public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cohen, Eugene" <eugene@hp.com>
To: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
	"Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: DHCP Automatic Configure at Driver Connect
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:17:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TU4PR84MB0302CC29EA5337CE4DB49E31B4140@TU4PR84MB0302.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B7274137C819F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Jiaxin,

> Ip4Config2OnDhcp4SbInstalled() maybe confused you, but it's not accurate
> as you said "when the DHCP SB is installed you do a configure automatically".
> It's more proper to say "IPv4 driver is requiring DHCP SB due to it detects the
> DHCP policy." In such a case, it's reasonable with the function
> Ip4Config2OnDhcp4SbInstalled().

I see - my observation was based on the fact that removing this prevented the undesirable automatic configuration, but what you say makes sense.

> I agree with you this code did not exist in *Ip4Dxe* before. We implemented
> this function because of we need start the AutoConfig due to the DHCP
> policy is detected by Ip4Dxe driver (DHCP policy (note: NOT DHCP SB)
> together with D.O.R.A process). It does may appear AutoConfig straight away
> with DHCP SB if Ip4Dxe ahead of Dhcp4Dxe. But the precondition is that the
> DHCP policy has been detected.  If the policy is not DHCP during the system
> boot, I think your concern will not appear.

Are you saying the IP4 interface will not come "up" even for a static IP policy?  I was assuming it would in this case.  I'm not sure how big a deal this is because if there are no listeners or connections initiated it's kind of a don't-care - I think the only difference would be whether responses to ARP are provided.

> Now, compared to old Ip4Config behavior, we take 'ifconfig' tool command
> as example - "ifconfig -s eth0 dhcp":
> The Ip4Config->Start will be invoked to start the auto configuration. It was
> implemented in the deprecated driver -- Ip4ConfigDxe. When the system
> boot next time, the previous IP configuration will cleaned and the interface
> will be in UN-CONFIG status again.  Current implementation don't have this
> clean-up operation no matter Static/DHCP policy has been set. Is this the
> difference you mentioned?

Okay - this must be it - so DHCP magically turned back into "unconfigured" effectively creating the on-demand Configure() effect, at least for DHCP cases, that we now desire.  Interesting.

> Now, let us  consider your requirement:
> 1) The IP config information stored in NVRAM
> 2) A separate policy to delay the IP interface coming up until a component
> calls Configure ().
>
> #1 is also the current implementation. For 2), I remember you have one
> patch to do this implementation, can you share it to us for better
> understanding?

Yes, my first thought was to make the handling of Ip4Config2OnDhcp4SbInstalled conditional based on a PCD value (the policy in this case, would be in the PCD value).  Based on the limited experiment I did this seems to have the desired effect but based on your expertise perhaps there is a better location for such a check?

Thank you for patiently helping me with this - it's been enlightening to learn the history and thinking behind the config process.

Eugene






  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-17 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-10 18:17 DHCP Automatic Configure at Driver Connect Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-11  1:50 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-11  3:03 ` Ye, Ting
2016-08-11  5:59   ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-11 14:22     ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-11 15:20       ` Samer El Haj Mahmoud
2016-08-12  1:31       ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-12 12:31         ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-13  2:37           ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-15 14:40             ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-16  3:05               ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-16 19:41                 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-17  5:50                   ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-17 12:17                     ` Cohen, Eugene [this message]
2016-08-18  2:48                       ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-18  3:10                         ` Ye, Ting
2016-08-18 14:30                           ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-16  1:14       ` Ye, Ting
2016-08-16 19:19         ` Cohen, Eugene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TU4PR84MB0302CC29EA5337CE4DB49E31B4140@TU4PR84MB0302.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox