From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.631.1631663315553204487 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 16:48:35 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=aaguejul; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lPAdxlvkp4XW2EaIWKNMg2cuMSghR8b/E3iQSQ4kK4E=; b=aaguejulDmh4kVu8u+7UxrNjCS e/OBrP4BInvVVFleovm41I6BAr8LrdMmFq2bMtOsJLpbW0H/RR45C2ZQJ8l28yOnpIp0qIKnwuJ+3 y9tuw6w07CRY1imKMZv4wXlEiqvgOypoqV4t2oAyzSaceRCDe4A9ZEK3iMJg32pPqr+U=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]:49708) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mQIAE-00HWvG-K8; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:48:34 -0600 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]:59698) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mQI96-008jZ5-Ak; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:47:49 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C671280D45; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:47:22 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id sGZh0PStPTK8; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:47:22 -0600 (MDT) Received: from linbox.int.bluestop.org (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6998E12809E9; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:47:22 -0600 (MDT) To: devel@edk2.groups.io, afish@apple.com References: From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:47:22 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1mQI96-008jZ5-Ak;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.69;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, TooManyTo_001,XMNoVowels autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5001] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * -1.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;devel@edk2.groups.io, afish@apple.com X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 406 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.11 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 17 (4.2%), b_tie_ro: 14 (3.5%), parse: 1.90 (0.5%), extract_message_metadata: 28 (6.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.86 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 19 (4.6%), tests_pri_-950: 1.60 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.31 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 70 (17.2%), check_bayes: 67 (16.5%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.4%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.8%), b_comp_prob: 2.4 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 46 (11.4%), b_finish: 1.34 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 251 (61.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.64 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 35 (8.6%), poll_dns_idle: 33 (8.1%), tests_pri_10: 2.6 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 10 (2.5%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Add support for gdb and lldb X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US I was wondering what your plan for committing these to the repo is? It would be nice to get them committed so people can start using them. -- Rebecca Cran On 8/8/21 3:46 PM, Andrew Fish via groups.io wrote: > This patch set adds debugging support for gdb and lldb. > It also adds generic debugging classes that use a file like object to > make it easy to import into any debugger that supports Python. > > Since these debugging scripts don't depend on any EFI code I was thinking > we could place them in the root of the repo to be easy to discover. > > I've tested gdb on Ubuntu and lldb on macOS for IA32 and X64. > > Andrew Fish (3): > efi_debugging.py: - Add debugger agnostic debugging Python Classes > efi_gdb.py: - Add gdb EFI commands and pretty Print > efi_lldb.py: - Add lldb EFI commands and pretty Print > > efi_debugging.py | 2187 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > efi_gdb.py | 918 +++++++++++++++++++ > efi_lldb.py | 1044 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 4149 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 efi_debugging.py > create mode 100755 efi_gdb.py > create mode 100755 efi_lldb.py >