Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] BaseTools/Ecc: Replace deprecated function time.clock()

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>]

On 5/14/20 10:18 AM, Michael Kubacki wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> 
> It has been a policy from Microsoft contributors to not include a year 
> in the copyright header you will find this in many other existing files 
> in edk2, I am simply aligning to that practice.

If you want an aligned codebase, we should first remove all they years 
in all the other Copyright lines.

> 
> Bob is the maintainer and as maintainer he chose to submit the patch (it 
> has been on the list since May 8th). It has been relatively common to 
> reply to the patch thread to indicate it was submitted with commit 
> details.

This is extra work for the maintainer, but save time to reviewers.
The mergify bot could do that, but (see previous comment below) it is 
probably not worthwhile if the plan is to switch to GitHub pull requests.

> I noticed the details were not updated in the BZ either in this 
> case so I have done that and closed the BZ.

Thanks for this.

> 
> Thanks,
> Michael
> 
> 
> On 5/14/2020 12:37 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> +Michael & Laszlo.
>>
>> On 5/13/20 4:15 AM, Bob Feng wrote:
>>> Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: michael.kubacki@outlook.com <michael.kubacki@outlook.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2020 10:23 AM
>>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>>> Cc: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Gao, Liming 
>>> <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] BaseTools/Ecc: Replace deprecated function 
>>> time.clock()
>>>
>>> From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>>>
>>> REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2707
>>>
>>> Ecc fails with Python 3.8 because it uses the deprecated time.clock() 
>>> function - https://docs.python.org/3.7/library/time.html#time.clock
>>>
>>> This change updates EccMain.py to use time.perf_counter().
>>>
>>> Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>>> ---
>>>   BaseTools/Source/Python/Ecc/EccMain.py | 5 +++--
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/Python/Ecc/EccMain.py 
>>> b/BaseTools/Source/Python/Ecc/EccMain.py
>>> index 560bb9fd7a31..72edbea3b883 100644
>>> --- a/BaseTools/Source/Python/Ecc/EccMain.py
>>> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/Python/Ecc/EccMain.py
>>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>>>   # This file is used to be the main entrance of ECC tool  #  # 
>>> Copyright (c) 2009 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
>>> +# Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.<BR>
>>
>> When trying to apply this patch I got:
>>
>> error: patch failed: BaseTools/Source/Python/Ecc/EccMain.py:2
>>
>> Because it has already been merged as commit 
>> 242ab73d7f255d5d859eaf74a23b9d68c686d177.
>>
>> 1/ The copyright comment misses a year range
>>
>> 2/ It is annoying to not know a patch has been merged.
>> What is the expected workflow? Pull repository, look at patches 
>> merged, then go on the list to review the un-merged ones? I suppose 
>> this won't matter once workflow is switched to GitHub. Still, not very 
>> practical.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>>>   # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent  #
>>> @@ -406,9 +407,9 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
>>>       EdkLogger.Initialize()
>>>       EdkLogger.IsRaiseError = False
>>> -    StartTime = time.clock()
>>> +    StartTime = time.perf_counter()
>>>       Ecc = Ecc()
>>> -    FinishTime = time.clock()
>>> +    FinishTime = time.perf_counter()
>>>       BuildDuration = time.strftime("%M:%S", 
>>> time.gmtime(int(round(FinishTime - StartTime))))
>>>       EdkLogger.quiet("\n%s [%s]" % (time.strftime("%H:%M:%S, %b.%d 
>>> %Y", time.localtime()), BuildDuration))
>>> -- 
>>> 2.16.3.windows.1
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>
>