From: "Sunil V L" <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Andrei Warkentin <andrei.warkentin@intel.com>,
Dann Frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt: Separate code and variable storage
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:20:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIr7A7gj8d5QlsPH@sunil-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM=mAO=KX1p34ou4pBb+yj8djQbPEMGaq+P38OjXzCLaKG1UBg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 07:11:18PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> schrieb am Mi., 14. Juni 2023, 19:01:
>
> > Recent updates to RISC-V qemu virt platform merged today (07/14),
> > have enabled both pflash devices for the S-mode payload like EDK2.
> > These updates also aligned the design similar to other architectures
> > where pflash0 is for read-only code and pflash1 for variable store.
> > Previously only pflash1 was available for S-mode use.
> >
> > Current EDK2 will not work with this latest qemu changes since it always
> > assumed to boot from pflash1. So, separate the code and variable
> > store and use pflash0 to keep the code.
> >
>
> Not all users will have the newest QEMU provided by their Linx distro. Will
> it be possible to boot the the same EDK II binary on old and new QEMU
> releases?
>
Hi Heinrich,
While both unified and separate images can not be generated at the same
time, a build flag can be used by which the user can build one of
the schemes matching qemu capabilities. Default will be separate
code and vars matching the latest qemu.
I believe this will alleviate the concern. If this looks better, let me
test and send v2.
Thanks!
Sunil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-15 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-14 17:01 [PATCH 0/4] OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt: Separate code and variable storage Sunil V L
2023-06-14 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt: Fix couple of issues in VarStore Sunil V L
2023-06-14 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt: Add VirtNorFlashDeviceTreeLib library Sunil V L
2023-06-14 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt: Add support for separate code and variable store Sunil V L
2023-06-14 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt: Add a readme for build and test Sunil V L
2023-06-14 17:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt: Separate code and variable storage Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-06-15 4:26 ` Sunil V L
2023-06-15 11:50 ` Sunil V L [this message]
2023-06-15 13:17 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZIr7A7gj8d5QlsPH@sunil-laptop \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox