From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32a; helo=mail-wm1-x32a.google.com; envelope-from=peter.wiehe2@gmail.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A062118F78B for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id q26so2649932wmf.5 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 14:35:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=vzmKfdbbtEzGlvGODHjBirJIOUFQBi8Wa9wVUZGM4vM=; b=XFq4DZLAaSs5d65Pf/EubxfgEkU9ZD7mP9L3R2dg78LIjKYk55bYi23EdrTKOdLdA1 NWEj8NQwBAewiq4MD4SgaSsUTlAu6YE+AayAO6++54bFutSYjZZMSuNAOpylsN6iHnN3 HreYDXsSSYPhE2BahZLhj3DLoZroBSKY9kbdMbmRSNY2IwZDz3/AP1Pn8Q34OnIb2LqL /a1phow+paVnwSWGc1bBAIbMj6pGM9MwY5BrUiv/WBM2qYEsehmhrvf9qY/EVL1z+Uo2 rd8Dh744umSruFZUf0y6U7vxbFlMIhpwFnyT8/+YnDzrqnLkiIfKY0XGETVAbI0LWd5K M5Qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=vzmKfdbbtEzGlvGODHjBirJIOUFQBi8Wa9wVUZGM4vM=; b=ObuMUKnYUs71Ed6bVvgD2ihT1HisVNojcz5Qqkcre6gMrxyH7jU6qlG729h7Hb6Ktx U13Rzrn9BdiFIm/P+OxaNurSGnQcVg/eziQ8wCLzCtdN2On6s8iboCQxK2IzRe4D7wB0 EC/2y1Csr5EfApE2SPYtplt9I3Ig4mb8LmmW1N4xgZUS6EHrZ5OQz4dvj7TDI+8CbHMr S3J2v3hZwcfs3wen0TU1079+hX0MZFT5fWUgoeZHquoHSsWjiZYgHHscPlPTp60luJv7 bN63Khspj7ANFSyvRmfjG1GvDQ1Xd7AvrdANeqk8+6EuwSrDKHMIvqmkx/IR7f2Mh4QP EXNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbwxX57UbvRQgTzCq6vLrRr5XpdUS1O61iuKiP40sWPVblMLO82 E5ddrPeTc2jQeomdI3E0lAkL+grCzag= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UWmZ+E3cOI4e26KO5btuyV+W7biQh4irK3FQNnuPj4p38SaVZ1pogYbAQw8XRVrYDXamRTBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2457:: with SMTP id k84mr111024wmk.139.1544135701165; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 14:35:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:908:d72:6480:24c7:c8da:e841:d3f6? ([2a02:908:d72:6480:24c7:c8da:e841:d3f6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k19sm2884841wre.5.2018.12.06.14.35.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 14:35:00 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Wiehe To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:34:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: edk2 and gnu-efi calling schemes X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 22:35:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US OK, another question: when writing an UEFI application, edk2 and gnu-efi have different 64bit calling schemes. Does that only apply to calling the runtime-library/object file (and inside of the UEFI-application, of course)? Or does the call from application to UEFI differ in both toolkits, too? (If it is the latter, it would mean that the UEFI standard is unprecise!) Kind regards Peter Wiehe