Hi Ard,

OK, let's go with HOBs and today I'm going to send the V2. :)


Thanks,
Chao
On 2024/4/25 00:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 13:19, Gerd Hoffmann<kraxel@redhat.com>  wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 09:57:50AM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
>>> Hi Gerd and Ard,
>>>
>>> Can I submit the V2 this week? I want all OvmfPkg changes to be meged before
>>> the 202405 feature freeze.
>> Yea, go ahead, lets stick to the PCD approach, given that Ard seems to
>> not have objections to that ;)
>>
> Apologies for my late response.
>
> As I have mentioned before (I think?) I strongly prefer HOBs over
> dynamic PCDs for values that are determined during PEI and not updated
> later.
>
> For other cases, I actually prefer protocols over PCDs because you can
> depex on protocols, and not on PCDs so you never know if the dispatch
> order is correct, i.e., whether PCD producers are dispatched before
> PCD consumers.
>
>
> 
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#118252): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118252
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105573103/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-