From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] BaseTools: Update GenFw to clear unused debug entry generated by VS tool chain
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:42:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a1de67a8-57c2-908e-dd4d-9726d60fb388@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499059281-11744-1-git-send-email-liming.gao@intel.com>
Hi Liming,
Gerd's Jenkins CI reported a GenFw segfault, with this patch applied.
I can reproduce the segfault locally. This is the command line:
> GenFw \
> -e DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER \
> -o .../Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_GCC48/X64/MdeModulePkg/Universal/ReportStatusCodeRouter/RuntimeDxe/ReportStatusCodeRouterRuntimeDxe/DEBUG/ReportStatusCodeRouterRuntimeDxe.efi \
> Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_GCC48/X64/MdeModulePkg/Universal/ReportStatusCodeRouter/RuntimeDxe/ReportStatusCodeRouterRuntimeDxe/DEBUG/ReportStatusCodeRouterRuntimeDxe.dll
Backtrace from gdb:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x00007ffff789c814 in __memset_sse2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.17-194.el7.x86_64 libuuid-2.23.2-39.el7.x86_64
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00007ffff789c814 in __memset_sse2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1 0x0000000000407492 in ZeroDebugData (FileBuffer=0x636e50 "MZ", ZeroDebugFlag=0 '\000') at GenFw.c:2898
> #2 0x0000000000406a4d in main (argc=0, argv=0x7fffffffd0b8) at GenFw.c:2591
See below for the SIGSEGV location:
On 07/03/17 07:21, Liming Gao wrote:
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> ---
> BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
> index 22e4e72..6569460 100644
> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
> @@ -2770,6 +2770,7 @@ Returns:
> {
> UINT32 Index;
> UINT32 DebugDirectoryEntryRva;
> + UINT32 DebugDirectoryEntrySize;
> UINT32 DebugDirectoryEntryFileOffset;
> UINT32 ExportDirectoryEntryRva;
> UINT32 ExportDirectoryEntryFileOffset;
> @@ -2781,12 +2782,14 @@ Returns:
> EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER64 *Optional64Hdr;
> EFI_IMAGE_SECTION_HEADER *SectionHeader;
> EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY *DebugEntry;
> + EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_CODEVIEW_RSDS_ENTRY *RsdsEntry;
> UINT32 *NewTimeStamp;
>
> //
> // Init variable.
> //
> DebugDirectoryEntryRva = 0;
> + DebugDirectoryEntrySize = 0;
> ExportDirectoryEntryRva = 0;
> ResourceDirectoryEntryRva = 0;
> DebugDirectoryEntryFileOffset = 0;
> @@ -2822,6 +2825,7 @@ Returns:
> if (Optional32Hdr->NumberOfRvaAndSizes > EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG && \
> Optional32Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size != 0) {
> DebugDirectoryEntryRva = Optional32Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].VirtualAddress;
> + DebugDirectoryEntrySize = Optional32Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size;
> if (ZeroDebugFlag) {
> Optional32Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size = 0;
> Optional32Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].VirtualAddress = 0;
> @@ -2841,6 +2845,7 @@ Returns:
> if (Optional64Hdr->NumberOfRvaAndSizes > EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG && \
> Optional64Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size != 0) {
> DebugDirectoryEntryRva = Optional64Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].VirtualAddress;
> + DebugDirectoryEntrySize = Optional64Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size;
> if (ZeroDebugFlag) {
> Optional64Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size = 0;
> Optional64Hdr->DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].VirtualAddress = 0;
> @@ -2886,11 +2891,23 @@ Returns:
>
> if (DebugDirectoryEntryFileOffset != 0) {
> DebugEntry = (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY *) (FileBuffer + DebugDirectoryEntryFileOffset);
> - DebugEntry->TimeDateStamp = 0;
> - mImageTimeStamp = 0;
> - if (ZeroDebugFlag) {
> - memset (FileBuffer + DebugEntry->FileOffset, 0, DebugEntry->SizeOfData);
> - memset (DebugEntry, 0, sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY));
> + Index = 0;
> + for (Index=0; Index < DebugDirectoryEntrySize / sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY); Index ++, DebugEntry ++) {
> + DebugEntry->TimeDateStamp = 0;
> + if (ZeroDebugFlag || DebugEntry->Type != EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {
> + memset (FileBuffer + DebugEntry->FileOffset, 0, DebugEntry->SizeOfData);
This memset() is the culprit.
According to gdb (all values decimal),
- Index = 1,
- DebugDirectoryEntrySize = 237,
- ZeroDebugFlag = 0.
These values look suspicious, because
sizeof(EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY) is 28, and
DebugDirectoryEntrySize (237) is not an integral multiple of that.
This is the first EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY element:
> (gdb) print ((EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY *) (FileBuffer + DebugDirectoryEntryFileOffset))[0]
> $11 = {Characteristics = 0, TimeDateStamp = 0, MajorVersion = 0, MinorVersion = 0, Type = 2, SizeOfData = 209, RVA = 33292, FileOffset = 33292}
This is the second one (which triggers the crash, Index=1):
> (gdb) print ((EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY *) (FileBuffer + DebugDirectoryEntryFileOffset))[1]
> $12 = {Characteristics = 808534606, TimeDateStamp = 0, MajorVersion = 0, MinorVersion = 0, Type = 0, SizeOfData = 1836017711, RVA = 1634479973, FileOffset = 796094307}
The second element is obviously garbage (FileOffset = 796094307, and
then the memset() wanders off into the weeds).
This is the contents of the DataDirectory:
> (gdb) print Optional64Hdr->DataDirectory
> $22 = {{VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_IMPORT
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_RESOURCE
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXCEPTION
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_SECURITY
> {VirtualAddress = 36864, Size = 4096}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_BASERELOC
> {VirtualAddress = 33264, Size = 237}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_COPYRIGHT
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_GLOBALPTR
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_TLS
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}, // EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_LOAD_CONFIG
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0},
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0},
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0},
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0},
> {VirtualAddress = 0, Size = 0}}
According to <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms809762.aspx>,
the format (element type) of the debug directory is specific to the
toolchain; the article says,
> To determine the number of entries in the Microsoft linker-generated
> debug directory, divide the size of the debug directory (found in the
> size field of the data directory entry) by the size of an
> IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY structure
Here's a hexdump of the debug directory (237 bytes starting from
(FileBuffer+33264)):
00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 |................|
00000010 d1 00 00 00 0c 82 00 00 0c 82 00 00 4e 42 31 30 |Ñ...........NB10|
00000020 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2f 68 6f 6d |............/hom|
00000030 65 2f 6c 61 63 6f 73 2f 73 72 63 2f 75 70 73 74 |e/lacos/src/upst|
00000040 72 65 61 6d 2f 65 64 6b 32 2f 42 75 69 6c 64 2f |ream/edk2/Build/|
00000050 4f 76 6d 66 58 36 34 2f 4e 4f 4f 50 54 5f 47 43 |OvmfX64/NOOPT_GC|
00000060 43 34 38 2f 58 36 34 2f 4d 64 65 4d 6f 64 75 6c |C48/X64/MdeModul|
00000070 65 50 6b 67 2f 55 6e 69 76 65 72 73 61 6c 2f 52 |ePkg/Universal/R|
00000080 65 70 6f 72 74 53 74 61 74 75 73 43 6f 64 65 52 |eportStatusCodeR|
00000090 6f 75 74 65 72 2f 52 75 6e 74 69 6d 65 44 78 65 |outer/RuntimeDxe|
000000a0 2f 52 65 70 6f 72 74 53 74 61 74 75 73 43 6f 64 |/ReportStatusCod|
000000b0 65 52 6f 75 74 65 72 52 75 6e 74 69 6d 65 44 78 |eRouterRuntimeDx|
000000c0 65 2f 44 45 42 55 47 2f 52 65 70 6f 72 74 53 74 |e/DEBUG/ReportSt|
000000d0 61 74 75 73 43 6f 64 65 52 6f 75 74 65 72 52 75 |atusCodeRouterRu|
000000e0 6e 74 69 6d 65 44 78 65 2e 64 6c 6c 00 |ntimeDxe.dll.|
The bytes 0x4e 0x42 0x31 0x30 ("NB10"), at offset 28, can be seen above
as "Characteristics = 808534606". Googling this value, it seems to be a
signature / magic value: CVINFO_PDB20_CVSIGNATURE.
Then, VirtualAddress = 33264 is 0x81F0 hex, and "objdump -x" reports:
> Sections:
> Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn Flags
> [...]
> 2 .build-id 00000024 00000000000081f0 00000000000081f0 000081f0 2**2 CONTENTS, READONLY
> [...]
> SYMBOL TABLE:
> [...]
> 00000000000081f0 l d .build-id 0000000000000000 .build-id
> [...]
Also, I found a function called pe_bfd_read_buildid() in the GNU
Binutils source that works with the PE_DEBUG_DATA entry of the data
directory.
In "BaseTools/Scripts/GccBase.lds", we have:
> /*
> * Retain the GNU build id but in a non-allocatable section so GenFw
> * does not copy it into the PE/COFF image.
> */
> .build-id (INFO) : { *(.note.gnu.build-id) }
This is from commit 7fd5d619806d ("BaseTools GCC: drop GNU notes section
from EFI image", 2016-07-27).
So... I don't really know what's happening here, but the DEBUG entry of
the data directory (i.e., the debug directory) doesn't seem to be
structured like GenFw expects.
> + memset (DebugEntry, 0, sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY));
> + }
> + if (DebugEntry->Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {
> + RsdsEntry = (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_CODEVIEW_RSDS_ENTRY *) (FileBuffer + DebugEntry->FileOffset);
> + if (RsdsEntry->Signature == CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_RSDS) {
> + RsdsEntry->Unknown = 0;
> + RsdsEntry->Unknown2 = 0;
> + RsdsEntry->Unknown3 = 0;
> + RsdsEntry->Unknown4 = 0;
> + RsdsEntry->Unknown5 = 0;
> + }
> + }
> }
> }
>
>
Thanks,
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-05 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-03 5:21 [Patch] BaseTools: Update GenFw to clear unused debug entry generated by VS tool chain Liming Gao
2017-07-03 5:28 ` Zhu, Yonghong
2017-07-05 12:42 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-07-05 13:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-07-05 15:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-07-05 13:41 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a1de67a8-57c2-908e-dd4d-9726d60fb388@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox