From: "Cohen, Eugene" <eugene@hp.com>
To: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
"Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: DHCP Automatic Configure at Driver Connect
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:17:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <TU4PR84MB0302CC29EA5337CE4DB49E31B4140@TU4PR84MB0302.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B7274137C819F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Jiaxin,
> Ip4Config2OnDhcp4SbInstalled() maybe confused you, but it's not accurate
> as you said "when the DHCP SB is installed you do a configure automatically".
> It's more proper to say "IPv4 driver is requiring DHCP SB due to it detects the
> DHCP policy." In such a case, it's reasonable with the function
> Ip4Config2OnDhcp4SbInstalled().
I see - my observation was based on the fact that removing this prevented the undesirable automatic configuration, but what you say makes sense.
> I agree with you this code did not exist in *Ip4Dxe* before. We implemented
> this function because of we need start the AutoConfig due to the DHCP
> policy is detected by Ip4Dxe driver (DHCP policy (note: NOT DHCP SB)
> together with D.O.R.A process). It does may appear AutoConfig straight away
> with DHCP SB if Ip4Dxe ahead of Dhcp4Dxe. But the precondition is that the
> DHCP policy has been detected. If the policy is not DHCP during the system
> boot, I think your concern will not appear.
Are you saying the IP4 interface will not come "up" even for a static IP policy? I was assuming it would in this case. I'm not sure how big a deal this is because if there are no listeners or connections initiated it's kind of a don't-care - I think the only difference would be whether responses to ARP are provided.
> Now, compared to old Ip4Config behavior, we take 'ifconfig' tool command
> as example - "ifconfig -s eth0 dhcp":
> The Ip4Config->Start will be invoked to start the auto configuration. It was
> implemented in the deprecated driver -- Ip4ConfigDxe. When the system
> boot next time, the previous IP configuration will cleaned and the interface
> will be in UN-CONFIG status again. Current implementation don't have this
> clean-up operation no matter Static/DHCP policy has been set. Is this the
> difference you mentioned?
Okay - this must be it - so DHCP magically turned back into "unconfigured" effectively creating the on-demand Configure() effect, at least for DHCP cases, that we now desire. Interesting.
> Now, let us consider your requirement:
> 1) The IP config information stored in NVRAM
> 2) A separate policy to delay the IP interface coming up until a component
> calls Configure ().
>
> #1 is also the current implementation. For 2), I remember you have one
> patch to do this implementation, can you share it to us for better
> understanding?
Yes, my first thought was to make the handling of Ip4Config2OnDhcp4SbInstalled conditional based on a PCD value (the policy in this case, would be in the PCD value). Based on the limited experiment I did this seems to have the desired effect but based on your expertise perhaps there is a better location for such a check?
Thank you for patiently helping me with this - it's been enlightening to learn the history and thinking behind the config process.
Eugene
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-10 18:17 DHCP Automatic Configure at Driver Connect Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-11 1:50 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-11 3:03 ` Ye, Ting
2016-08-11 5:59 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-11 14:22 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-11 15:20 ` Samer El Haj Mahmoud
2016-08-12 1:31 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-12 12:31 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-13 2:37 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-15 14:40 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-16 3:05 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-16 19:41 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-17 5:50 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-17 12:17 ` Cohen, Eugene [this message]
2016-08-18 2:48 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-18 3:10 ` Ye, Ting
2016-08-18 14:30 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-16 1:14 ` Ye, Ting
2016-08-16 19:19 ` Cohen, Eugene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=TU4PR84MB0302CC29EA5337CE4DB49E31B4140@TU4PR84MB0302.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox