band management so far, maybe later. My current idea is put RedfishPkg under edk2-platforms/Features, however I = am also fine with having this package to under edk2 repo. What is your opinion? edk2 or edk2-platforms? Thanks Abner --_000_TU4PR8401MB0429FE8C0E73F74593280C6DFFD40TU4PR8401MB0429_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi edk2 community members,

Per to the short discussion with Mike and Ray, we wo= uld like to know your opinions regard to which edk2 repo to accommodate &nb= sp;RedfishPkg, edk2/RedfshPkg or edk2-platforms/Features/RedfishPkg?

The current direction of edk2 open source is going t= o reduce the size and some features were moved to edk2-platform already (e.= g. edk2-platforms/Features/Intel).

Although RedfishPkg is a FW core feature however not= all of systems require this. For example, most of client systems don’= ;t need Redfish for the out of band management so far, maybe  later.

My current idea is put RedfishPkg under edk2-platfor= ms/Features, however I am also fine with having this package to under edk2 = repo.

What is your opinion? edk2 or edk2-platforms?

 

Thanks

Abner

 

--_000_TU4PR8401MB0429FE8C0E73F74593280C6DFFD40TU4PR8401MB0429_--