From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
devel@edk2.groups.io, ray.ni@intel.com
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>,
Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe: Duplicate OvmfPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe driver
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 20:30:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a65ab53c-7421-01c7-133b-1a88cca782bd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKbZUD3d93ovSAkk1hGwQN0eaHerWiwhKeA4HX4Ebb+vjt5dqQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/15/24 09:59, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:04 AM Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> This commit only duplicates the OvmfPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe.
>> Following commits will enhance the driver.
>
> Hi,
>
> Please describe why you're doing this change. i.e what's your use case
> for LocalApicTimerDxe,
Right, I have the same question -- although, admittedly, I've not been
CC'd on the cover letter (0/6), and the reason could be captured there.
(I'm not going to check my edk2-devel folder again today, only finishing
up my personal INBOX. So tomorrow when I check edk2-devel, I might
actually find the reason in the cover letter.)
On a second thought, I'm (retroactively?) surprised that
LocalApicTimerDxe was (apparently?) first introduced under OvmfPkg --
i.e., for VMs? That's not impossible, but feels a bit strange.
> and why are you duplicating this instead of
> moving OvmfPkg's (why do we need to maintain 2 separate versions of
> what is essentially the same driver)?
Not wanting the NestedInterruptTplLib dependency / functionality in
UefiCpuPkg's instance of this driver seems justified (patch 2). Also,
patch 4 calculates the timer frequency based on CPUID; might not be
straightforward to use on VMs without prior verification.
The tricky parts to review in this series are the math in patch 4 (such
code is usually prone to integer overflows, so that's my concern by
default there), plus the big comment in patch 6.
I'll try to look at them later.
Meta-comment for Ray: patches like patch#1 are best formatted with the
option "--find-copies-harder" (try it please, the output speaks for itself).
Thanks
Laszlo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#113847): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/113847
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103734961/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/12367111/7686176/1913456212/xyzzy [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-15 8:03 [edk2-devel] Add LocalApicTimerDxe driver in UefiCpuPkg Ni, Ray
2024-01-15 8:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe: Duplicate OvmfPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe driver Ni, Ray
2024-01-15 8:59 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-01-15 18:10 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-01-16 10:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-16 17:17 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-01-15 19:30 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2024-01-16 8:47 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-16 9:48 ` Michael Brown
2024-01-16 14:34 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-16 15:16 ` Michael Brown
2024-01-16 15:37 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-17 7:11 ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-17 10:46 ` Michael Brown
2024-01-19 13:14 ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-19 17:42 ` Michael Brown
2024-01-19 23:44 ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-20 0:49 ` Michael Brown
2024-01-22 10:15 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-15 8:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/6] UefiCpuPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe: Remove NestedInterruptTplLib call Ni, Ray
2024-01-15 8:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 3/6] UefiCpuPkg: Add LocalApicTimerDxe driver in DSC file Ni, Ray
2024-01-15 8:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe: Enhance Timer Frequency calculation logic Ni, Ray
2024-01-15 8:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe: warn if APIC Timer is used by other code Ni, Ray
2024-01-15 8:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 6/6] UefiCpuPkg/LocalApicTimerDxe: Passing fixed timer period is not a bug Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a65ab53c-7421-01c7-133b-1a88cca782bd@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox