From: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
To: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
star.zeng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] MdeModulePkg/Core: prevent re-acquire GCD memory lock
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:22:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6181c15-3384-02c8-5957-7605b27ce12f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181024052620.4088-6-jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Some minor comments are added below.
With them addressed, Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>.
On 2018/10/24 13:26, Jian J Wang wrote:
>> v3 changes:
>> a. drop the changes to CoreGetIoSpaceMap() because it won't cause
>> problem
>> b. refine the logic in changes of CoreGetMemorySpaceMap()
>> and add more comments
>
> This issue is hidden in current code but exposed by introduction
> of freed-memory guard feature due to the fact that the feature
> will turn all pool allocation to page allocation.
>
> The solution is move the memory allocation in CoreGetMemorySpaceMap()
Use 'moving' instead of 'move'?
> and CoreGetIoSpaceMap() to be out of the GCD memory map lock.
Please remove CoreGetIoSpaceMap() as the code does not touch it at all.
>
> Although it's rare, a while-loop is added to make sure that the count
> of descriptor of memory map is the same after memory allocation, because
> it's executed outside the GCD memory lock.
>
> CoreDumpGcdMemorySpaceMap()
> => CoreGetMemorySpaceMap()
> => CoreAcquireGcdMemoryLock () *
> AllocatePool()
> => InternalAllocatePool()
> => CoreAllocatePool()
> => CoreAllocatePoolI()
> => CoreAllocatePoolPagesI()
> => CoreAllocatePoolPages()
> => FindFreePages()
> => PromoteMemoryResource()
> => CoreAcquireGcdMemoryLock() **
>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c
> index d9c65a8045..bc02945721 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c
> @@ -1691,10 +1691,10 @@ CoreGetMemorySpaceMap (
> OUT EFI_GCD_MEMORY_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR **MemorySpaceMap
> )
> {
> - EFI_STATUS Status;
> LIST_ENTRY *Link;
> EFI_GCD_MAP_ENTRY *Entry;
> EFI_GCD_MEMORY_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR *Descriptor;
> + UINTN DescriptorCount;
>
> //
> // Make sure parameters are valid
> @@ -1706,38 +1706,66 @@ CoreGetMemorySpaceMap (
> return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> }
>
> + *NumberOfDescriptors = 0;
> + *MemorySpaceMap = NULL;
> +
> CoreAcquireGcdMemoryLock ();
Better to add comment for it like below quoted from the example at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-October/031279.html given
by Laszlo.
//
// Take the lock, for entering the loop with the lock held.
//
>
> - //
> - // Count the number of descriptors
> - //
> - *NumberOfDescriptors = CoreCountGcdMapEntry (&mGcdMemorySpaceMap);
> + while (TRUE) {
> + //
> + // Count the number of descriptors. It might be done more than once because
Use 'count' instead of 'number' to match the variable name?
> + // there's code which has to be running outside the GCD lock.
Use "AllocatePool() calling code below" instead of "there's code"?
> + //
> + DescriptorCount = CoreCountGcdMapEntry (&mGcdMemorySpaceMap);
> + if (DescriptorCount == *NumberOfDescriptors) {
> + //
> + // Fill in the MemorySpaceMap if no memory space map change.
> + //
> + Descriptor = *MemorySpaceMap;
> + Link = mGcdMemorySpaceMap.ForwardLink;
> + while (Link != &mGcdMemorySpaceMap) {
> + Entry = CR (Link, EFI_GCD_MAP_ENTRY, Link, EFI_GCD_MAP_SIGNATURE);
> + BuildMemoryDescriptor (Descriptor, Entry);
> + Descriptor++;
> + Link = Link->ForwardLink;
> + }
>
> - //
> - // Allocate the MemorySpaceMap
> - //
> - *MemorySpaceMap = AllocatePool (*NumberOfDescriptors * sizeof (EFI_GCD_MEMORY_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR));
> - if (*MemorySpaceMap == NULL) {
> - Status = EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> - goto Done;
> - }
> + break;
> + }
>
> - //
> - // Fill in the MemorySpaceMap
> - //
> - Descriptor = *MemorySpaceMap;
> - Link = mGcdMemorySpaceMap.ForwardLink;
> - while (Link != &mGcdMemorySpaceMap) {
> - Entry = CR (Link, EFI_GCD_MAP_ENTRY, Link, EFI_GCD_MAP_SIGNATURE);
> - BuildMemoryDescriptor (Descriptor, Entry);
> - Descriptor++;
> - Link = Link->ForwardLink;
> + //
> + // Release the lock before memory allocation, because it might cause
> + // GCD lock conflict in one of calling path in AllocatPool().
> + //
> + CoreReleaseGcdMemoryLock ();
> +
> + //
> + // Allocate memory to store the MemorySpaceMap. Note it might be already
> + // allocated if there's map descriptor change during memory allocation at
> + // last time.
> + //
> + if (*MemorySpaceMap != NULL) {
> + FreePool (*MemorySpaceMap);
> + }
> +
> + *MemorySpaceMap = AllocatePool (DescriptorCount *
> + sizeof (EFI_GCD_MEMORY_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR));
> + if (*MemorySpaceMap == NULL) {
> + *NumberOfDescriptors = 0;
> + return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> + }
> +
> + //
> + // Save the descriptor number got before for another round of check to make
Use 'count' instead of 'number' to match the variable name?
> + // sure we won't miss any, since we have code running outside the GCD lock.
> + //
> + *NumberOfDescriptors = DescriptorCount;
> + CoreAcquireGcdMemoryLock ();
Better to add comment for it like below quoted from the example at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-October/031279.html given
by Laszlo.
//
// Re-acquire the lock, for the next iteration.
//
> }
> - Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>
> -Done:
> CoreReleaseGcdMemoryLock ();
Better to add comment for it like below quoted from the example at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-October/031279.html given
by Laszlo.
//
// We exited the loop with the lock held, release it.
//
Thanks,
Star
> - return Status;
> +
> + return EFI_SUCCESS;
> }
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-25 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-24 5:26 [PATCH v3 0/6] Introduce freed-memory guard feature Jian J Wang
2018-10-24 5:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] MdeModulePkg: cleanup Heap Guard pool/page type PCD documentation Jian J Wang
2018-10-25 2:55 ` Zeng, Star
2018-10-25 4:21 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-10-24 5:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] MdeModulePkg: introduce UEFI freed-memory guard bit in HeapGuard PCD Jian J Wang
2018-10-25 3:02 ` Zeng, Star
2018-10-25 4:23 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-10-24 5:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: consider freed-memory guard in non-stop mode Jian J Wang
2018-10-24 5:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: prevent recursive calling of InitializePageTablePool Jian J Wang
2018-10-24 5:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] MdeModulePkg/Core: prevent re-acquire GCD memory lock Jian J Wang
2018-10-25 3:22 ` Zeng, Star [this message]
2018-10-25 4:24 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-10-24 5:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] MdeModulePkg/Core: add freed-memory guard feature Jian J Wang
2018-10-25 3:37 ` Zeng, Star
2018-10-25 4:29 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-10-25 6:28 ` Wang, Jian J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6181c15-3384-02c8-5957-7605b27ce12f@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox