From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.106930.1680625948890665487 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 09:32:29 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="body hash did not verify" header.i=@quicinc.com header.s=qcppdkim1 header.b=nkn8xS8G; spf=permerror, err=parse error for token &{10 18 %{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com}: invalid domain name (domain: quicinc.com, ip: 205.220.180.131, mailfrom: quic_llindhol@quicinc.com) Received: from pps.filterd (m0279870.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 334DwEnh032009; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:32:16 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : in-reply-to; s=qcppdkim1; bh=rmYfLLR6pgy4Y5d3qhNePvGfa861udE/wZOuRkSlfNc=; b=nkn8xS8GcMBT71R+HafSISM22zk5amHfZwiJcC6pqL0ng71PFJX1Wu7hku/5DYQZSC/H iiwA1ufqmTnrmKwoUQ4UwgXWKKPuqFImuydcTcZNltEXuQzqBxAKCMIiXSaI9glaSyri ivjpO+QspTpsI3l3f95FKKg38/cxY8/6CYZUXmEom/+5H+qYjnQ0zJSJ1zKCZdabGpWY BpO+ee236S9MhqktnlSwnhtH+5sV5eVYxZgEoZYs2SL66qAOyPlmppiBx717UXKl6Vyu M4dE56QdIvWIJFblS797CeSnaSBcekUcvt6RJY8Ol75HE9gS4M/cUYWbBQhprCAOiBX0 9A== Received: from nasanppmta01.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3prn8b0fyn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:32:15 +0000 Received: from nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com (nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com [10.45.79.139]) by NASANPPMTA01.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 334GWEWL001788 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:32:14 GMT Received: from qc-i7.hemma.eciton.net (10.80.80.8) by nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.45.79.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.42; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 09:32:11 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 17:32:07 +0100 From: "Leif Lindholm" To: , CC: Rebecca Cran , gaoliming , Oliver Smith-Denny , Guomin Jiang , Xiaoyu Lu , Jian J Wang , Jiewen Yao , Ard Biesheuvel , Jordan Justen , Gerd Hoffmann , Bob Feng , Andrew Fish , Michael D Kinney Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOWbnuWkjTog5Zue5aSNOiBbZWRrMi1kZXZlbF0gW1BBVENIIHYyIDAwLzEzXSBCYXNlVG9vbHMsQ3J5cHRvUGtnLE1kZVBrZyxPdm1mUGtnOiBEZWxldGUgQ0xBTkczNSxDTEFORzM4LEdDQzQ4LEdDQzQ5LCByZW5hbWUgR0NDNSB0byBHQ0MsIHVwZGF0ZSBDTEFOR0RXQVJGLCBkZWxldGUgVlMgMjAwOC0yMDEzLCBFQkM=?= Message-ID: References: <20230328173111.759017-1-rebecca@bsdio.com> <02fb01d961dc$88d6acd0$9a840670$@byosoft.com.cn> <92a85636-3875-fd4d-06ff-dab9670370a5@bsdio.com> <000201d96695$331dede0$9959c9a0$@byosoft.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.45.79.139) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-GUID: eLSJWG_w4pRcoztiaQW4_Df4VuAo4Oe1 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: eLSJWG_w4pRcoztiaQW4_Df4VuAo4Oe1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-04-04_08,2023-04-04_05,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303200000 definitions=main-2304040152 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com id 334DwEnh032009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 16:57:18 +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 4:49=E2=80=AFPM Rebecca Cran = wrote: > > > > Okay. I'll rework the patch series to only delete GCC48 and keep GCC4= 9 > > and GCC5. >=20 > Please rename them? There's no point in keeping their current names > anyway. I guarantee you that most people are not really able to guess > GCC49 to be the "non-LTO" flavor. >=20 > And IMO Ard has already proved the value in non-LTO builds anyway, so > yeah. GCC and GCCNOLTO please. Agreed. I don't think there are any outstanding items that need resolving. I'd be very happy to stop hearing "you need GCC 5 in order to build edk2" misunderstandings. / Leif