public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tlaronde@polynum.com
To: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>,
	Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: PING [PATCH 1/1 v2] EmulatorPkg: fixes for NetBSD
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 19:01:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7hh3nrSs81QdV26@polynum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKbZUD1KD3t00Zqu-WhQoEJaiKB8J7s+m3z8STQy_ipBTeDfwg@mail.gmail.com>

Le Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:40:43PM +0000, Pedro Falcato a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:50 AM <tlaronde@polynum.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > Ping'ing for this patch sent on November 2022.
> >
> > The patch is trivial. Can someone review it or eventually merge it if OK?
> >
> > TIA,
> > --
> >         Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
> >                      http://www.kergis.com/
> >                     http://kertex.kergis.com/
> > Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: tlaronde@polynum.com
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>, Pedro
> > Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:46:59 +0100
> > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1 v2] EmulatorPkg: fixes for NetBSD
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Laronde <tlaronde@polynum.com>
> >
> > Fixes for compilation on NetBSD.
> >
> > ---
> >  EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> >  EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c    |  7 +++++--
> >  EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h    |  7 ++++++-
> >  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
> > b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
> > index cf2d6b4cda..57b4c8d3be 100644
> > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
> > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
> > @@ -133,6 +133,20 @@ EmuBlockIoOpenDevice (
> >
> >        ioctl (Private->fd, DKIOCGETMAXBLOCKCOUNTWRITE,
> > &Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity);
> >      }
> > + #elif _NETBSD_SOURCE
> > +    {
> > +      UINTN  BlockSize;
> > +      off_t  DiskSize;
> > +
> > +      if (ioctl (Private->fd,  DIOCGSECTORSIZE, &BlockSize) == 0) {
> > +        Private->Media->BlockSize = BlockSize;
> > +      }
> > +
> > +      if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGMEDIASIZE, &DiskSize) == 0) {
> > +        Private->NumberOfBlocks   = DivU64x32 (DiskSize,
> > (UINT32)BlockSize);
> > +        Private->Media->LastBlock = Private->NumberOfBlocks - 1;
> > +      }
> > +    }
> >   #else
> >      {
> >        size_t  BlockSize;
> > @@ -154,7 +168,7 @@ EmuBlockIoOpenDevice (
> >      Private->Media->LastBlock = Private->NumberOfBlocks - 1;
> >
> >      if (fstatfs (Private->fd, &buf) == 0) {
> > - #if __APPLE__
> > + #if __APPLE__ || _NETBSD_SOURCE
> >
> Isn't this the wrong test? Shouldn't you test for __NetBSD__ instead? AIUI
> _NETBSD_SOURCE is just a feature test macro like _GNU_SOURCE, right?

You're right: I was focusing on "not POSIXly defined" and grapping to a
featuretest macro at the same level. __NetBSD__ will do.

> 
> >        Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity =
> > buf.f_iosize/buf.f_bsize;
> >   #else
> >        Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity =
> > buf.f_bsize/buf.f_bsize;
> > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
> > index 38c01c84af..1700a4b60f 100644
> > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
> > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> >  #define MAP_ANONYMOUS  MAP_ANON
> >  #endif
> >
> > +#define MAP_ANON_FD_ (-1)
> >
> Again, I don't think you need a define for this. At most you could just
> stick a -1 down there with a comment like:
> // We're required to pass -1 for anonymous mappings on BSD-like systems
> 

OK. I will suppress the macro and go to a comment.

> > +
> >  //
> >  // Globals
> >  //
> > @@ -187,7 +189,7 @@ main (
> >    //
> >    InitialStackMemorySize = STACK_SIZE;
> >    InitialStackMemory     = (UINTN)MapMemory (
> > -                                    0,
> > +                                    MAP_ANON_FD_,
> >                                      (UINT32)InitialStackMemorySize,
> >                                      PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
> >                                      MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE
> > @@ -348,6 +350,7 @@ MapMemory (
> >    while ((!isAligned) && (base != 0)) {
> >      res = mmap ((void *)base, length, prot, flags, fd, 0);
> >      if (res == MAP_FAILED) {
> > +      perror("MapMemory");
> >        return NULL;
> >      }
> >
> > @@ -640,7 +643,7 @@ SecUnixPeiAutoScan (
> >
> >    *MemoryBase = 0;
> >    res         = MapMemory (
> > -                  0,
> > +                  MAP_ANON_FD_,
> >                    gSystemMemory[Index].Size,
> >                    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
> >                    MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS
> > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
> > index 0c81cdfc01..0de925adaf 100644
> > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
> > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
> > @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> >
> >  #if __CYGWIN__
> >    #include <sys/dirent.h>
> > +#elif _NETBSD_SOURCE
> >
> Same as above.
> 
> > +  #include <dirent.h>
> >  #else
> >    #include <sys/dir.h>
> >  #endif
> > @@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> >  #include <net/if.h>
> >  #include <ifaddrs.h>
> >
> > -#ifdef __APPLE__
> > +#if defined(__APPLE__)
> >
>    #include <net/if_dl.h>
> >    #include <net/bpf.h>
> >    #include <sys/param.h>
> > @@ -65,6 +67,9 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> >    #ifndef _Bool
> >  #define _Bool  char  // for clang debug
> >    #endif
> > +#elif defined(_NETBSD_SOURCE)
> > +  #define statfs statvfs
> > +  #define fstatfs fstatvfs
> >  #else
> >    #include <termio.h>
> >    #include <sys/vfs.h>
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> 
> I can give you my Ack or RB after this, but FWIW I'm not a maintainer for
> EmulatorPkg so you'll still need appropriate reviews from the package
> mainainers.

OK. Thanks! I will prepare a v3 and let the maintainers decide.

Best,
-- 
        Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
                     http://www.kergis.com/
                    http://kertex.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C

      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-06 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-05 11:50 PING [PATCH 1/1 v2] EmulatorPkg: fixes for NetBSD tlaronde
2023-01-05 23:40 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-01-06 18:01   ` tlaronde [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7hh3nrSs81QdV26@polynum.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox